Humans only discover laws (laws are
always human creations, by the way) if said laws existed before their discovery.
Not exact matches
A degree of kinship between
human beings and the rest of physical
creation has
always been clear to an extent, but the depth and detail of our interrelationship with the rest of life on the planet is being confirmed over and over again in breathtaking detail by new scientific advances such as genetic studies and molecular biology.
It's
always nice to see that
humans are capable of
creation and not just destruction.
But while institutions are
always the
creation of
human beings, and whether they are just or unjust, effectual or ineffectual depends entirely on the people who use them.
A vis - à - vis, whether another
human being or
creation itself, is
always required.
The
human mind that abstracts from the realism and intuition of St. John, to theologise its own version of the Jesus of History as distinct from the Jesus of Faith, must
always end up with a supreme Prophet who is less than the transcendent divine, who is not pre-existent to the Universe and
Creation, and who at the very highest is «divine» only as a supreme emanation of a «holy and noble consciousness» at the root of being itself, and identified with
Creation itself.
That the
human creator
always has a given concrete actuality to work with does not of itself establish a difference between him and God, unless it be admitted as made out that there was a first moment of
creation.
We
human beings too are
always a living and a causal part of that one «
creation in community» for better or worse, for good or for degradation, (cf Col 1, 16 - 26.
However, this «new kind of reality,» who is Jesus, is an emergent manifestation of God in
human life emanating from within
creation: «a unique manifestation of apossibility
always inherently there for
human beings by virtue of their potential nature being created by God... a new mode of
human existence emerged through Jesus» openness to God making him a God informed
human being» (ibid).
[5] In particular, our understanding of
creation should not be based on the analogy with a
human craftsman in as much as he
always works with what already exists.
The first part of any religious textbook on Earth
always discusses the Beginning or
Creation thus making this first rule for all
humans.
«24 His own positive view of globalization reads thus: «The Trinity, as mystery of communion of the three Divine Persons, has
always given herself to
creation as well as to the life of every single
human being, and has revealed herself — under the forms of sociability, mutual openness, love and self - giving, but also accusation and protest against the lack of such values — to the communities of humanity.
The understanding that Christ fulfils all that is good in
human nature and in
creation can be lacking in these theological circles (with notable exceptions, of course), so there is not
always a strong emphasis on the link between liturgy and the rest of life.
A second, and all are closely interlinked and interdependent, the nature of
human sinfulness, interpreted
always in part against the presuppositions of the
creation faith.
God intended equality among men; but «private property, slavery, imperialism, the State itself, appear in post-Fall society as regulations of God to preserve nature, which is
always being disrupted by sin».26 Justice thus appears as the rough, necessary, coerced order of
human societies which is not wholly antithetical to love, since it serves the purpose of God in the
creation and history.
Her bold installation feels monumentally vast but the sculptures
always remain grounded by a distinctly
human presence evident in their
creation.
He observes that our history as a
human species has
always included wellness practices such as holding each other, engaging in dance, song, image
creation, and storytelling, and sharing celebrations and family rituals.