Sentences with phrase «always increase its emission»

«Without disturbing its developmental interests, India can always increase its emission trajectory and maintain its leadership position for the developing countries,» said Ajay K. Jha, coordinator of the country «s Beyond Copenhagen Collective.

... And their spicy food always increases my emissions.»

Not exact matches

The effect will not always be to increase emissions, however: they may sometimes fall when top predators disappear, according to modelling Atwood carried out alongside the experiments.

In these ways, the emissions gap report gives the questionable impression that despite increasing emissions there's always a way to reach the 2C target, it's always «five minutes to midnight.»

Therefore, if you keep increasing forcing, yes the «Planck emissions» will also keep increasing but always ending in higher overall temperatures.

4) Recently there were a couple of years where global CO2 emissions showed no increase yet the amount of CO2 which ended up in the atmosphere showed a slow steady increase that it always has for the last 50 years.

The emphasis has always been on carbon «pollution» and the press release is careful to claim no adverse impact on carbon emissions at the regional level skirting the question whether NY emissions will increase.

Storms and extreme rainfall events have always happened, but with the added heat in the atmosphere and oceans due to greenhouse gas emissions, storms now occur with increasing accumulated energy and higher moisture loading.

The capacity of the sink increases in proportion to anthropogenic production increase so the net accumulation is always exactly half of anthro emission.

Increase energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy «We think that whatever electricity supply option Switzerland chooses, and whatever measures to reduce CO2 emissions the country applies, a stronger focus on energy efficiency should always be part of the process.

The simple facts are, the U.S. emissions will always increase temperatures unless they are cut to absolute zero.

Secondly, I wonder if anyone ever pointed out to him the irony in encouraging the hon Gentleman to «not always believe everything he reads», directly following his statement that «scientists have linked greenhouse gas emissions to an increased risk of major floods.»

In comparing annual human CO2 emissions with annual increase in atmospheric CO2, it was always a mystery to me why human CO2 emissions showed such a poor correlation with changes in atmospheric CO2 levels if human emissions were supposed to be driving the atmospheric levels, but his lecture explains this very clearly.

And the recent EPA decision to strip away a key component of the agency's «once in, always in» (OIAI) air pollution protection policy could result in increased emissions of toxic pollutants from major industrial sources in essentially every state.

From what I understand, the actual concentration increase is always less than what would be expected from the mass of emissions.

(Note, by the way, that what is true for a radiating object is that the amount of radiation emitted AT ANY PARTICULAR WAVELENGTH is an increasing function of the temperature, a fact that is not always obvious because people often tend to normalize the emission curves when showing emission curves for different temperatures on the same graph.)

Increasing emission is always and only caused by increasing temperature INSIDE the radiating body, never dropping temperatures OUTSIDE the radiaIncreasing emission is always and only caused by increasing temperature INSIDE the radiating body, never dropping temperatures OUTSIDE the radiaincreasing temperature INSIDE the radiating body, never dropping temperatures OUTSIDE the radiating body.

«Increasing emission is always and only caused by increasing temperature INSIDE the radiating boIncreasing emission is always and only caused by increasing temperature INSIDE the radiating boincreasing temperature INSIDE the radiating body.»