Sentences with phrase «always injured»

Dr. Bren: And he was wondering why he was always injured.

Remember everybody ARSENAL one man is responsible for that WENGER tactically inept, player purchaseing POOR xhaka # 30 plus millions Mustafhi Always injured.

Caceres was certainly a likable player and got along with his teammates but what good are you to the team if you are always injured and unable to fill in when the 2nd string is supposed to fill in.

Bob By the way arsenal bought rosicky from germany injury prone they bought bishoff injury prone vanpercy injury prone are these players not a risk as well so what is your point Schwarzer is a whole lot better that almunia so that could not be a risk if we go two good years from himthat would be money well spent look at vanpercy always injured he is the biggest risk.

Having all these players is good for nothing if they are always injured.

Thats» without even bothering with upgrading on players who are getting too old or are always injured.

We spend 20 mill on a whole heap of young players may be even more and only 1 comes through or in some cases none or their always injured or take a whole heap of time to mature.Vanpersie is proof of that and the list can go on, Now this new signing from Asia, lets talk about now, he can't help us this season.

Aguero is almost always injured for spells every season but delivers the goods.

I know we had players out cesc we miss and maybe walcott and vermarlyn but not vanpercy he is always injured how we put up with him for so long i don't know.

Also while always injured is harsh, imjury prone isn't as we've seen over a number of years.

Re the comment by Tapera it is ridiculous to label someone who played most of last season for Bournemouth (until he broke his leg) and all season for us as «always injured».

In a way he reminds me of Kewell and Liverpool — such great talent but always injured (though, personally, I'd have Rosicky over Kewell anyday).

I do not call him a weed because he is always injured but because he has the strength of a wet tissue and has chosen to do nothing to increase that strength in the gym.

Gibbs Ramsey Monreal Koscielny Arteta have been injured and Sanogo Gnabry and Ospina injured and Diaby is always injured.

Rosicky was in his 30's but was always injured but we kept him around in the hope that he might get over his injury problems.

Arteta — completely off the pace Flamini — will give 100 % but lacks quality Diaby — always injured Rosicky — just passed his best.

He is always injured... Just kidding If he can manage to stay fit he is an excellent squad player, but i thought that our problem was that we need a wc Striker.

Diaby (Always injured) 4.

He's made of glass, always injured.

New Manager, Top Striker, creative midfielder (Cazorla is unreliable now, always injured), LB, GK.

The only reason why Jack wasn't getting any game time at Arsenal was obviously because he was always injured!?

Marco Reus?!?! His injury record is bad even before coming to the injury Club, we can't afford to have him with us but always injured.

Wilshere always injured.

Flamini and Arteta are not good enough, Diaby is always injured, Wilshere is more attacking.

Khedira is always injured.

Cazorla hasn't played for ages and is always injured.

Debuchy is always injured.

hes always injured.

Rosicky + Arteta over the hill + Wilshere always injured Sanogo Gnabry Wellington in the wilderness.

Theos always injured mate, theres no way he can be the man on the bench.Theo gets a big injury at least once evey season

Diaby, Sanogo injury wrecks Walcott Wilshere Chamberlain Gnabry always injured over rated and inconsistent.

Not 1st 11, but overall squad, after first 11 we have no one, talent yes but always injured hence unreliable.

lets spend 80 Gs per week on a past - it, always injured player cause he «contributes» in training.

Unfortunately he is always injured.

He's Been So Inconsistent And Always Injured.

This guy is always injured Liverpool would eat your hand off for # 30m.

He is always injured.

Diaby is always injured while Rosicky plays one game in 5.

Don't tell me the OX was always injured as Walcott too had many injury problems.

He hardly plays and is always injured but is kept on as the «proof» that any local kid especially white kid can make it.

Wilshere is more b2b and isn't great defensively Arteta and Flamini have lost quite a bit and can't play consistently for long periods Diaby is quality but always injured Chambers and Bielik are inexperienced at DM

Always injured when opponents see such numbers in d squad it immediately strikes fear n commands respect, no use of it being in the hospital yearly

Walcott is always injured and inconsistent there's no way in hell is he better than Di Maria stopping looking at things with Arsenal blinders on but as a football fan, Di Maria is world class a champions league winner, a world cup finalist Walcott is nowhere comparable!!

and as they are always injured..

This has been happening over and over again but the manager refuses to address the issue by bringing in quality back - up because of his loyalty to players that are either too, old, always injured or simply too average.

I'm not one for conspiracy theories (except JFK, MH370, the moon landing, Elvis, 2Pac, Biggie, MH17 etc) but had anyone wondered why Ozil and Walcott are always injured at opposite times?

We have to sell at least 10 players before we even think about selling Santi, you give reference with Rosicky yeah we didn't get a lot from him and we don't expect a lot from him either, he was always injured anyway, and I don't there's any gunner who regretted keeping Rosicky for one more year, in fact I won't mind him retiring here, he was like a symbol of Arsenal and that's what Cazorla is now, beside he's not injury prone like rosicky, and age is just a number.

Diaby is always injured.

Wilshire, Arteta ox and Rosicky are always injured more often than not.

If there are any players who don't cut it anymore like Mertsacker and Flamini and Diaby (always injured) we must get rid of them regardless of How loyal they are or How much we like them.