Not exact matches
If you work in an office, you
know that complaints
about the office
climate are common: it's
always either too cold or too hot for someone.
But, given how multi-disciplinary
climate science is, there are
always going to be technical issues outside your field that you are going to need to
know more
about.
Due to the nature of their work,
climate scientists
know more than the rest of us — but even they don't
always agree
about the ways in which
climate change will affect weather in specific places.
«We may notice more hurricanes and heat waves than usual and become concerned
about climate change, but we don't
always know the best ways to reduce our emissions,» Lacasse said.
A small upturn, or even one year of warming, is enough to start the now well
known clamoring
about the disastrous impacts of
climate change, yet any movement in a downward direction is
always met with cries of derision, or claims that even that is really due to
climate change.
Second, we will
always know less
about what drives paleo
climate because we
know less
about the key factors that drive global heat balance in the distant past than we
know about the present, for which we have precise measurements.
A contrarian stance is
always seriously flawed in one way or another, and
knowing this error is just as good as being taught
about climate reality in some topical way... Keep up the good work RC!
«Whilst it is
always important to think
about the future in the light of changes we observe to the Earth's
climate, in trying to draw conclusions so far ahead based on what we
know, the IPCC scientists are speculating far beyond any reasonable scientific justification.»
There is
always solar - temp correlation — causal correlation — the sun is undoubtedly one of the crucial
climate drivers —
no doubt
about it.
«Well I'm sitting like a rose between two thorns here and I have to take practical decisions - erm - the
climate's
always been changing - er - Peter mentioned the Arctic and I think in the Holocene the Arctic melted completely and you can see there were beaches there - when Greenland was occupied, you
know, people growing crops - we then had a little ice age, we had a middle age warming - the
climate's been going up and down - but the real question which I think everyone's trying to address is - is this influenced by manmade activity in recent years and James is actually correct - the
climate has not changed - the temperature has not changed in the last seventeen years and what I think we've got to be careful of is that there is almost certainly - bound to be - some influence by manmade activity but I think we've just got to be rational (audience laughter)- rational people - and make sure the measures that we take to counter it don't actually cause more damage - and I think we're
about to get -»
On other occasions, if people around me would mention something
about the weather, I would try to explain what I
know is going on with the weather but I could
always see the mental barrier going up as I was pointing to obvious signs of
climate engineering around us.
It is one thing I have
always said
about climate predicting computer models is that we don't yet, and may never,
know all of the factors involved.
He frames the talk as a result of a challenge issued on Twitter — he was debating some prominent left - leaning commentators who said they
always shy away from discussing
climate change because they don't
know enough
about the complex issue to defend the position that we should be addressing it.