Sentences with phrase «always know the answer to»

I receive a LOT of substitution questions, and I don't always know the answer to them.

If you've ever used an online dating site you won't always know the answer to that.Have you ever been suspicious of the faceless profile constantly viewing your personal ad?

As ProFx 5.0 user you will always know the answer to all those questions because it's 100 % rule based and all rules are easy to understand.

Not exact matches

«But, when asked questions I don't know how to answer, I always say so.

We don't know all the answers to these questions, but we're always experimenting and learning.

There's a lot of things that go into it, which we don't even always 100 percent know the answer to but we kind of guess based on the feedback that we have from our audience.

I am so tired of listening to Sales 101, for example, always start with a question that the prospect can't answer with a «no».

If you don't bother to ask, the answer's always «No».

In my experience, every single person, no matter how amazing and legendary, will always take the time to answer good questions.

They answered my millions of questions and were always around to get to know me after class.

We had an excellent experience with Laurie She was right on top of everything and was always available to answer any question we had, no matter what day of the week.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

Yesterday, President Obama took to the podium and proclaimed, ``... we have always been and always will be a triple - A country,» and it sounded like empty sentimentalism from a man at a loss for words and for meaning» the kind of helpless, grasping - at - straws thing you say to a defeated friend you are trying to buck up, even as you know you lack the answers, or the resources, to offer either consolation or solutions.

I always begin to answer that question by emphasizing that although the answer is «No,» the real question is, «Have you believed in Jesus for eternal life?»

I've always been told that God's answers to prayer are «yes», «no», or «not yet».

But this past week I was talking to someone about grace, and they objected with the grace litmus test, and I don't know what happened, but I sighed out of exasperation and decided to give a different answer than the one I had always given before.

But if we are humble before Him, and our hearts long to know Him, He will not always give us ALL the answers, but He will assure us about His character, that even when we don't see the whole picture, He is the one who holds every piece of the puzzle, and He knows where they go....

And then there's Colossians 4:6, which says, «Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone.»

The obvious answer to anything we don't know is always: «Some man in the sky did it».

That's always their answer to anything they don't know or can't understand or need an answer for... But that also pretty much means that this all knowing all being God of theirs is simply the sum total of all human ignorance.

It's so comforting to know that people like you will always have the same answer for everything.

I know that we Christians think we have the answer to this, though I am not sure we always do a good job expressing it (or living it ourselves).

I think there can be no doubt that the answer to the first question is, yes; and the answer to the second is, almost always.

i always strive to choose truth over fiction — knowing that — you may be able to answer your second question fairly easily.

I don't know how to answer so I'm gonna do whut I always does and bluster and bloviate like some cow in season until everyone gives up and goes away.»

Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.

You begin to embrace the questions, you start asking more and more and more... and when you realize that the only answer to some of those questions is «I don't know», you suddenly feel liberated, free of the ego trip that religion is, always saying it knows the answers when, really, it only wishes it did.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

In contrast, some months ago in Las Vegas I asked five persons in wheelchairs in five different casinos whether they had encountered any barriers to their entrance; the answer was always, «No, should there be?»

Something I always say to myself is «God Answers Prayers», this i'm sure you know.

Because, knowing that nobody knows the answer to the facts of this life, at least we have the free will to think whatever we want, without fear, but always trying to be logic and common sensed.

I looked in amazement to Jesus for an answer, for He always knew my thoughts.

One option would be to suppose that it only seems that God has not answered our prayers; God always answers, but frequently says No.

We don't have to pretend to be perfect, like we don't have problems, like things don't hurt us, like we always know the right answer.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

I'm always open to different theories; who knows, my answer may be there.

Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone.»

Recently when ever i watch AW on TV giving an interview i don't know weather to laugh or vote for him for the next president of France, he has become to arrogant, predictable robot like with his answers but most of all his undermining his supporters treating them like Children who don't understand, its possible you can do this if your decisions or play is always correct but to fail and pretend it like its anything ells but a failure is wrong, Arsen man up and say we fuc ed up and show your disappointment at players who are not giving all or just sub them if they are having a bad day its normal,

Hi davidnz let me repost my answer for the other topic here: thanks a lot ^ ^ you are one of the critics of wenger / commenters i do like along with fatboy and muffdiver etc. first of all, yep i am indeed a fan of arsene but i do nt think that he always knows best, and i also think that this season was a terrible failure, and the blame has to go to the manager and some players.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

You can blame the press in a way, they ask the questions we all want to know the answers to, yet get fobbed off by Wenger with the attitude that EVERYBODY who asks these questions are stupid, Its always the refs fault OR the linesman or the other teams dog, OR every pundit in the world is wrong and cant see the genius that is AW's plan of action ect ect.

You all know full well we always get thrashed by decent teams away and stop hyping over Joel Campbell like he's the answer to all problems, he's nothing special, had a couple of good games for Costa Rica and a good season for Olympiacos, he's really going to be nothing in the prem.

Time being the onward marching bastard that it is, the answer to that last question is always, eventually, no, and so it came to pass.

on whether he can accept that if he doesn't say anything now he's just leaving the door open... No, look, I am just amazed that I have to always answer things that are exactly the same.

Why can't people for God sake understand the angle the young man was coming from, this is a guy who has come out to suggest what he feel will be of great glory to the team, futbol is about winning trophy not the samba, champaign, tick taka or jambody style Of playwill be accredited to ur cv after retirement, every professional player will wants to be identify with a medal, mind you he have limited years to his career, therefore we should not allow sentment or affections we have for our various teams erode the basic objective of the game.we should also think about their future too, this guys are proffessionals which young lads are looking up to and questions will be ask tomorrow about theirs playing days.can people tell me why pele and some other famous players in the world both present and past are been celebrated today the answer is simply cos they are successful in their career and have trophy to show for it in their respective clubs or countries, why the complain in nigeria?its simply cos our team for quite a while now has not recorded any troph to her glory, fans should learn how to call a spade a spade in order to balance situation and also for better performance of the team.why then did arsene wenger hurridly went to buy more experienced players after the poor outing he had at the beggining of last season?this players know beta cos they are at the centre of it all, we don't have to trash what they say, we fans are only watching from screen, in as much as we beliv in arsen wenger, we should also know that without the boys no arsen wenger, fans should try to reason along with the players too.an hypotetical cases of similar to rvp has been tested by some players and have put them right over the coach and the team.so, whatelse does the fans needs to prove that futbol has gone beyond living in the past.for example, fabrigas and nasri were able to prove their critics wrong.thank God for them, we should always be objective in our submission, how else do we expect players to show their commitment to a team that was in 8 on the log table and later fought their way back to 3rd this boys are commendable and deserve to be encouraged, I think is high time the manager and the mgt board of arsenal futbol team get to know that game of futbol has gone beyond two teams domination, its now like a pendilum which can swing either way only with a powerful insrument called money.you can't eat ur cake and have.

«These are always difficult questions to answer because we never know what's going to happen tomorrow.

When people ask how often she wakes in the night, my answer is always, «Hell if I know, because I don't have to wake up!»

I didn't let what I found stop me seeking a professional opinion though, but it did help me find a few answers to questions while I waited for an appointment and we all know it's not always easy to see a GP as fast as you would like.

I know a TV is not always the answer but he seems to enjoy it and I can have a moment to prepare dinner or prepare another cup of coffee.

We hope their answers will offer the always on - the - go sports parents we know you are some fresh ideas and choices for healthy, easy - to - make breakfasts, lunches, dinners and between - meal snacks for your active children.