Sentences with phrase «always make more sense»

Rather than doing it with an annuity purchase, creating an inflation hedge through your market - based assets will almost always make more sense.

I think in a vast majority of cases if you are going to live in a house at least 2 years it almost always make more sense to buy.

«Third - party bundles (games developed by another developer) are more expensive, but in many cases [are] associated with one console over the other... Even third party bundles cost only around $ 40, and the perceived benefit is $ 50 or more... Thus, bundles always make more sense.»

In about 75 % + cases, when I have run the numbers for clients or friends, buying almost always makes more sense if you are going to live in the house for at least 3 years.

«To city redevelopment people, it has always made more sense to develop in the cities, where people are, instead of building roads to take people out into the country,» Stemmler says.

Not exact matches

While it doesn't always make strictly rational financial sense — if you have a 3.5 percent mortgage but can earn 7 or 8 percent from investing, putting extra money towards your mortgage does result in opportunity cost — the emotional impact could more than offset that «loss.»

When you are young and earning less (thereby benefiting less from tax deductions), it makes infinitely more sense to favor Roth IRA over 401 (k) or traditional IRA; although, I advocate always contributing enough to 401 (k) to get the employer match.

As your business grows and you generate more leads, it doesn't always make sense to get in touch with every single lead.

This makes sense, since often times, high net worth individuals seek the safety and yield of munis, and the market infers a slight spread above Treasuries since a municipality is more likely to default on a loan than the US government, which can always just print more money under the US Fiat currency model.

Though you're probably aware that over time, homeownership makes more sense than renting, but that doesn't always mean it's appropriate to your unique situation.

From a webmaster's perspective, having a fast site always makes sense since it will provide an overall better user experience, enticing more clicks and page views and less abandonment of shopping carts by frustrated users.

The modern concept of a state of motion makes it clear what is meant: something which does not really become more but simply alters, and in this sense comes about, but in such a way that what is new in it is always identical with the relinquishing of something of the old.

Maybe he knew that we women would learn more by listening more... I have found that doing what God intends is always rewarding, even if it doesn't makes sense at first.»

But, also, any human with common sense knows that at this time, all religions and creeds known to men - are full of crap and instill separatism among groups of humans as if one is more valuable to God - they guy who supposedly made everyone and everything - separatistic ideas as «my book» my god» «my people» are the most beloved by God are wrong, will be always wrong and all religions are wrong and will always be wrong.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

Children can't help being narcissists, and they are always trying to make sense out of and control an adult reality far more complex than they can imagine.

Though these promises can not always be kept, they are far more practical than projects to «foster every individual's right to his or her own unique development» — projects that make no sense in the African context.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

And with the Angels suddenly relevant once more, and the Mariners seemingly always a couple of good breaks away from competing (I know, I know), upgrading the rotation makes a lot of sense for Houston.

There are always some bowl results that make little sense; there is nothing in the stats that suggested this result was anything more than one or two percent possible.

Considering he's almost always been so much more athletic than his opponent, it makes sense that he still needs to develop his patience when attacking.

it removed uncertainty and things make a lot more sense now: why we always finish in top4, why we do nt buy to make the final step from 4 to 1 etc..

Paying a 24 - year - old MVP the kind of money he's earning for his team makes far more sense than tacking on a fifth year to the contract given to a 30 - year - old MVP, just because that's always how it's been done.

Having known Sir Alex for more than 20 years, and from everything he has always said, it does not make any sense that he stops now.

But his positioning sense means that he is always well placed to nick the ball — he makes an average of 1.8 tackles and 1.6 interceptions per game — and immediately looks to find one of the Partenopei's more creative players.

It makes sense to me, that a keeper who spends 75 % of a game doing next to nothing and then concedes will always come under the spotlight a lot more than a keeper who may concede 3 or 4, but actually have a good game.

I don't always explain the full scientific principles to my children, but watching and taking part in activities like these really does encourage children start to question why things happen, and the concepts we introduce will become start to make more sense to them as time goes on.

SUNNY GAULT: Not even really I was just more like, if I was, I'm so bad at this but like if I was noticing that not in my mind, not enough milk was coming out, I would want to reposition the flange to make more milk come out or I'd want to like maybe I was kind of pressing it on the sides and stuff like that but it wasn't like I'm it wasn't a true massage but anyways, I always had to have my hands on it I never could really go pump free because I felt sorry hands free because I never really felt like I was getting, maximizing the session if that makes any sense.

I have always thought that the tribal way of the family / village helping to raise the child makes much more sense both for parent and child.

That always made sense to me — when something is not used for it's designed purpose their is more likely - hood for disease to set in.

This practice makes more sense to me if it's something steeped in tradition that your family has always done.

Co-parenting (sometimes called shared parenting) does makes sense on one level, in that more frequent contact with both parents is usually (but not always) associated with happier, healthier children.

Co-parenting (sometimes called shared parenting) makes sense on one level, in that more frequent contact with both parents is usually (but not always) associated with happier, healthier children.

There were contradictory regulations that didn't always make sense, inconsistent enforcement and rules, burdensome paperwork, inaccurate reporting and more.

Indeed, what makes corn ethanol «renewable» — in the sense that we can always make more of it by planting more kernels — is actually a huge part of what makes it so unsustainable in the long term.

I remember learning in high school geometry that there's more than one way to reach the same solution — and what makes the most sense to you doesn't always make the most sense to me.

It makes sense to change your diet as soon as possible if you have psoriasis, or more likely as soon as you've had enough of the itchy, scaly red skin that always seems to irritate you either by the symptoms felt on a daily basis, like showering for some, or with the unsightly lesions you would rather be rid of.

Now of course, this isn't always the case, but it would make MUCH more sense to ask for clarification than to suggest with «A tip» that I go read something I'm already referencing.

I'm always biased towards minimal dresses, and during the hot months of summer it's never made more sense.

My past experience with other serums has always been that serums, when their effects are immediate, make my skin feel more stretched than tight, if that makes any sense, and it's uncomfortable.

Kristina Bazan has such a chic sense of style that is quite in line with mine, and the fact that she also started her blog in her teens makes her that much more relatable to me, so her blog is always at the top of my list.

I've always done them at the conclusion of the season but I noticed a lot of bloggers sharing posts lately with favorite past fall outfits and wondered if it made more sense to move future posts like this to the beginning of the relevant season.

Applying a lipstick on, always makes me feel more confident and feminine (if this makes any sense to you) and gives me the powerful feel of being ready to cease the day and anything that's on my schedule for that day.

HI, am from Lancaster CA with good sense of humor love meeting new people and know more about them am cool and outgoing and i look forward in meeting someone special on here that will always make me happy... if you care to know me more txt me

Journeyman director James McTeigue's better work (V for Vendetta, Sense8) has always maintained an element of social commentary: we sense him lingering when Burke tells Union «You are a woman, alone, at the mercy of strangers», which makes it even more cathartic whenever our resourceful heroine locates a weak spot.

Even though you can't give them orders (makes sense, as your character is the «rookie), they almost always make the best decision, and I like that they will purify demons (more on that later) for you, too.

While there was always intelligence shining through his work, even when he was just cast as the guy who runs around doing stupid stuff, his more recent work shows a real sense of decency that makes him all the more appealing.

It's a plush and strangely ornate film despite the hellish setting and there's always the sense that Shortland is perhaps more interested in making a crimped, up - market costume drama in the mould of Jane Campion's Bright Star than she is a bona fide survival movie with dirt under its fingernails.

And part of that is because the film twists and turns like a dream — all of the pieces are there, but it doesn't always make sense — so it can be frustrating at times, especially if you expect a more traditional story that force feeds you exposition.