Sentences with phrase «always mean people»

The absence of DNA doesn't always mean a person is innocent, so DNA alone isn't enough to solve a crime, Siegel cautions.

Not exact matches

People only think that they always want the neatest and newest thing on the block until they remember that «new» also means changes, anxiety, learning curves, resistance, incremental costs, discomfort, etc..

Always assess the validity of the advice offered, and don't take advice from people who mean well but are not qualified to give it.

The focus on where the future is going is always focused on tech but the real challenge is talent and agility, which means keeping your people in a constant state of evolution, changing with your market quick enough to beat the trends.

While Internet marketing can mean different things to different people, it's almost always about communicating with potential and existing customers about your company, products and what you can do for them.

This is always uncomfortable, but even more so during a fun social event which is meant for people to relax and connect.»

Apologizing doesn't always mean you're wrong and the other person is right; it means you value your relationship more than your ego.

Although you may work at «a software company where people are coding and they're in hoodies and sweats,» that doesn't mean you «always have to look like the sloppiest person in the world.»

But the decision to prosecute people for their lies is a matter of judgment, and it is by no means clear that the relevant officials have always exercised good sense.

We want to give people the chance to take control of their money; to make it the way it was always meant to be: free - flowing and secure, for the everyday and the extraordinary.

«Integrity means the person will always attempt to do the right thing for the company and the customers,» says Weiss.

At Green America, green always mean social and economic justice people AND the planet.

«People in this business always want to be in the top decile, and that's a laudable goal, but mean reversion says that if you're in the top decile, you're likely going to be in the bottom decile,» O'Neill said.

This means that people always know where you are.

This means that there will probably always be many different proposals of how some people think that Bitcoin should work.

If you've got 100,000 USD in solvent assets that means you'll rake in 25,000, a livable amount for a single person in an affordable area, but the stake itself is significant and returns may not always be so good.

Paul explicitly equates democracy and socialism, believing that people of modest means will always vote for the smiling bureaucrat offering a bag of free groceries or subsidized health care.

I always thought it meant that God was greedy and jealous and liked to kill people and knock down their walls and turn them into salt, just like a nasty old man would do.

What I meant by that was people who were always trying to help the poor materially, without imparting sound temporal wisdom coupled with the call of the Gospel.

Always be suspicious of people selling fear — it is the tactic of sleazeballs who can not persuade by more honest means.

I know that once I hear or read one of those terms, it almost always means that the person using the term is going to tell us that their magic term means they are right and the other person is wrong because the other person is using a «straw man», they're «cherry picking» or now they're on «the slippery slope».

Kant's second form of the categorical imperative states that we should always treat persons as ends in themselves never merely as means to our ends.

It is always true of Dasein that «I am it»; but in a discussion where what «be» means is precisely what is under question — above all when made grammatically finite in the first person (see SZ 24 = BT 46)-- this tells us much less than we might think.

I WILL always be a militant Atheist if it means I can keep nutbags from telling me how to live my life and what I can do not because it hurts another person but because their imaginary sky man tells them they can't and as a result I can't either.

The strategy I always try to use is that the person didn't mean to attack me, even if it sounded like it.

What we meant to model was the sending of one of our number to be a foreign missionary — to learn a new language, to understand a local culture, to sacrifice the amenities of affluence and to live knowing that he or she is always being watched by seekers — while the rest of us stay here as lifetime local missionaries, learning to speak the language of the unchurched, understanding secular culture, sacrificing the amenities of affluence and living as a «watched» person in a society that is skeptical of Christian spirituality until it sees the real thing on display.

It may mean learning to love the unlovable, not needing to always be right or pretty, or popular, or rich, or going to five Bible studies every week, or hanging with the cool people.

majority doesn't always means they are right... just more people who are wrong... lol..

Most people like to see their content accessed widely and so can learn some great tips (as well as read some good content) from these blogs, but «most popular» doesn't always mean «best» I'd say that for any blogger a key to judging your own success is to think about the purpose and intended audience of you blog — if you have a niche audience in a specific location you may not get a huge following but if you set out to acheive something worthwhile through your blog and you achieve it then that counts as success.

It is no wonder that many turn away from Christianity, for your comments are often mean and spiteful, rather than following the apostle's Paul's words: «Let your words always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should answer each person.»

I spoke about giving and sharing, how living with other people means that we can not always have our own way and how in marriage, as in our families and churches, we must place the interests and needs of others above our own.

It seems that a lot of the entertainment industry thinks «strong woman» means «beats people up and kicks ass,» but that's not always the case.

Temporal stability may indeed be a positive value to certain persons in certain situations, but it is by no means the only value, nor is it necessarily always a positive value.

These people who «Know his voice» always seem to get it, and I mean get it better than me, and I have all the education.

When discussing Calvinism with Calvinists, there are two texts that are almost always brought up in defense of God's right to do anything He wants with people, even if it means deciding from all eternity to send billions of them to everlasting punishment in hell.

It means, first, that the understanding of God that persons in a theological school come to have is always concrete.

I've found my people without the striving and organizing, without the Official Sanctioned Church Programs, nope, we just all came into each other's lives, right at the time when we were meant to be there, we stayed open to finding each other, a part of me was always watching for the hints of my people, and so when I found them, I recognised them, I did.

The writer of this article takes the words used in the Bible a little deeper, and explains that what people read when they read it isn't always what was meant in the original language.

First, as the title of a key chapter puts it, the American example shows that religion can «Make Use of Democratic Instincts» in a manner mutually beneficial to itself and democracy; second, sustainable democracy needs religion, which means we can expect democratic peoples to remain attached to its continuance or at least potentially receptive to its revival (cf. II, 2.17, # s 17 - 20); third, democratic times, because they are enlightened times, tend to be ones of increasing doubts about religion; fourth, the relevant religion for America and Europe, Christianity, will be tugged against and perhaps eroded by powerful and ongoing democratic currents toward liberationist and materialist mores; and fifth, religion's authority in democratic society will always rest upon common opinion.

He knows that the depth of love is never concentrated solely on a person; but always has a hunger for the full being of that person which means his being in God.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

Funny this guy is a false prophet, I am not a religious person but during my life I did try to find a religion tried many, and the one verse I always remember is (stay out of her my children) meaning stay out of the gov and not mix - it into your faith, the one religion that sticks to this are jehovah's witness.

I have always been puzzled by Christianity's use of the Old Testament to justify supposedly «holy wars», which in our country has meant, at least for some people, every war in which we have been involved.

However, in the end, the dominant influences in this campaign were anonymous: they were the people who decided to fund and promote the «equality» agenda wherever and however possible; the editors and sub-editors of influential publications who carefully manipulated the presentation of the issues so that reasoned argument always looked cold and uncaring, and above all, the educators who decided to teach social inclusion by means of a series of examinable clichés rather than do the hard work of equipping people to think for themselves (but that is for another long article...).

Kant's categorical imperatives, «Act always on such a maxim as thou canst at the same time will to be a universal law» and «So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only,» are actually in one sense imposed from without.

What you continually, and I do mean continually, avoid, is that their slaves were PROPERTY, and I asked you very early on whether slavery (the owning of another person) was always wrong.

«A historical mystery always means a relation between a super-personal fate and a person, and particularly that which is atypical in a person; that by which the person does not belong to his type.»

I have always wondered when people say that someone is green with envy... do they mean green... like in «money»?

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

We must always be aware of the important truth that our means are the thing which creates opacity between God and men, far more so than our person.