Sentences with phrase «always means a change»

Progress always means change, and change is seldom easy, especially when we are dealing with subjective and even sacred issues in our lives.

Not exact matches

Technology changes constantly, which means there's always a new idea your business can try.

People only think that they always want the neatest and newest thing on the block until they remember that «new» also means changes, anxiety, learning curves, resistance, incremental costs, discomfort, etc..

The focus on where the future is going is always focused on tech but the real challenge is talent and agility, which means keeping your people in a constant state of evolution, changing with your market quick enough to beat the trends.

The market is always changing, meaning you need to be learning so you can always change with it.

Almost always, critics say, the changes meant a move away from protecting user privacy toward pushing openness and more sharing.

Constantly changing exhibits meant there was always something new to see.

And though technology means that the ways you can communicate will continue to change, there are some hard and fast rules about communicating in a crisis that will always hold true.

Changing course doesn't always mean adapting to failure.

That doesn't always mean «the boss» — rather, it means the member of the group who seems most likely to be a strong proponent of change.

Interest rates on federal loans are always fixed, which means that once you take out a loan, the rate won't change.

While his commitment to new regulations comes with a giant asterisk — he always emphasizes that he is amenable to the «right regulations,» which basically means «minimal changes» — the door is clearly open in a way that it wasn't before.

Remember that signing up for a repayment plan such as IBR does not mean you have to stick with it forever; you can always reevaluate in a few years if your financial situation changes.

I like to always start with the premise that I will «let the market take me out», meaning, I want the market to show me that my trade is invalid by moving to a level that nullifies the setup or changes the near - term market bias.

Be mindful that a shift in market internals doesn't necessarily mean that the entire cycle has changed from bull to bear or vice versa, so we always have to allow for shifts.

By the time you get to the end of the line the statement always and I mean always is distorted or completely changed.

In the present context this means pushing beyond current assumptions to changed life styles — but always with the wisdom of the serpent and the innocence of the dove,

Moreover, violence is always used in the conviction that it is the only means adequate for attaining a noble end — social justice, the nation's welfare, elimination of criminals (for the political or social enemy is always considered a criminal), radical change of the economic structures.

Brightman makes the needed qualification of «the innocence of the given» to accommodate this change of view saying «the innocence of «the given»... does not mean that the given is always of in all respects innocent.

This does not mean that a radical and drastic change in moral standards is always involved.

Now, all that being said, I do kind of disagree with a church asking their congregation to get permanent body art for Lent, which is meant for giving up something for a relatively short period of time... this is something that they'll always have with them, even though their beliefs may change.

the wages of sin is DEATH but the gift of God is ETERNAL LIFE thru Jesus Christ our LORD... no matter what schemes or plans man comes up with to avoid the TRUTH, TRUTH will always will be TRUTH, you can't change TRUTH and because JESUS is true and his word is true and is a God that can't lie nor is he the son of man to repent then that means unless you repent you shall all likewise perish Luke 13:5..

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Paul repentence just means changing ones mind the choice we have is to either live for Jesus or live for ourselves.Its interesting that the preaching you mentioned was always on how bad we are and how sinful that is just condemnation and self righteousness it takes no effort to do that.It just putting people down and it is a false sense of who God is.

But people of his political leanings will always try to change the meaning and definitions of issues to suit their own ends.

It is not a sufficient condition for classification as an evolutionary cosmology that a philosophical system take some vague cognizance of, or prove itself compatible with the brute historical facts of evolutionary change and transformation (which are by no means always «upward» or «progressive»).

Phrygian to me i sense that you are struggling with issues in your mind that you cant reconcile and these issues are affecting what you believe in your heart and therefore your faith in God.I had something similar happen to me recently regarding the story of the demon possessed man at one point the demons begged Jesus to cast them into the pigs does that mean that Jesus was implicated with the work of satan.It cast my mind into doubt and then i began to question who God is.I prayed and sort the holy spirit for an answer the answer i got was that Gods character never changes he is always holy righteous and sovereign why else would satan ask for his permission.So the answer was that he allowed satans purpose to prevail so that we can see that satans intention is always to destroy it may well have been that the pigs were his anyway.As they were for the gentile nations who offered the pigs to their demon Gods.Just as satan can not change who he is the destroyer the thief the liar God can not change who he is when we realise that despite what we see going on in the world God is still the same yesterday today and forever.The time is coming when those that have hurt others will be judged for there wickedness as we serve a holy and just God.Just as it was in the times of Noah so it is with this this generation that as the wickedness reachs its zenith then the Lord will return to judge the nations.He is coming again and we need to be ready it is not a time to be caught sleeping.brentnz

Although it literally means, «to change one's mind» it always has sin as it's object, and so repentance always means to turn away from sin.

But, if we insist that the Logos was in the beginning and before the beginning, it means very simply that God was always like Jesus and always will be, and that Jesus did not come to change the attitude of God to men, but to show quite unmistakably what that attitude is and always was.

While it is true that repentance literally means «to change the mind,» the term is almost always used in reference to sin and so it is accurate to think about repentance as a turning away from sin and back toward God.

In every age of change, people act out in their living the tensions and meanings of their age, and they always run the risk of losing traditional insights because they are unable to relate them to the contemporary patterns of their lives.

As the word Metanoia simply means «a change of mind», you can not state that repentance is ALWAYS used in reference to turning away from sin, and turning toward the obedience of God.

That is what the word Shani means (Yeshua did not teach in Greek but either Aramaic / Hebrew / Shana can be a noun as in Year which is always changing or as a verb such as Mal 3:6.

Consumers are changing the way they use restaurants and a night out does not always mean a typical full - service, casual dining experience anymore.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

DETROIT — Adrian Peterson hasn't given up on his ultimate goal — «I always keep the mark at 25,» he'll often say, meaning a 2,500 - yard rushing season — but he quickly realized this offseason that the Vikings had changed their approach.

images we want amangyang and Evans for me ud get two players for 90 # million with a lot change I mean a lot but my point is we want two them and yet can't get but we were offering 90 for lemer hahahaha think about it there's smell off afc for years and years oh just mention we sold walcott, coq and Sanchez and ox and Gabriel haha only replacement is miki haha question is will always is wenger or board who is playing chess with fans cheque mate all of us oh just pop in ozil doesn't no how sign he's name and jack went gluten - free and hasn't strength sign with lack gluten my god welcome to our promise with having better team than Bayern Munich dream on we be lucky get 5 this year sad state affairs

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

which is the opposite of Spanish big 2 clubs where they do have inexperience managers but their supporting them with players recruitment and they always wins something big within 2 years.The only hope i have is behind the scene changes towards next season i mean sven and Sanllehi and wenger to leave Arsenal at the end of this season otherwise is not gonna work because of chemistry

We all have not always been loyal to the team, not the ones who welcome defeat if it means the manager change they want.

On the one hand, any change always means uncertainty, and there are many more ways that changes can go wrong than go right.

But noone and i mean noone can convince me that wenger's not selling us short to match his ego and as you always say (to say i told you so) I'll be ridiculed if complain this much when the season starts because you know what would be the response ala (judge the team in may) Wenger has done very little to change my views on him this summer but time will tell

AW has changed nothing abt youth policy, l think that the inevitable was always going to happen; we have some many of these players already in the first eleven eg Jack, Song, Fab etc with so many ready to impress but unused say JET Vela Which means our squad is now bigger so much that we can play 11 youths with experience to face teams Newcastle.

Your style is something that's always changing and evolving, and that means clearing out your wardrobe and replacing some of your fabrics is going to be easier than anything else on this list.

What do you recommend as far as even making it more comfortable for the adults because I think so often we have I mean I see these pictures of these beautiful nurseries were they've got cribs and changing tables and there is like either maybe a rocking chair or a glider and when you got two that's not always the most practical I mean you've got you know I mean parent is going to be there for considerable amount of time...

This means that there is always a solution to your changing pad regardless of size or shape that you choose to buy.

Odds are, you always lay baby the same way on the changing table, which means she's spending lots of time turning the same direction to see you.

Additionally, it is always better to have an active means of attachment to the frame — that is, you have to click, snap, button, or strap a changing table or bassinet into place rather than just have it resting on a frame.

They are also much more likely to try to undress themselves by this age, so firm fastenings mean the parent isn't always redressing their child, but remember too that this age group wriggle a lot more whilst having their diaper changed so ease of fastening is a must.

That doesn't mean I like it and it doesn't mean I am not always trying to make the change to stop yelling.