Sentences with phrase «always on the wrong side»

Sorry Dude but Christianity's history has proven they are always on the wrong side or morality when it comes to civil rights.

conservatives are almost always on the wrong side of history.

On an empty autobahn and on the twisties in the hinterlands near Munich the pair is always on the wrong side of the 20 - mpg mark.

Some puppies think they're always on the wrong side of a door, and try to dash out any time it opens.

It seemed I was always on the wrong side.

Not exact matches

We should continue to share the word of the wisdom of the Lord to every man of this world till the end.for in the word is the understanding of everything created by the almigthy, the word comes with understanding of the existance of the holyspirit which drives us into love, peace and harmony and great things will always be with us forever we will never be caugth on the wrong side.

Christians like you in American history has always been on the wrong side of civil rights and morality.

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

Bigots like you have always been on the wrong side of the law.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The away side always looked dangerous on the attack, and had it not been for several clearly wrong decisions by the home linesman, the game would have been beyond doubt long before Rubenstein slotted home into an empty net after Sam Donald had squared the ball to him just before the hour.

It's true that the grass always seems greener on the other side, but when even your friends who sold their souls to the dullest corporate firms in the world seem to be having a better time than you, there's something wrong.

Whenever I'm craving something on the sweeter side, I always opt for making baked donuts and you really can't go wrong when pumpkin puree is included.

Already on board is Hero Girl, a solemn, gentle African American who becomes the boy's friend and also befriends Lonely Boy, who lives on the wrong side of the tracks and always seems sad.

Consistently funny, with a few surprises, «Horrible Bosses 2» finds Nick (voice of reason Bateman), Kurt (always horny Sudeikis) and Dale (frantic and funny Day) back on the wrong side of the law when they attempt to pull off a kidnapping in an attempt to get back at Hanson senior, who has pulled a fast one and is about to take over their invention.

It's not always successful, the film can topple onto the wrong side of silly at times, but after a very shaky opening 15 minutes I warmed to it and tapped into the unusual tone and bafflingly peculiar goings on.

Excellent performances bolster this ramshackle tale of a champion boxer trying to make good with his life following the loss of the one thing that always managed to keep him on track, his beloved wife, both orphans who met in foster care as they grew up on the wrong side of the tracks in Manhattan's Hell's Kitchen.

I forgot to post the first trailer, but like all bad movies it always gives you another chance to talk about it so check out the new theatrical trailer below: Synopsis: Dominic and his crew find themselves on the wrong side of the law once again as they try to switch lanes between a ruthless... Continue reading «TORETTO SAYS «FAST FIVE» HAS A JOB TO DO»

LUCAS HEDGES: (As Danny O'Neill) Lady bird always says that she lives on the wrong side of the tracks, but I always thought that that was, like, a metaphor.

After a long flight, it's always a good idea to let the jet lag ease a bit before jumping into the pricey car that doesn't belong to you, in the foreign country where the roads are scary narrow and the steering wheel is on the wrong side.

Whether they're on the right or wrong side of the law, they're always tangling with spacefaring threats — like the Mad Titan Thanos.

I've put together the following scenarios to help you realise that when things go wrong, you can always turn things around and look on the brighter side.

However, these efforts have essentially always been blocked, and it's almost always been along party lines... with the Republicans on the wrong side of the issue.

The idea that everything on the Alarmist side is always right and everything on the Sceptic is always wrong is obviously a stupid and mundane assumption, yet all you do is apply your «brilliance» to one side.

SG: Republicans haven't always been on the wrong side of the environment.

On one hand I know - I've seen so many sibling relationships go wrong, but I've always heard / experienced only one side of it.