Sentences with phrase «always see the need»

If you have a 2.5 % mortgage rate, I don't always see the need to pay down your mortgage debt super fast as this is such a low rate.

With a strong background in Health & Fitness, I always saw the need for complete overall Health.

People who put value on the time that others spend to make the society a better place will always see the need to write the congratulation letters.

Not exact matches

Where the Small Business Scorecard is concerned, the good hiring news really needs to be tempered with the fact that we continue to see more and more reliance on independent contractors — workers without company - paid benefits and matching FICA taxes, and people who can't always count on their employment continuing.

Great CEOs are always trying to see what's next — the thing around the corner that they need to prepare their business for.

[W] e always see with these types of laws, the politicians couch them in terms of the need for regulation for things like «protecting tax revenue» or «safety standards,»» writes Mike Masnick.

Up until now the conversation has always been this is the «Commonwealth's debt» but now we are seeing that in fact there are layers to that analysis and each issuing entities debts need to be considered in isolation.»

There's this fallacy that good content always gets discovered; but the truth is that good content needs distribution in order to be seen.

«It's one of the first things when you're sitting with a client for the first time, or even clients you've had for a while, you're always wanting to see where, if you need money in a short - term fashion, where is it going to come from?»

A plan will always come in handy because you'll be able to see the proper strategies needed to maximize your loan.

To a business owner, the need for their services / products is crystal clear, and they always see the best in their business.

Always loving a challenge, Michele's interest peaked when seeing the need for Pure Barre teachers in the Irvine area.

That said, to me there are three key principles we always try to uphold: 1) You need to be ready with your «what if» situations before you launch a campaign; 2) monitor like crazy both the mainstream and fringe conversations to see if anything is bubbling; 3) act fast and course correct if you have to.

[JB:] Until the body of Christ, I believe, begins to pray, fast and consecrate itself and realize that there needs to be a desperation for God, we will not see spiritual transformation in this nation, let alone social transformation, which is always the result of a moving of God across a people.

I have always respected & supported his need to have this blog, I still do... I certainly don't agree with all of it, I don't see the church or religion as darkly as he does.

Clearly we need to look at this phrase «paschal mystery» rather closely, and see if it is simply a new and concise way of expressing what the Church has always held about the Mass, or if it is indeed expressing a new conception of the Mass, and if so, whether this newconception can be justified.

The Church has always honoured Mary, always seen her role as crucial - and in doing so has found her a sure anchor in holding fast to truths that need to be taught with clarity.

If that happens to you, it's always worth checking back a few days later to see if there is a new need, particularly if you have a rare blood type.

You don't always need to know the name of what you see.

Be honest, and feel free to pose that nagging question that always comes to mind when you see advertisements asking you to support children in need.

Although they are quite willing to agree that all people are always touched by the mystery that surrounds our existence, they see no need to posit a special and decisive historical revelation of this mystery.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

If we need to see heavy breathing stuff we can always surf for pron.

Phrygian to me i sense that you are struggling with issues in your mind that you cant reconcile and these issues are affecting what you believe in your heart and therefore your faith in God.I had something similar happen to me recently regarding the story of the demon possessed man at one point the demons begged Jesus to cast them into the pigs does that mean that Jesus was implicated with the work of satan.It cast my mind into doubt and then i began to question who God is.I prayed and sort the holy spirit for an answer the answer i got was that Gods character never changes he is always holy righteous and sovereign why else would satan ask for his permission.So the answer was that he allowed satans purpose to prevail so that we can see that satans intention is always to destroy it may well have been that the pigs were his anyway.As they were for the gentile nations who offered the pigs to their demon Gods.Just as satan can not change who he is the destroyer the thief the liar God can not change who he is when we realise that despite what we see going on in the world God is still the same yesterday today and forever.The time is coming when those that have hurt others will be judged for there wickedness as we serve a holy and just God.Just as it was in the times of Noah so it is with this this generation that as the wickedness reachs its zenith then the Lord will return to judge the nations.He is coming again and we need to be ready it is not a time to be caught sleeping.brentnz

Indeed, whatever his disguise, he can project for those who need it the commanding and challenging image of one who has taken the hard way and stayed the course — who, like Milton's Satan, will always choose heroic autonomy over «ignoble ease,» and who, like Twain's Satan and Lenny Bruce, knows bullshit when he sees it.

For in that, we will see that God has given you and me everything we need to be the person we have always wanted to be.

The vicar of christ on earth has a very oppulent lifestyle and always needs more money, actually they are doing quite well but greed is greed; I can't come up with a new testament verse to prove the point but see George Carlin as a reference.

The persuasiveness of religious programs toward change appear to be greatest when they are viewed by a person who is in a state of attitude imbalance or transition and seeking new forms of gratification for his or her needs; when they are viewed by a person for whom religious faith has always been a viable, if not vital, option; when the options being presented are seen as realistic and leading to a desirable end; when opportunity for demonstration exists in proximate distance to the viewing situation; and when the attitude or behavior is not central to the individual's self - concept and ego - functioning.

I see a need for the church to be involved in the issue in society (which are alsmost always, in some aspect, political).

These are important questions we need to ask ourselves, while always holding out the love and compassion that our faith in Christ requires in seeing all people as God's children, and that his family transcends national borders.

The Bible is clear that God's people always had a responsibility to see that everyone in their society was cared for at a basic - needs level.

In the church he spoke in German, and enjoyed the Saxon idiom, often quoting from an Aesop fable, or from some well - known saying; always there was the quality of speaking to people's own needs, seeing into their deepest felt concerns.

What I most disrespect, however, are those megachurch dudes screeching that God wants us to have money, it is his design for us to be rich and we need only find the key (seems implied there is always «you give me your money and I will see to it that God makes you comfortable»).

Cupidity (lack, want, need, our own «poor» we have with us always desire) is traditionally seen as root of evil (malorum).

Pleased to see an egg white in the recipe too, always have an egg white or 6 hanging about in the fridge or freezer (I freeze them labelling the amount on the bag, makes it easy to whip however many I need for a recipe), this also adds to the protein content of the bars along with the yoghurt content.

I am in New Jersey, and she is in Delaware, and we have always been very close, so it is nice to see what each other is up to, she gets to see photos of the boys, we can «chit chat» even when I can't sit down and have a phone conversation without someone needing to be fed, a diaper changed, in and out and in and out of the minivan, «Mommy mommy mommy mommy» echoing in the background (or in my face).

Came today b / c i'm in need of a cookie recipe (and you're always my first stop) and saw the buttered popcorn one... any chance of that recipe before the book comes out?

I'm always so glad to see the end of the school year, not just because I'll no longer have to get up at the crack of dawn to rouse children that are dead to the world, but also because after the stressful month of May I just need to decompress.

Being someone who is always following multiple passions myself, I would of course love to read and see more of the other things you are pursuing, but I also know that a lot of that happens offline and sometimes needs to stay that way.

I rarely cook with buckwheat (always eat it raw), but when I see in recipes like this, it reminds me that I need to cook with it more often!

best marble cake ever — love the combo — never used matcha but it always intrigues me — matcha macarons with ganache centres is what I think I would love to see made with it (of course I can't make macarons so just need to admire others)

I always have pasta, jasmine rice, a few kinds of beans (garbanzo and pinto at least), onions, canned tomatoes, tomato paste, and vegetable bouillon in my kitchen (plus olive oil, balsamic vinegar, flour, sugar, salt, pepper, and spices - start at the most versatile and see what you need).

Making my own sausage is something I've always wanted to do, but after seeing the process of grinding, stuffing, curing or smoking, I decided to take the easy way out and choose a sausage that doesn't need any of that.

I do see him becoming a legend, fan need to stop the media new because they a re always negative towards us

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

It's always nice to give the players game - time but we will wait to Sunday to see what we need to during the game.»

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

Ei for arsenal the next game is always a panic station because of one or two things.However i am always scared when i see a certain three players in the team.They are not supposed to be there yet keep being there.I do not want to mention names but just start from the defense to the attack and you might know them.By the way i hope Walcott plays we need someone like him to be inform because he can really help us.

In my opinion I've always seen Giroud play better when he's used as an impact sub, and maybe that's exactly what he needs to get going.

So as i see we have great (if not the best in the world with bayern) creative midfielders in the world but we just have to goal scorers (alexis and giroud) so these two platers that supposed to score the goals for us must be catogery A + We are having one in alexis but the second scorer and he is even important as he is our striker is not an A + not even A I love this guy called giroud he always gives his best but just his abilities are nit good enough we simply need an A + and he will score for fun for us