And you can
always take more risks in bedrooms because they're separate from the rest of the space and don't have as much flow.
Do all managers
always take more risks when offered incentive compensation?»»
We can't trust society to do the right thing, people that have little to lose will
always take more risks.
The first result is that more financial literate households do not
always take more risk but their risk exposures vary with market regimes (for example, a 1 % increase in the expected excess return of risky assets is associated with a 2 % increase in the risky share for each unit of financial literacy).
Not exact matches
He must really
risk mutual discussion with the world, must
take for granted that he will not only teach but learn thereby, that the whole truth is
always richer and
more mysterious than what he has already explicitly grasped, that between the real truth of yesterday, today and tomorrow there exists a deeper hidden agreement than is realized either by insensitive innovators or diehard defenders of the old at any price.
«No, I wouldn't say «I
take more risks than the average person... We'll
always do our research.
I get your point mate.But in truth Ramsey is the CM and Xhaka is the DM according to our formation anf tactic.It's even debatable if Xhaka is capable of playing DM.I think Ramsey's tactical awareness is poor but he has every right to
take risks and move into the opposition box.He's a box to box player.The only problem is Ramsey overdoes it.If we had a proper CDM the team would be
more balanced.Now it's like we have two CM's playing in midfield and due to their poor tactical awareness we're
always left exposed.I conclude by reminding people that Wilshere is better footballer and is
more intelligent than Xhaka.It'll be better playing Wilshere and pairing him with a CDM than having Xhaka play there.He just gets to play over him becausr we signed him for # 35.
There's obviously a certain amount of
risk associated with drafting the «older» guys, but I think you could argue there's just as much if not
more risk when
taking guys out of high school, considering they typically haven't faced as polished of talent in conjunction with the fact they're almost
always going to cost you
more.
-- We all knew Diaby is
always a
risk — We all knew it will
take Theo a long time to get back — We all knew players coming from the WC could pick up knocks (OG / Ozil / Kos / Debuchy)-- We all knew Sanogo's record in the nursing room — We all knew Arteta / TR7 ages (with age, some players pick up
more knocks than ever)-- We all knew Ramsey / Wilshere / Chambo / Gibbs don't go season long without injuries — We all knew Wenger's zip coat could start acting up
«Perhaps the most important finding is that three - quarters of the public are not aware of reports of a sizable increase in the number of ticks this summer and are therefore no
more likely than in previous years to
always take steps to reduce the
risks of being bitten,» said Humphrey Taylor, chairman emeritus of The Harris Poll.
But our belief that natural is
always good — and
more natural is even better — can lead us to
take alarming
risks, treating these supplements like food without considering the potential side effects many have.
I've
always been pretty safe with my looks, but slowly I am
taking more risks.
They definitely inspire me to
take more risks and
always stay on top of the fashion trends.
I've learned
more and
more that life is short so
take risks, live the life you
always dreamed of... WHY NOT??
She leans toward
more simple and classic pieces, while I have
always loved trends and
taking more risks.
Those early in their careers certainly should
take more risk because over time markets have
always recovered and increased in value substantially as this last nine years has proven.
In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had
more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often
takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the
always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of
risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and
risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or
more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the big picture, and only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it
Always take enough profit to pay for your trade, and never
risk more than you can afford to lose.
But, those looking to get rich quick will
always be the ones
taking more risks - some fail, but the ones who do score big seem to score really big!
When one trend follows they
always want to buy the strongest shares as long as they do not
risk more than 1 % of their account size on that particular trade (you decide how much
risk you want to
take when trend following, this is my -LSB-...]
Berky is almost
always willing to
take on catastrophe
risks, if they are
more than adequately compensated.
You don't
always get
more return on average if you
take more risk.
I've
always said you shouldn't
take more risk than you need to.
With the implementation of virtual 7.1 there's
always the
risk of the audio becoming
more muddled and less defined than standard stereo as the software or hardware attempts to
take stereo sound, then split it to replicate sitting in a room with numerous speakers.
It might seem that assigned
risk policies would
always be
more costly, since the company is forced to
take on a driver, but this is not necessarily true.
Guaranteed issue
always costs
more because they are
taking on many very high
risk people.
You can compare for yourself: AICPA Level Term Life Instant Quotes Individual Instant Life Insurance Quotes Since group coverage
takes all
risks (healthy and unhealthy), it's almost
always going to be
more expensive for the people in average to good health.»
(There is some
risk banks won't
always extend a larger LOC, but as your balance sheet grows this becomes a smaller and smaller
risk) Additionally, if you have a 30 year am and have an extra couple hundred bucks in cash flow each month, that extra cash flow (by itself) is not easily converted into real estate that will get you 15 % returns... it
takes time for that extra cash flow to grow large enough to
take down that next deal which will provide 15 % returns or
more, so it likely sits in a bank account earning negligible interest until it is large enough to
take down the next deal.
The best part is that returns made on your real estate investments are
always worth
more than the
risk taken.