Because it's about a woman, it's almost
always used against a woman (and sometimes gay men).
If there is a delay in seeking treatment after an accident, the insurance company will
always use this against you.
Not exact matches
But while manned aircraft can usually fight back
against signal jamming, and pilots in a cockpit can
always use their own judgment if communications or navigation is lost, jamming could pose a serious threat to the US Navy's drones, as there's no one in the cockpit, according to Lamrani.
Although cyber attacks
against businesses like the recent one
against Yahoo are increasing, hackers are
using the same techniques they
always have.
To protect
against this type of attack, we advise all users to
always use a strong password and enable two - step verification.
By extension the LXX [21]
always uses it to portray a rebellion
against God (Joshua 22:22; 2 Chronicles 29:19).»
If we are
against the
use of stem cell research on the basis of embryonic destruction, shouldn't we also be
against in - vitro fertilization clinics because there are
always excess embryos that get discarded?
By extension the LXX [21]
always uses it to portray a rebellion
against God (Joshua 22:22; 2 Chr.onicles 29:19).»
Always with the schmutz of Jewish human - interest stories, but never a scathing look at the Nazi - like tactics
used against Palestinians?
Faith has
always been
used as an excuse to commit crimes
against humanity for the last 6000 years of recorded history, and it has
always been a delusion.
I've been frustrated by the bloggers with influence who have
used their voice and influence in this situation in a manner similar to Warnock, basically instituting the «
always be nice» and «don't talk rules»
against those who have experienced abuse.
First, as the title of a key chapter puts it, the American example shows that religion can «Make
Use of Democratic Instincts» in a manner mutually beneficial to itself and democracy; second, sustainable democracy needs religion, which means we can expect democratic peoples to remain attached to its continuance or at least potentially receptive to its revival (cf. II, 2.17, # s 17 - 20); third, democratic times, because they are enlightened times, tend to be ones of increasing doubts about religion; fourth, the relevant religion for America and Europe, Christianity, will be tugged
against and perhaps eroded by powerful and ongoing democratic currents toward liberationist and materialist mores; and fifth, religion's authority in democratic society will
always rest upon common opinion.
On the one hand, there is a strong resistance to the
use of military power, rising in some Roman Catholic documents and papal statements to a «presumption
against war» and the suggestion that recourse to military power is
always bad.
I
always love how people who oppose the Church's teaching on genetic engineering, hom0s3xuality and marriage turn around and
use them as slurs
against someone.
There will
always be people of ill intent who want to
use words as weapons, but they must be allowed to exist so that resonable people can
use words as weapons
against true enemies of freedom.
While it is true that elkō can be
used to drag someone
against their will (cf. Acts 16:19; 21:30; Jas 2:6), when elkō is translated as «drag» it is
always with malicious intent.
You seem to indicate that no Christians were sent over to Vietnam
against their wishes, your head is either in the sand or up your... Governments have
always used religions to control the populace, that is why they are allowed to exist, read some history, please.
I'm
against a lot of stuff that our society
uses, but it's there, and it's
always been there, so why complain?
This ought to be a reminder that it discloses what will
always be the world's attitude to the church and what arguments will be
used to the end of history in the world's case
against it.
Theology, Biblical knowledge and condemning others, when
used against others,
always,
always,
always loses and serves only to show that we're totally missing Jesus» message.
We may find it instructive that in human relations forgiveness
always threatens to become a kind of weapon which men
use against one another, for the very act of forgiveness implies a judgment.
For those who are not yet convinced of my lunacy, I'd like to finish with a word on the statement that, «Faith has
always been
used as an excuse to commit crimes
against humanity...» I will grant you that at some points in history, humans have
used faith «as an excuse to commit crimes
against humanity.»
It's pretty easy to see that Colson is not calling for an end to contraception (because Protestants have
always used it, and they might not be too interested in outlawing it) but a «catechism» of church members in a war
against Obama.
It's important to
always note Romans II when
using Romans I to speak out
against ho - mos - exuality.
And I
always enjoyed hearing the word
against used in that manner, sorta old school and experience, oh there it is again.
Some recipes call for almond flour or a combination of coconut flour and some arrowroot powder, but the cookie we
always have in the freezer
uses almond butter as a base and was created by Danielle Walker of
Against all Grain blog and several cookbooks.
They are playing very good, but like us who
always crack
against teams like chelsea, manure, bec we are so damn
used to lose
against them no matter their form is, spurs will also lose
against us bec we are that boogi team to them.
Call me unambitious but I will
always say the league cup is not worth the hassle, its I Micky mouse cup that should only be
used to test young players I didn't want us to win it
against Chelsea or Birmingham I fact I was partly cheering for the bromies we should be focusing on the league and maybe the F.A cup.
That leaves only his pace which is the only attribute he has, but with teams
always parking the bus
against us, he barely gets to
use that pace.
Everyone time I defend this club (and having to do so
against OUR OWN FANS is a completely different issue), one of the main points people
always use to criticise Arsenal with, is the utterly embarrassing manner in which our own «fans» constantly attack the players, manager and the board.
It's a big game for both teams, and it's
always fun to watch Dwight Howard battle Tim Duncan and James Harden
using Manu Ginobili's old tricks
against him.
Let's just all agree that it's
always a bad idea to
use a «the world is screwed up, and we're
against that: buy this unrelated product» conceit.
Maybe Whiz can figure out how to
use a play that
always works
against the Chargers in short yardage: The play action fake to Gordon, with a pass in the flat to the left side tight end.
Theo Walcott is more
used to playing on the wing, and there have
always been doubts over Olivier Giroud's ability to perform
against the biggest teams.
Maybe Arsenal have a number of players who are not mentally strong enough to deal with the whole world turning
against them, Wenger never picks on individuals and will
always include himself in negatives so to assume that Wenger is totally oblivious due to the words he
uses then maybe they are as mentally weak as some of our players are.
While teams must
always show respect to each other, showing too much is a problem, and England will surely want to
use this as an opportunity to make a statement that they're serious contenders next summer, while the younger group will be battling to get a spot in his final squad not coming along for the experience of playing
against Brazil.
I could get
used to watching Matt Harvey
against Alex Gordon with the game on the line, and the Royals» defense is
always a treat.
We should
use him more in league matches too... I noticed the Ox is
always full of mistake and hardly perform each time he starts a match, he's
always more better when he comes on as a sub to play
against tiring legs.
The problem is quality opposition will
ALWAYS use that gap
against us and it's cost us time and again.
The Hoos looked to
use an off week to recoup from a disappointing road loss
against Maryland and prepare for an
always difficult Georgia Tech squad.
Giroud does not deserve to lead the arsenal line next season.He should be replaced do u know why?It is because he is
always going to miss a lot of chances and will cost us.people who support him to lead the line have not studied his game clearly.every season he will continue to cost us.But at least i wont say he is useless or something.He is on the pitch and gives his all so he is useful.He is not clinical and not good at all.He is a striker who is just above average but sometimes even performs below average in his 3 years over here.Be honest and say it as it is.Some people
use stats to constantly defend him yet if you watch him you will be shocked.Walcott can lead the line he has everything to.but as i said he lacks the aggressiveness and physique to be the main man.that will go
against him so many times.so its better for him to remain on the wings.Giroud does not deserve it.We all know that.
Fans have short memories and the FA cup shut many people up because they
always hope for better, Silent stan has
used this
against us and you won't see ticket prices drop OR any huge spending in the transfer window, BUT there will be a massive amount of money coming in and its up to us to ask «where is it all going if its not being reinvested into the transfer market or in cutting ticket prices?.
It was a common tactic that even weaker opposition
used to deploy
against us, to apply a hard midfield press as we'd
always try to play through it.
A manager should learn to rotate players according to their form and should know how to
use the right tactics
against every opponent, unfortunately Wenger is no longer able to do either of these which is why we
always appear to have no back bone.
When executing analysis like this, we
always prefer
using against the spread (ATS) records as a measure of how a team, or player in this instance, performs because point spreads include a level of «expectation» that straight - up wins and losses do not.
«It brings a whole new challenge, and as a footballer that's what you're
always looking for, to test your ability
against players you're not
used to competing
against and different teams that play a different brand of football.
Up front, Giroud worked hard, but surely needs to get some shooting practice, as chances
against the top teams, are ones you
always have to make the best
use of.
«And then you're
always playing catch - up, confidence drops a little bit and you're fighting
against things you're not
used to fighting
against.
Ezra, Eboue has started to improve his game and we should all acknowledge this... he even had a good game
against Roma in the first leg... Walcott is an impact player and we should
use him in the 2nd half, he can cause all sorts of problems when Roma are trying to push for the Kill... Song can be replaced with Diaby but
always keep in mind that the CL is open and not like the league... Song and Eboue linked well
against Burnley and if given a chance they may also translate this to the CL.
I think he was a bit impetious to prove a point as he is a front foot defender, but after Carroll knocked him about he soon learnt that the Premier League is a step up from Holland / Mexico / Colombia and that he can't
always use force
against an opponent.