The Committee reiterates its view that the Mabo case and the 1993 Native Title Act constituted a significant development in the recognition of indigenous peoples» rights, but that the 1998
amendments wind back some of the protections previously offered to indigenous peoples, and provide legal certainty for government and third parties at the expense of indigenous title.
At its sixty - sixth session in February / March 2005, the Committee again reiterated its view that the Mabo case and the Native Title Act constituted a significant development in the recognition of Indigenous peoples» rights, but that the 1998
amendments wound back some of the protections previously offered to Indigenous peoples, and provided legal certainty to government and third parties at the expense of Indigenous title.
Not exact matches
The requirement of effective participation is particularly important where certain
amendments have the effect of
winding back previously enjoyed rights.
I commend the Government for its earlier decision to consider only those
amendments which are «not designed to
wind back native title».