The Justice Department's
amicus brief states that the «sole question» is whether «Title VII reaches sexual orientation discrimination,» and concludes that «it does not, as has been settled for decades.»
Not exact matches
On Sunday and Monday, 127 Bay Area companies filed an
amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
stating their opposition against the president's executive order on immigration.
E.g., in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17
state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an
amicus curiae
brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana
state law requiring the teaching of creationism, which the
brief described as embodying religious dogma.
In 1986, an
amicus curiae
brief, signed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17
state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, asked the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard, to reject a Louisiana
state law requiring the teaching of creationism (which the
brief described as embodying religious dogma).
Mass Audubon has submitted an
amicus brief to the Berkshire Superior Court in support of the Massachusetts Attorney General's office for their defense against the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Connecticut Expansion, a proposed natural gas pipeline project that is trying to remove protections on
state land designated for permanent conservation.
National and
state gay rights organizations filed an
amicus brief to challenge Utah's gay marriage ban before the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.
Utah's ban on gay marriage harms the children of gays and lesbians, despite arguments the
state has made to the contrary, according to an
amicus brief filed Tuesday by a group of national and
state gay rights organizations.
New York
state will file an
amicus brief in support of overturning a North Carolina law that critics say violates the civil rights of LGBT people by prohibiting municipalities from issuing ordinances that allow transgender people to use the bathroom of the gender they identify with.
Sixteen
state attorneys general — including New York's Eric Schneiderman — along with Washington D.C. filed an
amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the
state of Hawaii's case against the Trump administration's latest ban prohibiting travel from several majority - Muslim nations.
NYC Public Advocate Tish James and other officials argued in an
amicus brief that a shooting victims» families should be able to sue Walmart in
state court for negligence for selling handgun ammunition to a customer they charge was too young to legally buy it and visibly drunk.
He says the
state will file an
amicus brief in support of the lawsuit filed by Lamba Legal, the ACLU and Equality North Carolina seeking to overturn the law.
Poughkeepsie... Dutchess County Executive Marcus Molinaro filed an
amicus - curiae
brief today with the United
State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in support of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation and the Public Service Commission of the
State of New York's motion seeking to stay the implementation of a new capacity zone ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
The city of Syracuse is among more than 30 cities, municipalities and organizations across the United
States that are on a legal
brief known as
amicus brief in a lawsuit filed by Chicago against Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The city recently filed an
amicus brief with the United
States Supreme Court in Janus v. American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al., which is challenging the right of unions to collect dues from all employees who benefit from collective bargaining.
[Box 26] AAAS and Congress, lobbying, 1959 - 1987 Congress, 1986 Arctic, 1981 Legislative Branch, 1981 - 1984 Executive Branch, pre-1985 OMB Circular, 1983 Science Policy: A Working Glossary, 1978 Science Policy Task Force Congressional Research Service, 1986 Environmental Protection Agency House Committee on Science and Technology, 1986 Office of Management and Budget Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1982 Office of Technology Assessment, 1980 Senate
State Department (2 Folders) AAAS Science, Engineering, and Diplomacy Fellows, Lunch and Orientation, 1983 Tax Bills, 1981 Edwards vs Aguilard, Louisiana Creationist Suit, 1986 Edwards vs Aguilard, NAS
amicus brief Edwards vs Aguilard, People for the American Way
amicus brief Edwards vs Aguilard, Supreme Court arguments Hutchinson vs. Proxmire,
amicus brief, 1978 Southeastern College vs. Frances Davis,
amicus brief, 1979
State Department, 1976 - 1984 Human Subjects Research, 1979 Controversy over Inhaber Article in Science, 1979 Three Mile Island, 1979 Federal appropriations, universities and pork barrel projects
06, Ed.D.» 11, is serving as counsel of record for the Civil Rights Project at UCLA in an
amicus curiae, or friend of the court,
brief filed for a case set to be argued before the United
States Supreme Court.
12, and Matthew Shaw filed an
amicus curiae, or friend of the court,
brief supporting the University of Texas at Austin (UT) in Fisher v. University of Texas, a United
States Supreme Court case regarding UT's race - conscious admissions policies.
Yet such a decision would bring the most persistent and pervasive aspect of that conflict nearer to a close; it is no wonder, then, that the National Education Association has filed an
amicus brief in support of the
state.
Ed School Affiliates Argue for University of Texas Harvard Crimson, October 16, 2012» [Philip] Lee and fellow doctoral student Matthew P. Shaw put that belief into practice in August by filing an
amicus brief with the United
States Supreme Court in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas.
An
amicus curiae
brief filed on behalf of almost 30
States, focusing on these practical consequences, claims with some justification that «each of the undersigned states... would suffer severe financial stringency.&
States, focusing on these practical consequences, claims with some justification that «each of the undersigned
states... would suffer severe financial stringency.&
states... would suffer severe financial stringency.»
Alexandria, Va. (February 9, 2016)-- The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joins the
State and Local Legal Center (SLLC) in filing a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Seventh Circuit's decision in Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc..
Alexandria, Va. (June 9, 2015)- The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Louisiana School Boards Association (LSBA), the Mississippi School Boards Association (MSBA), the Texas Association of School Boards» (TASB) Legal Assistance Fund, and the National Association of
State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), filed a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (LA, MS, TX) in support of the school district in Seth B. v. Orleans Parish School District.
A fine example is the recent, unprecedented filing by Houston high school students of an
amicus brief in the Texas school funding case now on appeal to that
state's Supreme Court.
The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Louisiana School Boards Association (LSBA), the Mississippi School Boards Association (MSBA), the Texas Association of School Boards» (TASB) Legal Assistance Fund, and the National Association of
State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), filed a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief in the U.S.
The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by eight
state school boards associations, today filed a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of D.A. v. Meridian Joint Sch.
The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Louisiana School Boards Association (LSBA), the Mississippi School Boards Association (MSBA), the Texas Association of School Boards» (TASB) Legal Assistance Fund, and the National Association of
State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), filed a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (LA, MS, TX) in support of the school district in Seth B. v. Orleans Parish School District.
In their joint
brief, NSBA, LSBA, MSBA, TASB, and NASDSE (hereafter, the
amici) argued that the Fifth Circuit's ruling should impose reasonable limits on school districts» responsibility to pay for special education evaluations by requiring that IEEs meet
state criteria as a prerequisite for reimbursement of costs.
E4E - LA member Lisa Alva Wood, who filed an
amicus brief in the case, tells how the overturning of Reed v.
State of California is a «shame».
The following seventeen organizations joined the
amicus brief: National School Boards Association, Ohio School Boards Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Professional Society on Abuse of Children, American School Counselors Association, Buckeye Association of School Administrators, Council of Administrators of Special Education, International Municipal Lawyers Association, National Association of Elementary School Principals, National Association of School Psychologists, National Association of Secondary School Principals, National Association of
State Directors of Special Education, Ohio Association of School Business Officials, Ohio Educational Service Center Association, Ohio Federation of Teachers, School Social Workers of America Association, and Council for Exceptional Children.
Alexandria, Va., October 14, 2016 — The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Michigan Association of School Boards (MASB), the School Superintendents Association (AASA), Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO), and National Association of
State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), filed a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools.
State of New York v. Marquan W. Mackey - Meggs AFC signed on to an
amicus brief drafted and filed by the law firm Morrison & Foerster LLP before the New York
State Court of Appeals regarding Albany County's Cyber-bullying Law.
Lawyers for the N.C. Justice Center, a statewide anti-poverty advocacy group that the N.C. Policy Watch is a project under, filed an
amicus brief to encourage the judge to send the virtual charter school's application back to the
state board.
CIR filed an
amicus brief in a 2012 case challenging California's Prop. 209 on the grounds that a
state constitutional amendment barring the use of racial preferences was itself illegal racial discrimination.
And WILL filed an
amicus brief in Duncan v. Nevada supporting the universal voucher program providing taxpayer money for private and religious schools, struck down by that
state's highest court.
October 14, 2016 — The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Michigan Association of School Boards (MASB), the School Superintendents Association (AASA), Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO), and National Association of
State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), filed a «friend of the court» (
amicus)
brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools.
NSBA joined a large group of national organizations representing public officials and their attorneys in an
amicus brief supporting the
state of South Dakota's attempt to collect sales tax from online retailers...
See the
State of Washington
amicus brief from the attorney general filed in that class action.
The Humane Society of the United
States and Texas Humane Legislation Network submit
amicus brief in support of The Licensed Breeders Act
The Humane Society of the United
States and Texas Humane Legislation Network filed an
amicus brief with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas asking the court to uphold the
state's new puppy and kitten mill law.
In addition, as nine
state attorneys general argue in their June 25, 2014
amicus brief, the Senate's conforming amendment is «clearly» a drafting error «because it sought to make a clerical correction to Section 111 (d) rendered unnecessary by a superseding substantive amendment.»
Eight days later, nine
states led by West Virginia filed an
amicus brief in support of the petition.
Entergy is fighting the applicability of the
state coastal program in court, and Scenic Hudson joined with Riverkeeper and the Hudson River Sloop Clearwater to file an amicus brief supporting New York S
state coastal program in court, and Scenic Hudson joined with Riverkeeper and the Hudson River Sloop Clearwater to file an
amicus brief supporting New York
StateState.
These columns and editorials came on the heels of a strongly worded
amicus brief filed by 15
state attorneys general, including Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman, in support of the energy industry last week.
For example, if you assisted with the preparation of an
amicus brief, that achievement should be specifically detailed on your resume, as opposed to
stating that you assisted in the preparation of legal documents.
Law professor Seth Barrett Tillman of Ireland's Maynooth University submitted an
amicus brief arguing that the emoluments clause doesn't apply to the president of the United
States, igniting an argument among legal historians, the New York Times reported in September.
U.S. Chamber files
amicus brief urging Supreme Court to grant review to decide whether the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause applies to the
States
U.S. Chamber files coalition
amicus brief urging Supreme Court to hold Stored Communications Act does not require company to provide emails stored outside United
States
Moreover, the U.S.
State Department — whose Office of Children's Issues serves as the Central Authority for the United
States under the Convention has long espoused and argued for — such an interpretation and the U.S. Government submitted an
amicus brief supporting the father's position.
Indeed, FLP filed an
amicus brief in the National Veterans Legal case
stating that the FLP is a «nonprofit organization established in 2013 to provide free, public, and permanent access to primary legal materials on the internet for educational, charitable, and scientific purposes to the benefit of the general public and the public interest.»
An
amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court (at the Court's request) by the Department of Justice noted that «actuarial risk assessments» had been used in trials since 1923, and the National Center for
State Courts favoured their use.