There are problems with Popperâ $ ™ s theory and it is fair to say that he has long been unfashionable
among philosophers of science.
A broad stream of opinion
among philosophers of science holds that coherence of explanations or theories is a necessary or at least a «conducive» criterion for truth.
The received view
among philosophers of science, whether they be of a regularity or necessity persuasion, is that a statement s is a law statement or nomological generalization if and only if it satisfies the following logically necessary specifications:
Among philosophers of science the «idealists» emphasize the role of man's mind and the structure of ideas, while the «realists» emphasize the objective structure of the physical world.
Not exact matches
This theological perspective has a profound implications for the correction
of the scientific epistemology, which tends to regard as the objective and objectifying process, although nowadays there are efforts to correct this situation
among the scientists and
philosophers of science.
Karl Popper, second to none
among living (now, 1996, no longer)
philosophers of science, defends indeterminism, as do Dirac and Wheeler,
among the more creative
of living scientists, including some biologists.
A view held by many contemporary metaphysicians is that the problem
of induction, so much discussed by
philosophers of science, arises only because
of mistaken metaphysical views; in particular views (deriving from Hume) about the nature
of the causal relation and / or about the internal relations
among different entities.1 Contrary to this view, I will try...
The French
philosopher Etienne Gilson did attempt to address the impact
of science while remaining faithful to the tradition, and his book From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again: A Journey in Final Causality (1972) is still influential
among some neo-scholastics.
I have suggested, however, that
science is not as objective, nor religion as subjective, as the view dominant
among philosophers of religion has held.
Indeed the lack
of serious engagement by
philosophers with
science, particularly physics, is all too apparent, including
among most
philosophers and theologians within the Church during the last century.
Amartya Sen, winner
of the Nobel Prize in economics, is university professor at Harvard, formerly master
of Trinity College, Cambridge, and also a
philosopher, with a prodigious and influential bibliography on technical issues in economics, welfare economics, economic development, social philosophy, the role
of the non-Western world in world civilization, and the importance
of Indian thought and
science,
among other topics.
We discuss,
among other topics, about photography in the Middle East with Peggy Sue Amison, artistic director at East Wing; net art and networked cultures with Josephine Bosma, Amsterdam - based journalist and critic; urban digital art and criticality in the media city with curator and researcher Tanya Toft; art and technology with curator Chris Romero; the politics
of surveillance and international security with political scientist David Barnard - Wills; art and architecture with Maaike Lauwaert, visual arts curator at Stroom, an independent centre for art and architecture in the Netherlands; the intersections
of art, law and
science with curator and cultural manager Daniela Silvestrin; the architecture
of sacred places with curator Jumana Ghouth; the historical legacy
of feminism today with Betty Tompkins and Marilyn Minter; hacktivism and net culture with curator and researcher Tatiana Bazzichelli; culture, place and memory with Norie Neumark, director
of the Centre for Creative Arts in Melbourne; anthropology and the tactical use
of post-digital technologies with artist and
philosopher Mitra Azar; or feminism and the digital arts with curator Tina Sauerländer.
Among the authors are academics from the fields
of art and cultural
science, curators, journalists,
philosophers, writers, artists, critics, political scientists, patrons, and migration researchers who are debating art and (inter) nationality including Geoff Dyer, Jacques Mandelbaum, Santu Mofokeng, Uli Sigg, Mark Terkessidis, Ranjit Hoskote, Aveek Sen, François Jullien, Simon Njami, Jeff Kelley, and Gilles Kepel.