Sentences with phrase «among respected scientists»
Their arguments are few: • I haven't seen real change in Iowa, just the usual variability (from an Iowa farmer) • there is disagreement among respected scientists, so I can take whatever position I want and run with it, loudly and forcefully (a popular argument in all discussions, although scientists in the same position often become less assertive about their position).
http://www.culturalcognition.net/ Not exact matches
Micheletti and his research group have been among the first to work in that respect and are an authoritative voice in the field, so much that the Physics of Life Reviews has chosen to ask the scientist himself this review.
I suspect the most widespread view, held by practising scientists as well as by the minority of enthusiasts among the public, is that science is the engine of progress within society and as such ought to be accorded more respect than it usually is.
Noted Swedish Scientist to Join Scripps Florida Faculty - «I'm very much looking forward to pursuing my work in Palm Beach County among some of the most respected researchers in the world,» says Professor Claes Wahlestedt.
However, underlying these public assurances about PUFA is a lot of controversy among respected nutrition scientists.
With well - articulated essays in leading media, Cheney took out after the educationists and won the respect of mathematicians and scientists as she helped raise awareness among a wider audience across the United States.
Animal Ethics was formed to carry out outreach to provide information about the reasons to respect all animals, to promote discussion and debate about issues in animal ethics and among academics and scientists and to do research and provide resources for animal advocates.
On many concrete issues the Church has no reason to propose a final word and understands that it must listen to and promote honest debate among scientists, respecting the diversity of opinion.
There are some interesting quotes from climate scientists in this article that highlight a large degree of uncertainty with respect to the climate system, and the human role in it, even among scientists closely involved with the IPCC reports.
By Peter Gleick, President Emeritus and Chief Scientist December 2016 Among the different professional categories, scientists and engineers remain very highly respected by the public, at least compared to politicians, business leaders, the media, and even religious authorities.
As a Fellow of the Geological Society of America (GSA), I periodically blog on their open forum and on their Climate Community website and among other things, I have been accused of «being on the payroll of the Koch brothers,» and when posting a link to Svensmark's video on clouds accused of doing science by u-tube,» and a few other choice things from so - called respected «scientists.»
The university has an enviably small carbon footprint and its scientists are among the most respected for their work in global warming.
:) PS: If economists are trying to improve their standing in the academic world (eg, gain some minimum level of respect among real scientists), you are certainly not helping things one iota with your nutball stuff.
With all due respect, someone who publicly calls a leading scientist «close minded» and «non-scientist», among numerous other outrageous and unsubstantiated accusations, has some nerve in describing Neven's very gentle, very respectful criticism «personalizing» the issue.
Just one among very many serious shortcomings of this UN organisation and it is by no means only scientifically untrained investigative journalists who have got the IPCC's number; many respected scientists have also openly criticised the workings and the conclusions of this bloated organisation.
On remand from Daubert, the lower court's unease with this new task was clearly evident: «Our responsibility, then, unless we misread the Supreme Court's opinion is to resolve disputes among respected, well credentialed scientists about matters squarely within their expertise, in areas where there is no scientific consensus as to what is or what is not «good science,» and occasionally to reject such expert testimony because it was not «derived by the scientific method.»
The fact that judges, typically untrained in science, need to «resolve disputes among respected, well - credentialed scientists about matters squarely within their expertise,» a «daunting task,» seems to suggest that lawyers could too.