Sentences with phrase «among skeptical scientists»

A separate agreed programme among skeptical scientists to cooperate to advance specific areas would help because it would focus attention on how the science isn't settled, and focus the use of scarce resources to best effect.

Not exact matches

A previous letter with nearly identical language was sent by 18 of the 31 organizations in 2009 (pdf), and some scientists are skeptical that this new document will budge the stubborn persistence of climate denial among congressional representatives.

The e-mail exchanges among several prominent American and British climate - change scientists appear to reveal efforts to keep the work of skeptical scientists out of major journals and the possible hoarding and manipulation of data to overstate the case for human - caused climate change.

Among the rogues gallery of leading climate change deniers are (from left to right, top to bottom): Congressman Joe Barton (R - TX), fossil fuel shill Steve Milloy, media mogul Rupert Murdoch, self - styled «Skeptical Environmentalist» Bjorn Lomborg, scientist - turned - denier - for - hire Fred Singer, the inimitable Sarah Palin, conservative funders Charles and David Koch (aka the Koch Brothers), and «swift - boat» architect Marc Morano.

While some individual scientists are skeptical about the tenets of human - driven climate change, there is a broad consensus among climatologists — 97 percent to 98 percent of them agree that climate change is occurring and that it is driven by human activity, according to a 2010 paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

(Skeptical Science) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has been based.

It is «hard» scientists who disagreements with their work, but there is even disagreement among these skeptical «hard» scientists.

The scientists among you, start finally accepting offers for real debate with «skeptical» scientists on scientific grounds a. (People like Judith, von Storch and a handful others are certainly open for this, although some may consider them «heretic» or even «skeptic» because of their openness or because they don't declare every single bad weather event as proof of AGW).

Doug, your claims that the Second Law of Thermodynamics means that the greenhouse gas effect is wrong has been debunked by your fellow deniers of industrial climate disruption (at Tallbloke's site among others) as well as by credible scientists (for example, many of the commenters at Skeptical Science).

There's barely a climate scientist among the signatories, and their critique relies on the rewarmed leftovers of skeptical claims - long since shown to be wrong - headed.