Not exact matches
In fact, when social
scientists contemplate the mutually conditioning relations
among human development, family structures, law, commerce, and the overall culture, their situation is similar to that of natural
scientists trying to make sense of such complex phenomena as the long - range
weather or turbulence in fluids.
Overall, the consensus
among meteorologists and other
scientists is that the European model is better overall in forecasting
weather.
While the
scientists had been hoping for a eureka moment, the results of their analysis still led them to consider that while space
weather isn't a primary driver of strandings, it could be one factor
among several.
Finally, almost 40 managers and
scientists met to discuss whether an adaptive management approach might be useful to gain an understanding of the interaction
among habitats and management actions and how this will be affected by annual
weather and climate patterns.
The theory, which is still debated by
scientists but gaining credence
among many, is based on pressure changes and other factors that cause the jet stream to plunge and
weather systems to get stuck.
Climate looks at the averages of
weather, and climate
scientists don't claim to know what will happen in any given time and place in the months and years ahead, just like actuaries don't know what will happen to any individual, but they've studied the average of things like life expectancies
among various large groups.
Nevertheless, the simplistic notion that climate variations consist of an analytic trend plus multidecadal periodic cycles hidden by higher - frequency «
weather noise» remains endemic
among those who feature themselves as «climate
scientists.»
Our
scientists are
among the world's foremost authorities on the development and use of remote sensing in
weather, climate and the environment.
We are told that there is an overwhelming agreement, or consensus,
among scientists that most
weather and climate changes that have occurred since the mid-20th century have been caused by human activity — our fossil fuel burning and CO2 emissions in particular.
Then along came people who referred to themselves as «climate
scientists» if only that they studied past
weather trends, along with current atmospheric effects,
among other things.
The
scientists among you, start finally accepting offers for real debate with «skeptical»
scientists on scientific grounds a. (People like Judith, von Storch and a handful others are certainly open for this, although some may consider them «heretic» or even «skeptic» because of their openness or because they don't declare every single bad
weather event as proof of AGW).
Among all
scientists, meteorologists are the best experts in
weather and climate.