It leaves only a fairly small
amount of warming attributable to CO2 emissions and therefore indicates a low sensitivity to increased atmospheric CO2.
Not exact matches
Look, peeps, I'm not now and never have been a «denier» but I am definitely a skeptic about the
amount of warming (1) that has occurred and (2) that is
attributable to CO2.
It is possible that, 20 years from now, we'll review the history and find that, in 2011, Loehle and Scafetta had published the most accurate assessment to date
of the
amount of global
warming attributable to anthropogenic GHGs.
The elements are: (1) the
amount of temperaturechange since 1850; (2) whether the change is in the range
of natural variability or is
attributable to humans; (3) the
amount of warming that greenhouse gases (CO2 and equivalents) will
warm the Earth in the future; and whether for the most likely scenarios, there are more losers than winners and if the change is just different.