It's a pity you have such trouble filtering your supportable ideas from your SWAGs, and that you can neither ignore
amusing snark nor return it effectively, which are the better strategies.
Choosing the «sarcastic» option could lead to
amusing snark, or could lead to you mocking a woman's grief over her dead child.
Not exact matches
I applaud people who have chosen that path and stick to it, and I must say I find it intensely tedious to listen to those cynical «vegan - bashers» who think they are
amusing as they
snark away at vegans without having any idea why they are even doing so, other than being threatened by something they don't understand, or by some vague aversion they have to any spiritual - sounding practice or «liberal - hippie - sounding» philosophy.
I was
amused and annoyed by the predictable
snark on Twitter in reaction to Pietsch's op - ed, but not really surprised.
The resulting bits of quasi-proclamation and pseudo-communication are both sinister and
amusing by turns, calling to mind the gentle
snark of Ed Ruscha's late - 1970s word pastels: «drug allergy fake» loiters just far enough from «radical wonton» to establish plausible deniability.
Webby — this is an open forum and while we are all prone to repitition either drop the
snarks or be original and or
amusing.