From this it follows that there may well be no such thing as
analogical discourse.
Clearly, all of this language about God must be understood as
analogical discourse.
But even if we allowed the possibility of
analogical discourse, could we attribute even the vaguest meaning to these terms when they are applied to infinite, necessary, simple Being?
Not exact matches
If this confuses us, we should recall that the strict rules of creaturely logic will at times tend to break down somewhat in the
analogical realms of theological
discourse.
Throughout the history of the church, risky anthropomorphisms in Christian
discourse were excused by appeal to the accommodated,
analogical, symbolic or poetic form of the scriptural revelation.
If we do not see the
analogical bond between the other forms of religious
discourse and prophetic
discourse we generalize in univocal fashion the concept of inspiration derived from the prophetic genre and assume that God spoke to the redactors of the sacred books just as he spoke to the prophets.
By reconciling imagination and reason, separated since the famous
Discourse on Method of Descartes, Varela and Simon refresh the
analogical thinking so precious to Leonardo da Vinci who says to us: «As the bolt rises which we screw in the nut, also will go up the helix which we screw in the air» The practice of the debate proposes a scenography of alive metaphors in a space of artificial intelligence.