To examine whether ethnic differences in relationship quality remained after controlling SES, we conducted univariate
analyses of covariance on (a) mother and father acceptance (adolescent report) and (b) diabetes conflicts with mothers (adolescent and mother report) and fathers (adolescent report), with SES as the covariate.
An analysis of the covariance on students» spring fluency scores across grades 2 - 6, using fall fluency scores as the covariate, revealed a significant effect for school: F (2, 344) = 4.68, p =.01.
An analysis of the covariance on students» spring writing scores across grades 2 - 6, using fall writing scores as the covariate, revealed a significant effect for school: F (2, 293) = 5.44, p =.005; and significant school by year - in - study interaction: F (2, 293) = 3.90, p =.02.
An analysis of covariance on students» spring comprehension scores across grades 2 - 6, with fall scores used as the covariate, revealed a significant effect for the school: F (2,336) = 10.18, p <.001; a significant effect for year in study (Year 1 or Year 2): F (1,336) = 4.18, p =.04; and a significant school by year - in - study interaction: F (2,336) = 10.30, p <.001.
Not exact matches
An
analysis of covariance (adjusting for pre-existing literacy differences in September), for example, indicated significant classroom differences
on passage reading in May.
Analysis of covariance was used to determine treatment effects
on students» knowledge
of fractions when the pretest result was used as a covariate.
An
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to study the intervention effects
on the dependent variables (ie, the GHQ items and the two subscales
of the PSOC) by examining differences between the intervention and control group at follow - up, controlling for baseline measures.
Analysis of covariance showed that compared with the TAU group, the IPT - A group showed significantly fewer clinician - reported depression symptoms
on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (P =.04), significantly better functioning
on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (P =.04), significantly better overall social functioning
on the Social Adjustment Scale — Self - Report (P =.01), significantly greater clinical improvement (P =.03), and significantly greater decrease in clinical severity (P =.03)
on the Clinical Global Impressions scale.
Effect
of intervention
on mother — child interaction (CARE Index): mean (SD) scores at 12 months and results
of univariate and multivariate
analysis of covariance adjusting for total number
of risk factors
Effect
of intervention
on maternal functioning: mean scores at baseline, 6 months and 12 months and results
of analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline scores and total number
of risk factors
The obtained results were analyzed using the
analysis of covariance and they showed that spiritual therapy is effective
on increasing students» hope.
To examine changes between groups (intervention vs control)
on baseline and follow - up assessments,
analysis of covariance will be performed for each outcome measure.
In the main
analyses, we first performed a multivariate test
on the association between sample status and all developmental outcomes in GLM multivariate
analyses of covariance.
Results from
analyses of covariance indicated that there were no significant differences (p <.01) between aggression groups
on any executive functioning subdomains.
Analysis of covariance — main & interactive effects
of CSA & relationship satisfaction
on parenting stress.
We hypothesized that multivariate
analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), with youth age controlled, would reveal that youths» scores
on the CPI (Nansel & Weissberg - Benchell, et al., 2008) would be related to youths» diabetes outcomes (glycemic control, treatment adherence, diabetes and general quality
of life, family conflict, youth depressive symptoms, fear
of hypoglycemia, and family sharing
of diabetes responsibilities) as follows: