Not exact matches
For example, the product whose claims, and
actual content are shown above is advertised as «The Finest Whey Protein» We submitted a fresh sample
of this product to a sophisticated laboratory for
analysis.
But when you search for the
actual content of «meta -
analysis» it's here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24613757 With this conclusion «Recent randomized controlled trials document that low - carbohydrate diets not only decrease body weight but also improve cardiovascular risk factors.
You see these two foods have an identical
content of protein and fat, per Guaranteed
Analysis as well as
actual ingredient inclusion.
One thing I would have liked to see in the paper is a quantitative side - by - side comparison
of sea - surface temperatures and upper ocean heat
content; all the paper says is that only «a small amount
of cooling is observed at the surface, although much less than the cooling at depth» though they do report that it is consistent with 2 - yr cooling SST trend — but again, no
actual data
analysis of the SST trend is reported.
The costs
of carbon capture retrofitted to an existing cola plant have been estimated (in an
actual engineering
analysis, not some whimsical guess) at an additional 6 - 8 cents per kwhr to capture 90 %
of the CO2
content.
Instead, they are based on an
analysis of the duties commonly performed in
actual dental assisting practice, which is called a
content validation study.