Sentences with phrase «analysis of the results seems»

According to Dr. Cabeca, the research on these apps has a bias (since they are generally being conducted by the app's developers) but the calculations and analysis of the results seems objective.

Not exact matches

In the introduction to a series that will look back at the events leading up to the election, Silver seems on the defensive somewhat, justifying his analysis of the poll results and pointing out that he predicted Clinton would be weak with the Electoral College and that Trump might prevail.

You may disagree with Krugman's analysis, but it's a little disingenuous to try to denigrate and dismiss Thomas Mulcair's economic ideas when they're based on Nobel prize winning work in economics (the intellectual case, that is; the factual case that this phenomenon is occurring today, in Canada, is purely a question of whether the appreciation of our currency is based on the oil and gas boom and whether a high dollar results in lower exports in other sectors, both of which you seem to have admitted are accurate.)

I does not seem that the doctrine resulted from a careful analysis of what Scripture says, but rather that the doctrine was a result of a need within the early church to have a trump card against those who disagreed with it theologically.

However, the results of more recent phylogenetic analyses, derived from comparisons between sequences of specific genes and of whole genomes, seemed to point to Ctenophora as the first group that parted company with the lineage from which the rest of the animal kingdom (including sponges) evolved.

Now details of a new analysis of their results have leaked, and they seem to reveal that galactic dust is the likely cause of their observations.

Details of a new analysis of last year's BICEP2 results have been accidentally leaked — and seem to show that claiming a gravitational wave discovery was jumping the gun

Results from the analysis confirmed previous findings of some copy number variants already associated with autism, but they also found a host of other genes (SHANK2, SYNGAP1, DLGAP2 and the X chromosome — linked DDX53 - PTCHD1 locus) in which mutations seem to be linked to autism.

Careful analysis of the polarisation results revealed these grains of dust to be comparatively large particles, 0.5 micrometres across, which may seem small, but grains of this size are about 50 times larger than the dust normally found in interstellar space.

Analysis of the results as compared to other studies also gives us some insights into why some people seem to drink and get fat while others seem to drink and get thin!

But to cut to the chase - that quote you took cited a meta - analysis that said in its results at one point that there SEEM to be studies that show diets that include eggs may reduce the risk of Cardiovascular disease but that's kind of a misleading statement because a diet that includes eggs could easily be a healthy diet - but it's not necessarily the eggs making it healthy.

Washington Missing even a few days of school seems to make a difference in whether 8th graders perform at the top of their game, according to a new analysis of results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

This statement seems to be the result of sloppy analysis and is offered without proof.

Juicy Excerpt: The problem that I have with the Shiller analysis is that he seems to be saying that opposite sorts of emotional takes could produce the same result.

At first glance, these two exhibition «aberrations,» resulting from the close collaboration of museum directors Willem Sandberg (Dylaby) and Pontus Hultén (HON), as well as artists Martial Raysse, Robert Rauschenberg, Niki de Saint Phalle, Daniel Spoerri, Jean Tinguely, and Per - Olof Ultvedt, seem to defy serious analysis, let alone contribute to the critical discourse of contemporary exhibition history.

Even seemingly straightforward questions, for example «is X safe» and «is X not safe» seem like (effectively) asking the same question but they may require entirely different analysis and give different results — because of uncertainty in the data, in the results, the logical conclusions / inference required etc. etc..

We seem to get tons of baloney based on the cmip5 ensemble results, and meanwhile I see very few analyses of what goes on.

But of course Lewis wouldn't want to contact the authors if he thought they might say something like «Yeah, we discussed it, and we decided all the sensitivity studies should use similar statistical assumptions» or «On reflection, the choice we made in 2006 seems unwise to us now» or, worse of all, «We don't think they should have changed the analysis, but it doesn't effect our results in any substantial way.»

Nicola Scafetta says «It seems to me that you are arguing that because a clear physical mechanism is still missing and the calculations were done on a short time series than the result of our analysis should be «rejected».

It seems to me that you are arguing that because a clear physical mechanism is still missing and the calculations were done on a short time series than the result of our analysis should be «rejected».

And even if the newly - derived age error values were thousand - year spans, the result of a perturbation analysis would seem to be the simulation of core - top values across the entire span, not the re-dating of the core - top value from one end of the span to the other.

What climate scientists don't seem to understand is that in every analysis situation, they have implicitly specified a statistical model and that the correct interpretation of their statistically derived results depends on an understanding of the details of the model.

«The analysis of papers from diverse fields seems to have distorted the results.

Much, if not most, of the interesting analysis seems to be a result of interventions advanced by the Canadian Bar Association (BC Branch) and the Trial Lawyers Association in support of the applicant, along with that of the Attorney General of BC in support of constitutionality.

More specifically, it seems that relying solely on the results of bifactor analysis to decide whether a psychological scale is unidimensional or multidimensional may be questionable (Joshanloo et al., 2017).

A study of individual cognitive therapy for bipolar disorder showed positive outcomes at 1 - year follow - up, but the benefits were reduced over time, suggesting the need for booster sessions to sustain the gains.19 As with many forms of therapy, CBT has been found to be more successful in reducing relapse in the depressive pole compared with the manic pole.30 A large randomised trial of CBT showed no difference between CBT and treatment as usual, when all participants were included in the analyses.31 However, results of a post-hoc analysis suggested that CBT was effective for participants who reported fewer than 12 prior episodes of illness and were not acutely unwell when therapy began; numbers of episodes of mania rather than depression seemed to predict treatment response.32 Such data can help guide the clinical application of CBT for bipolar patients.