Sentences with phrase «analysis periods starting»

analysis periods starting after 1970 are considered too short to calculate meaningful trend values» and ``..

Given that the analysis period starts in 1988, only three existing Vanguard index funds are applicable: 500 Index (VFINX), Extended Market Index (VEXMX), and Small Cap Index (NAESX).

Not exact matches

These dynamic, life - cycle assessment, valuation or analysis, involves the duration of, period from start to finish.

If you are in the six - month, post-graduation grace period before you have to start paying your federal loans, use the time to get informed and do the necessary analysis to make the right decision about your payment options.

Third, given that formal complaints and legal challenges rose so sharply over this period, it is remarkable how few of the many makeovers started from a careful analysis of what citizens or users repeatedly complained about and how detached public management policy tends to be from the world of complaint - handling and litigation.

While The Times's analysis looked at academy graduates since the program started, the N.Y.U. study examined a group of principals over a period of three years.

If the start of the analysis period is advanced to the beginning of 2001, growth slightly outperformed value:

Note that the chart starts on the last trading day of January 2006 because it was the first full month of the analysis period.

Our analysis provides compelling evidence that future returns will be lower when starting valuations are high, and that returns will be higher in periods where starting valuations are low.

An excellent article from Miles Johnson of the FT looking at some common factors among these investors who have been successful over a long period of time: «Using analysis of US regulatory filings... we are able to look back at the record of almost every large investor from the start of 2001.

So the longest analysis of sea ice starts just at the end of a 30 year period during which Arctic temperarues fell by almost 1 deg C. I take it this doesn't bother you at all?

Because the Reynolds OI.v2 data starts in November 1981, the trend analysis in Animation 3 covers the period of 1982 to 2012.

This week in the journal Nature, Csatho writes a «News and Views» analysis that comments on the latest research in this area: A new study in Nature by Kristian K. Kjeldsen, Niels J. Korsgaard, Kurt H. Kjær and colleagues, who used aerial photographs, remote - sensing observations and geological evidence to estimate the Greenland Ice Sheet's mass loss during three time periods since the start of the 20th century: 1900 - 83, 1983 to 2003 and 2003 - 10.

The study presents a quantitative analysis of historic records for major carbon dioxide emitters worldwide, over a period starting in the 1850s — at the dawn of the industrial revolution — through 2010.

As I understood it this was intended to start a discussion on the significance of the current period of no warming using the «Italian flag» analysis.

One might expect a similar lowering of the bar to apply in the case here which is of course the mirror image of the case I looked at — record breaking low value marking the start of the analysis period being analogous to record breaking high marking the end of the period analysed.

This focus on a cumulative emissions limit for the period from 2000 to 2049 (which is arguably a period of interest for negotiators) has been picked up by the most recent Letter and it is the starting point for the analysis they present, although slightly refined to 2011 to 2050.

Land temperatures themselves are of interest, but as far as I know the only widespread measurements of them have started over the last decade, a period too short to do much trend analysis.

A gap analysis may identify the feasibility of certain strategies and indicate whether the team should conduct energy audits, commission building systems, or start organizing utility data in preparation for the performance period.

That case canvassed, summarized and clarified the law regarding when the «appropriate means» analysis under s. 5 (1)(a)(iv) of the Limitation Act, 2002, can be applied to delay the start of the running of the basic two - year limitation period.

As research across neuroscience, developmental psychology, and economics demonstrates, early social - emotional, physical, and cognitive skills beget later skill acquisition, setting the groundwork for success in school and the workplace.15 However, an analysis of nationally representative data shows that 65 percent of child care centers do not serve children age 1 or younger and that 44 percent do not serve children under age 3 at all.16 Consequently, child care centers only have the capacity to serve 10 percent of all children under age 1 and 25 percent of all children under age 3.17 High - quality child care during this critical period can support children's physical, cognitive, and social - emotional development.18 Attending a high - quality early childhood program such as preschool or Head Start is particularly important for children in poverty or from other disadvantaged backgrounds and can help reduce the large income - based disparities in achievement and development.19

The bill would require the EPA to withdraw their «Waters of the U.S.» proposed rule and start the regulatory process from scratch, making sure there is a comprehensive scientific analysis and robust public review and comment period.