Assuming that climate change and other deep uncertainties can not be eliminated over the short term (and probably even over the longer term), it then summarizes existing decision - making methodologies that are able to deal with climate - related uncertainty, namely cost - benefit
analysis under uncertainty, cost - benefit analysis with real options, robust decision making, and climate informed decision analysis.
Not exact matches
Forecasting building energy demand
under uncertainty using Gaussian process regression: Feature selection, baseline prediction, parametric
analysis and a web - based tool B Yan, X Li, W Shi, X Zhang and A Malkawi 15th Conf.
As I will discuss in Parts II and III of the Decision Making
Under Climate
Uncertainty series (I will get back to that soon I hope), there are a lot of other types of studies and
analyses that climate scientists might be doing to support decision making, that the current focus of the IPCC is arguably distracting from.
This
analysis is based on a set of interviews with decision - makers, in particular World Bank project leaders, and on a literature review on decision - making
under uncertainty.
Looking at other decision making frameworks that are more suitable
under conditions of deep
uncertainty motivates a different type of
analysis and emphasizes assessment of
uncertainty and areas of ignorance.
Results of climate policy
analysis under deep
uncertainty with imprecise probabilities (Kriegler, 2005; Kriegler et al. 2006) are consistent with the previous findings using classical models.
A way forward is the decision analytic framework of robust decision making
under deep
uncertainty, which emphasizes scenario discovery and
uncertainty analysis and identifying a broad range of robust decision strategies.
For detailed ethical
analysis of scientific
uncertainty arguments made in opposition to climate change, see Ethicsandclimate.org index under Scientific Uncertainty and Clim
uncertainty arguments made in opposition to climate change, see Ethicsandclimate.org index
under Scientific
Uncertainty and Clim
Uncertainty and Climate Ethics.
It consists of 11 chapters covering the scope of the
analysis, decision making
under uncertainty, equity issues, intertemporal equity and discounting, applicability of cost and benefit assessments to climate change, social costs of climate change, response options, conceptual issues related to estimating mitigation costs, review of mitigation cost studies, integrated assessment of climate change, and an economic assessment of policy options to address climate change.
Policy
analysis and implementation will be extremely challenging given the nonconvexities in the human - environment system (109) that will be enhanced by tipping elements, as well as the need to handle intergenerational justice and interpersonal equity over long periods and
under conditions of
uncertainty (110).
Weitzman uses that to argue that climate change violates Raiffa's axioms on rational decisions
under uncertainty — that is, cost - benefit
analysis is inapplicable.
This notwithstanding, I wholeheartedly agree with Gavin that these kinds of probabilistic projections aren't appropriate for risk
analysis and decision making
under uncertainty and won't be for a long time.
For more information about real options
analysis, see Tom Copeland and Vladimir Antikarov, Real Options, Revised Edition: A Practitioner's Guide, Texere, 2003; and Glenn S. Daily and Laurence J. Kotlikoff, «Decision Making
Under Conditions of
Uncertainty: A (Second) Wakeup Call for the Financial Planning Profession,» 2006 (www.glenndaily.com/documents/wakeupcall.pdf)