Not exact matches
Secondly as stated further up the thread, the
biblical account of creation was to show the authority of God to an
ancient people.
In
ancient biblical cultures, the term was often used in connection with a
person being bought from the slave markets and then being given their freedom.
It juxtaposes
ancient Biblical form and contemporary reality, challenging the reader to see and seek God in all
persons.
It is therefore extremely difficult for the average
person so to translate the
biblical view into his own idiom that the
ancient experiences become relevant to him.
Hermann Gunkel, in a sense the unique father of us all in modern
biblical scholarship, despite his insistence on saga's supervision of the Elijah narratives as we receive them, nevertheless affirms on the one hand Elijah's kinship with the greatest of all ministers of
ancient Israel, Moses, in their mutual contention with their own
people; and, on the other hand, Elijah's legitimate and immediate relationship to the great prophets who follow him and who, essentially, continue the work he began.
Mike, if I were a
biblical literalist I would have a problem with the Book of Job; but it is a very
ancient text and speaks to a
people for whom Satan was often suspected of being more powerful than God.
This is, of course, the issue addressed on a more personal level in Rabbi Harold Kushner's highly popular When Bad Things Happen to Good
People, reassessing a conflict at least as
ancient as the
biblical Book of Job.
«No responsible doctrine of inspiration can deny that the
biblical authors were thoroughly encultured,
ancient people, who spoke as
ancient people.
«There were a lot of
people in the
ancient world who thought that lying could serve a greater good,» says Ehrman, an expert on
ancient biblical manuscripts.