To place the horse evolutionary history in a chronological context, we estimated the divergence time between the ancestors of
the ancient horse population and ancestors of the modern horse populations, as well as the divergence time between the ancestors of Przewalski's horses and domesticated horses.
In the second model (Fig. 3C), population structure was present among Late Pleistocene horses in Eurasia, with
the ancient horse population originating, albeit earlier, from a similar background to the ancestral population of domesticated horses, whereas Przewalski's horses derived from a different background.
The D - statistic was used to examine the presence of gene flow between
the ancient horse population, the Przewalski's horse population, and the population of domesticated horses.
ANC,
ancient horse population; DOM, population of domesticated horses; PRZ, Przewalski's horse population.
Not exact matches
Their work on
ancient DNA from Viking Age
horses is more promising: Kool and Boessenkool have collected about 100 samples, in different states of preservation, from which they hope to build a detailed picture of how equine
populations moved and changed.
This suggests that restocking from a wild
population descendant from the
ancient horses occurred during the domestication processes that ultimately led to the modern domesticated
horses.
Patterns of
population splits and migration events were analyzed using TreeMix (82) and the intersection of SNPs passing quality filters for the
ancient specimens, all modern
horses, and the domestic donkey (when included).
(B)
Population model assuming admixture between the descending
population of
ancient horses and the
population that gave rise to domesticated
horses [split times in kya (Kyr)-RSB-.
We therefore assumed that this topology best reflected the relationships between
ancient and living
horse populations.
These
ancient genomes reveal predomestic
population structure and a significant fraction of genetic variation shared with the domestic breeds but absent from Przewalski's
horses.
In the first model (Fig. 3B), the
population including our
ancient horses and their descendants first separated from common ancestors of domesticated
horses and Przewalski's
horses, and later admixed with the
population ancestral to domesticated
horses after it diverged from the Przewalski's
horse population.
When considering the split between the
ancient population and the ancestors of modern domesticated
horses, where we identified significant amounts of gene flow (below), this method underestimates the
population split time, and therefore provides a lower boundary for the
population split time estimate (SI Appendix, section 2.8.2).
The presence of these SNPs in the
ancient horses implies that selection for these traits did not occur on de novo mutations but on existing variation, which was either contributed to the domesticated stock by the
ancient population through admixture or was cosegregating in both the ancestors of the
ancient horses and the ancestors of the domesticated
horses after their split.