Medical description of the brachial plexus injury goes back to
ancient times with the modern description dating to the latter part of the 19
But in
ancient times with an oral tradition there would have been no definitive version, the stories were fluid and in constant flux.
As an herbalist, I combine the knowledge of what people did in
ancient times with the modern information we have.
It is very nice to have and in
the ancient times with many unanswerable questions it was a comfort.
Most of them are perfectly aware that the stories of the Bible was written in historically
ancient time with very different customs than our own that are not applicable to today's society.
Not exact matches
After all, when Strange spoke
with the
Ancient One before her death in his solo film, she slowed
time down to micro-seconds to hold a fairly lengthy conversation
with him.
That
time period in
ancient China, by the way, corresponds
with what is called the Spring and Autumn Period (about 771 to 476 B.C.), which tradition associates
with the Chinese teacher and philosopher Confucius, one of the first to espouse the principle:
In
ancient times, people who were dissatisfied
with their lives dreamed of finding magic lamps, buried treasure, or streets paved
with gold.
You just have to take the
time to think about it long enough to see that these
ancient written texts were written by humans
with less knowledge about science than we have now.
What is really fascinating is the theory that the Hebrew and Muslim deity figure derive from a war god in an
ancient Semitic pantheon whose association
with the other gods was lost in the confusion that
time and oral tradition bring.
Find something better to do
with your
time than to debate
ancient christian mythology.
Satan is the ORIGINAL anti Jesus,
with a DIECT link to God himself (Some consider him to be a manifestation of those who resisted the Jews in
ancient times) Who came about well before Christ.
This is a distorted translation... lots of good information comes from
ancient books... it's just that the bible is fictional and any useful information can be found anywhere else since the bible plagiarized any real useful information that's in it... like do unto others as you wish them to do to you... is just
ancient common sense and has nothing to do
with what any fantasy gods might have said... the bible is a waste of
time for the stupids.
All the god has to do is show itself, just like the stories say it did so often in
ancient times, and all would be right
with the world and the god would have a 100 % following.
If we do not quite, as Machiavelli recommended, put on our «royal and curial robes» to converse
with the
ancients, we must nevertheless give these books our undivided attention and
time.
The remarks Badian made some
time ago in connection
with the study of the deification of Alexander the Great are apposite in this respect: «Modern Jews and Christians, or modern rationalists, from their different points of view, have always found it difficult to believe that the
ancient Greeks took their religion seriously since it seems so patently absurd.»
The emergence and blossoming of understanding, love, and intelligence has nothing to do
with any tradition, no matter how
ancient or impressive — it has nothing to do
with time.
The poet dares to echo
ancient Lamech
with his unrestrained thirst for vengeance, 70
times seven.
Together
with the opening line of the Letter to the Hebrews («In
ancient times God spoke to man through prophets and in varied ways, but now he speaks through Christ, His Son...»), as well as many other biblical texts, this passage reveals to us a startling truth.
That the worship of Yahweh was at
times associated
with this
ancient abomination is clear from the indignant protests of the prophets.
He reiterated that he had written a piece in The
Times four years ago, saying: «the world must wake up urgently to the plight of the
ancient churches throughout the region who are faced
with the threat of mass murder and mass displacement».
Yet the basic social and cultural patterns that today condemn men and women to death, in accordance
with the wishes of 65 per cent of the American public, remain in some ways remarkably unchanged from
ancient times.
I think (western) Christians struggle
with simple hospitality — something that in
ancient times was simply taken for granted — it was deep in that culture.
Doubtless this pleasant young man soon found someone unacquainted
with Joseph Smith's Testimony, that ubiquitous missionary tract which contains the official account of the prophet's visions and his discovery of the
ancient record chronicling the lives and
times, vicissitudes and final destruction of a Hebraic people whose patriarch immigrated to America
with his family in 600 BC.
This lack of attention to women having sex
with each other is understandable because in that
ancient time it was thought that only men initiated new life, only men carried the seed for new life.
Because we have had these experiences and live
with these developments and because these experiences and developments can not be erased or quarantined from our perceptual and analytical processes, we are not capable of developing an adequate or reasonable comprehension of
ancient times, cultures and people.
''... Atheists who also wrote about how there was a list of all the egyptian rulers from the
ancient times and no mention of Jacob who the Bible said co ruled
with Pharaoh during the
time of great famine.
So we fight back
with logic and ask them to prove their beliefs
with something substantiative that can be tested without a doubt and not some
ancient texts written by MEN (no matter how many
times they claim it's «HIS» word).
@PUZZLED — well see my issus lies
with the fact of how women were treated in
ancient times — they were property and so allowing them to go thru all the emotionals and physicals of carrying and then giving birth only to toss it off a cliff isn't what i'd call good parenting — having an abortion for many people who should NEVER have kids is (in my opinion) good parenting!
In
ancient culture the peak
times of the agricultural and solar years, such as spring planting, fall harvest, winter solstice, and spring equinox, threatened to seduce the people of God to the worship of fertility and sun gods and goddesses connected
with these peak
times.
The implications of Israel's understanding of YHWH, as expressed in the first two commandments, are completely at variance
with the way
ancient man thought of the gods, and explain the iconoclasm which has been prominent from
time to
time in both Judaism and Christianity.
The grounds on which church authorities resisted the advancing claims of the sciences were in the first place simply that they were at variance
with the accepted teachings handed down from
ancient times.
Part of the answer is that these
ancient events are moments in a living process which includes also the existence of the church at the present day; and another part is that, as Christians believe, in these events of
ancient time God was at work among men, and it is from his action in history rather than from abstract arguments that we learn what God is like, and what are the principles on which he deals
with men, now as always.
One of the
ancient prophets — the same, indeed, who spoke of the «king coming in gentleness» — also drew a picture of a good
time to come when men of all nations will go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts; and on that day the prophet adds, «there shall no more be a trader in the house of the Lord of hosts,» 11 Jesus was offering symbolically a fulfillment of that prophecy, in line
with his basic affirmation that the kingdom of God is here.
And we were all restored to joy, again and again, because I couldn't stop laughing, every
time I gave birth, when it was over, I laughed and laughed in relief and wonder, like an
ancient Sarah joining
with God in laughter here at promises fulfilled.
But if enough
time is not available, a basic course could be worked out on a typological basis in which one primitive cult, one of the
ancient religions of the Near East and the two great competitors of Christianity — Islam and Buddhism — could be dealt
with.
Historicism forms a barrier between us and the understanding of
time that defined the Judaic and the Christian encounter
with God through the Scriptures of
ancient Israel.
What we have here is a «ladder of being» not uncommon in
ancient times: there is God at the top,
with human beings below God but above all other animals, and there are also beings above humans.
Like many points of
time in
ancient history, the dates in Jesus» life are not ascertainable
with absolute exactitude.
Theoretically a Purana is supposed to deal
with five subjects: (1) the creation; (2) re-creation, the periodical destruction and renewal of the worlds; (3) the genealogy of the gods and the
ancient Rishis; (4) the great
time periods, each of which has a primal ancestor or Manu; and (5) the history of the early dynasties which trace their origin to the sun or the moon.
Not only its aesthetic value, which is apparent in the power of its expression, in the depth of its sensitivity, and in its monumental structure; but also its content — the bold and colossal struggle
with the
ancient, and at the same
time always new, human problem of the meaning of suffering — all this puts the work, in its universal significance, in a class
with Dante's Divine Comedy and Goethe's Faust.8
What is needed at the present
time, then, is a theology of sin that builds upon the work of the persons cited here, but that can develop a stronger connection between social structures and individuals, and
with the
ancient insights concerning original sin.
For example, at one point he quotes the distinguished historian of
ancient science G. E. R. Lloyd, who said of Greek science: «Much as the Egyptians and Babylonians contributed to the content of these studies, the investigations only acquire self «conscious methodologies for the first
time with the Greeks.»
I then took that tiny folded paper, which contained more pain and names than I care to share, and wedged it deep into a crack in the
ancient red rock where it will disintegrate in
time — along
with my pain.
There are a variety of ways in which this is so, but, at the same
time, it's clear that certain aspects of pagan familial virtue are not exactly incompatible
with the Biblical sacred order that can check or overcome their excesses and pathologies — just as the Biblical order imposes powerful interdicts, not to be confused
with taboos, against the kind of violent desires that, to the morbid fascination of the
ancient Greeks, deconstructed and destroyed the identities of family - bound individuals.
So must the student of comparative religion when he compares modern religious movements
with those of
ancient times.
Instead of the Sermon's provision for cases at law, for the exercise of charity, for civic virtue, presupposing if at the same
time reinterpreting the requirements of the
ancient national code; instead of the Old Testament Law
with its provisions for the inheritance of property, for various kinds of civic and social duties, albeit of a primitive order, which the Sermon presupposes, (Matt.
Justin points out that «rape had been used at
times a s a symbol of domination,
with armies raping the (male) leader of a conquered enemy... Clearly, in some cultures and contexts — whether in
ancient times or in modern - day prisons — male - male rape had been used or threatened as a method of violent humiliation and domination.»
In
ancient times, the priest lifted his hands upwards while saying «sursum corda» and the people responded likewise, also raising their hands aloft
with their «We have lifted them up to the Lord.»
(I do not share the suspicion, which goes back to
ancient times, that Mark did not originally end
with 16:8.