Sentences with phrase «ancillary relief hearings»

Under the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (SI 1991/1247), r 2.66 (2) ancillary relief hearings are in chambers.

In B v B [2007] EWHC 2472 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 404 (Oct) a house was sold by H, and to his advantage, for appreciably more than its valuation at the time of the ancillary relief hearing.

Apart from maintenance pending suit and financial provision for children, the absence of a decree nisi will kill off the idea of a contested ancillary relief hearing for the time being unless special circumstances, the parties» concurrence and judicial approval all coincide.

However, King J explained: I do not take Smith v Smith to be saying that the court must always hear a case as a full blown ancillary relief hearing where there is an alleged agreement, but rather as a trenchant reminder that an agreement forms part of all the circumstances of a case and that, even if such an agreement be found to be of magnetic importance, the court should only ever consider such an agreement against the backdrop of all the s 25 factors.

The matter was transferred to the High Court with the wife seeking to persuade the court to proceed with directions for the ancillary relief hearing, while the husband sought an order that the ancillary relief proceedings be stayed and that there be a hearing of his Notice to Show Cause.

Not exact matches

A hearing has been arranged for 12 May 2008 by when he hopes to be able to pronounce a decree under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1972 s 1 (2)(d)-- consent still being available — and no doubt to formally make his order for ancillary relief.

NHS and Government banned >> Internet bankruptcy >> Telephone hearings healthy >> Court approval on ancillary relief >> Depression for property market and couples >>

After a one - half day open court hearing on damages, Lincoln J has just awarded the wife # 9,605 damages and interest and ordered the husband to pay the wife's costs... The court went into chambers on ancillary relief for three days and judgment there is expected at the end of this month.

The original ancillary relief proceedings were heard in June 2001 following the parties» 11 - year marriage.

Even though the question of the hearing ancillary relief (and all other family cases) in public has not arisen in this case (and indeed was expressly not supported by Mr Dean in his submissions) I would hope that nonetheless the Court of Appeal will resolve the unhappy divergence of judicial approach to which I referred at paras 13 — 16 of DL v SL.»