Factors affecting that difference apart from those already mentioned are: the different
angular distance from a target within which EBs become diluted and cause a false positive; here Brown uses a radius of 20 whereas for CoRoT, diluted EBs found by the photometric follow - up infer a radius of about 17 (Deeg et al. 2009).
Not exact matches
A planet's
angular momentum equals the mass of an object multiplied by its
distance from the Sun, and corresponds with the force that the planet exerts on the overall system's spin.
By comparing the
angular differences in those paths to the geographic
distances between the observers, astronomers could calculate Earth's
distance from Venus.
Despite their hunches, researchers have been unable to prove that the visual system measures
distance with angles because they couldn't separate
angular declination
from other visual cues.
The spin of such cosmic objects is described by a conserved quantity called
angular momentum, which accounts for both the speed of the rotating mass and its
distance from the spin axis.
This list is every galaxy with an
angular size greater than 1.8 arcminutes within 7.5 degrees of the centre of the cluster which at a
distance of 52 million light years corresponds to every galaxy with a diameter greater than 30 thousand light years within 7 million light years
from the centre.
The linear
distance from the galaxy center = -LSB-(2p × (
distance to the galaxy) × (
angular distance in degrees)-RSB- / 360 °.
The new technique is similar to that used by land surveyors on earth, who measure both the physical and
angular — or «apparent» — size of a distant object, to calculate its
distance from Earth.
The
angular distance of the piece of the disk
from the center is measured, but to use the enclosed mass formula, the piece of the disk's actual linear
distance from the center must be found.
Remember way back in the planetary science chapter that the linear
distance can be found
from the
angular distance if you know the
distance to the object?
A point source is detected at an
angular distance of 3.5»
from the central star.
If the
angular distance of a star
from the radiant is λ and if the velocity of the cluster as a whole with respect to the Sun is V, then the radial velocity of the star, Vr, is Vr = V cos λ.
There is a significant loss of rotational energy due to tidal drag transferring
angular momentum
from Earth's axial rotation to the Earth - Moon system (Earth slows, EM
distance increases).
I accept that there are complex weather systems bubbling away at any given point over the earth's surface but, on a planetary scale as the earth rotates on its axis, I suggest these will essentially average out, at similar
angular distances as
from the sub-solar point, at decadal and centennial timeframes.
Another thing which I would like clarified is the planet's
distance from the Sun, its
Angular Momentum and its consequent effect on the Sun.
The chord can be described using the
angular position of the endpoints, or the coordinates of the midpoint, or the orientation and
distance from the centre.
A planet's
angular momentum equals the mass of an object multiplied by its
distance from the sun, and corresponds with the force that the planet exerts on the overall system's spin.