Its authors suggest a series of questions that researchers should use in analyzing the evidence that abnormal
animal behavior predicts earthquakes.
Its authors suggest a series of questions that researchers should use in analyzing the evidence that abnormal
animal behavior predicts earthquakes.
Not exact matches
I hold that it is absurd in principle to think of
predicting details of
animal behavior (not to mention
animal feelings).
They seem to realize, says Pruetz, that fire has a
behavior — just like another forest
animal — and that its movements can be
predicted.
Game theory, the branch of mathematics best known for exploring economics, has for the first time successfully
predicted animal behavior in nature.
This neat
behavior could mean that the birds possess so - called Theory of Mind — an ability to
predict the mental state of another
animal (or in other words, to theorize that this other
animal has a mind), which is one of the defining traits of humans and closely related primates.
In fact, the Association of Pet Dog Trainers does not allow its members to offer guarantees, since
animal behavior can never be fully
predicted or controlled.
Researchers hope that by knowing exactly what certain species of
animals are up to, they can understand them much more thoroughly - and possibly even
predict behavior and reduce human -
animal conflicts, revolutionizing the way we interact with and manage wildlife.
Jason Goldman published a great writeup on Thoughtful
Animal about Tronick's 1975 experiment, the impact it had in understanding child development, and how it's being used, including to
predict child
behavior: