Sentences with phrase «animal book in»
By the early 1960s, TFH Publications was the largest publisher of pet and animal books in the world, and its magazine was a must - read among serious aquarium hobbyists.
http://www.petbusiness.com/ Not exact matches
In the 2003 book «Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can't Learn about Sex from Animals,» the biologist Marlene Zuk points out that social groups of hens do have «pecking orders.»
Or as Paul Shapiro, vice president of policy at the Humane Society of the United States and author of the forthcoming book Clean Meat, sums up: «It's possible that folks in this field might end up doing more good for animals than what I've done with my life.»
In his famous book, «The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,» Keynes writes, «a large proportion of our positive activities depend on spontaneous optimism rather than on a mathematical expectation, whether moral or hedonistic or economic... if the animal spirits are dimmed and the spontaneous optimism falters, leaving us to depend on nothing but a mathematical expectation, enterprise will fade and die; though fears of loss may have a basis no more reasonable than hopes of profit had before.»
At six, her stance is Like a professional's — she waits her cue Intensely and with no expression, The youngest in the troupe of girls Costumed alike in skirts that flare like bells Embroidered with designs — Abstracted tangled animals and geometric vines — Drawn from the Book of Kells, Hair....
It takes education, knowledge to understand, and one has to have knowledge in hindu Juda ism, filthy secular ism, self center ism to understand book of hindu mithra ism, racist savior ism, called bible, of hindu dark ages, best of secular, self centered are donkeys, one of hindu secular chosen animal, secular.
Which leads me to the question of WHY DO YOU FOLLOW a being known ONLY by a book called the bible in which he drowns EVERY animal and CHILD on the planet for no reason.
Animal - rights activists are up in arms about a recent statement by Peter Singer ¯ a bioethics professor at Princeton's Center for Human Values who was, once upon a time, beloved by those activists for his 1975 book Animal Liberation.
@David The Book of Mormon mentions several animals, plants, and technologies that are not substantiated by the archaeological record between 3100 BC to 400 AD in America, including the following: ass, cow, horses, ox, domesticated sheep, swine, goats, elephants, wheat, barley, silk, steel, swords, scimitars, chariots and other elements.
As I have argued in my book Moral, Believing Animals, all human beings are believers, not knowers who know with certitude.
Singer was more responsible than anyone else for making the term «speciesism» known, beginning in 1975 with his highly influential book Animal Liberation and continuing with his widely professed proposal that so - called human non-persons can be killed (infanticide or non-voluntary euthanasia) because of their «lower» moral status.
A child delights in seeing animals, meeting new people, reading familiar books over and over, and a million other little pleasures that we adults take for granted.
Presenting material we've found elsewhere as our own with no credit to the source, in a for - sale book, is an animal of quite a different color.
On the contrary, every time a biblical author sketches the eschaton, humans are on earth using various kinds of cultural goods, cooking meals, living in houses, walking on roads, raising banners, blowing trumpets, using domesticated animals, sitting on chairs, reading books, and so on.
(II Samuel xv - xviii) Again, if we isolate those parts which in our proposed classification would have to be labelled «Religion», some of them do not appear to have any particular relevance to the religious life as it is understood by civilized men in our contemporary world; such as the detailed regulations for the ritual slaughter of animals in the Book of Leviticus.
The first look at sustainability, and how we're supposed to care about the Earth, is in our two favorite books of the Bible: Leviticus and Numbers, where it talks about crop rotation and animal husbandry.
by the way, in either the book of Jasher or Jubilees, it says that animals spoke the same dialect and could communicate with humans.
Sadly, when this approach is applied to the Book of Genesis, the profound theological insights which are communicated through its narratives can be lost, e.g. the stars, animals, plants, etc. in fact all of nature, is part of creation, that is, it is created by God, it is not a god (contrary to the pagan understanding of the natural world).
Her little book Animals and Why They Matter makes a persuasive case for distinctions among values, thus avoiding problems in extreme positions.
Decades later, in his latest book, «The Divine Life of Animals,» he briefly describes how he adopted Penny during a family vacation to Mexico.
Barbara Kingsolver wrote in her book, Animal Dreams, «The very least you can do in your life is figure out what you hope for.
«Talking snakes», 500 yr old men and one of them called «Noah» with an ark who somehow magically saved all the animals (LOL), «Adam and Eve» in the «Garden of Eden» even though all the proof shows that the human species began in S. East Africa., a planet and universe that was supposedly created in 6 days 6 thousand years ago... thanks, but I have all the proof I need to NOT believe in your twisted book of fairy tales.
As a minor illustration: I have written two books (The Philosophy and Psychology of Sensation, 1934 and Born to Sing, 1973) which, with all their faults (especially apparent to me in the earlier work), contain pointers, I believe, by which competent investigators might be helped to deal with some problems in psycho - physiology and in the study of animal behavior.
Indeed, her book is representative of all that is good and bad about the current explosion of theological interest in animals.
They grow up believing in an Eternal Hell of fire and brimstone, talking snakes, the Doctrine of Original Sin, animals in an ark, a Young Earth paradigm, the notion that people lived to be hundreds of years old a few thousand years ago, patriarchs that practiced child sacrifice and committed genocides, books that are supposed words of gawd that contradict real world observations, deities that kill their own children (human manifestations of their own selves) for the sake of sins that they never committed, the symbolic cannibalism and vampirism of a deity... I could go on for days.
«The body,» he continues, «would thus be, not the cause of our thinking, but merely a condition restrictive thereof, and, although essential to our sensuous and animal consciousness, it may be regarded as an impeder of our pure spiritual life.8 And in a recent book of great suggestiveness and power, less well - known as yet than it deserves, — I mean» Riddles of the Sphinx,» by Mr. F. C. S. Schiller of Oxford, late of Cornell University, — the transmission - theory is defended at some length.9
These and other instances of the oppression of animals have been documented in great detail in numerous books and treatises, especially in the last decade (see Singer, 1985).
Humans are still not evolved much beyond animals — we believe a book that was, literally, cobbled together from several questionable sources all in the name of bringing as many religions together as possible over 2000 years ago.
Rene Descartes, «Animals Are Machines,» in Animals and Christianity: A Book of Readings, ed.
God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...
God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...
Professor Celia Deane - Drummond's book, The Wisdom of the Liminal: Evolution and Other Animals in Human Becoming, is an ambitious attempt to counter this trend by bringing questions about animals — as evolved and evolving — into a sustained dialogue with theological anthropology, seeking thereby to reshape the theological vision of the human Animals in Human Becoming, is an ambitious attempt to counter this trend by bringing questions about animals — as evolved and evolving — into a sustained dialogue with theological anthropology, seeking thereby to reshape the theological vision of the human animals — as evolved and evolving — into a sustained dialogue with theological anthropology, seeking thereby to reshape the theological vision of the human person.
I myself discussed this in 1951 in the first chapter of my book, Learning and Instinct in Animals, and in a number of writings since.
Because nonhuman animals are not, by hypothesis, capable of developing such virtues, it is hard to see why a creator who is both omnipotent and benevolent would make them so susceptible to pain (insofar as warning devices are needed, omnipotence could have fashioned nonpainful ones, as pointed out in the book Catch 22).
There is a rather profound section in the «Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy» set of books, where the main character Arthur, upon an awakening because of a human love, feels like he has been a trapped animal, that finds its cage open, with the fields stretching out, beautiful, before him.
The most passionate argument in the book, in a chapter on declining Jewish population, pleads that, after the Holocaust, Jews are an endangered species, deserving protection and enhancement for the sake of diversity, like the bald eagle: «You have friends who work to rescue endangered animal and plant species, so you know why this matters.»
The speculation that it was in a «section on preaching to the «half breeds» / Samaritans» might be some handy way someone sections off that section of the book, but to assume every incident within a certain part of scripture is there like a Science book identifying the phylum and genus of an animal, that is, that everything mentioned under the Raccoon Family is in the Raccoon Family (the ring - tail cat, kinkajou, coatimundi... three other members of the raccoon family), is an assumption that does not seem to apply to the Bible and how it is written... it is more human, and living, and not sterile, everything in its tight little unmovable section, etc..
We had mammal and bird identification books, and I kept a list of what we saw — in all, 16 species of animals and 23 species of birds.
In: Book of Abstracts of the 67th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, Wageningen Academic Publisher, The Netherlands, Book of abstracts, no. 22, p. 307.
I'd love to win the book because it seems there are many highly inventive ways of adding beans to one's diet, and I'm always looking for options to replace animal - proteins in my diet.
Eating nose - to - tail is also one of the best ways to respect the entire animal, making this book great for those seeking sustainability in their diet and lifestyle.
In addition, the winning blogger will choose which Animal Welfare Charity all the proceeds from the book will go to.
She holds a Doctorate in poetry from the University of Sydney and has had 9 books published, most of which focus on animal protection issues.
Project Animal Farm Sonia Faruqi takes her readers on a «journey into the secret world of farming to tell the truths about our food» in her debut book, Project Animal Farm.
About the conversation with TC Campbell, in his China Study audio version, he mentions that he doesn't eat animal based protein, but this only happen a few years previous to the publication of the book.
In the book Park accused the Bruins of everything from padding statistics to taking sneak punches and called them «a bunch of bloodthirsty animals.»
The actor is set to star in a film directed by veteran stunt coordinator Nick Powell (The Bourne Identity, X-Men: The Last Stand, Cinderella Man), which centers on Frank Walsh (Cage), a big game hunter for zoos who has booked passage on a Greek shipping freighter with a fresh haul of exotic and deadly animals from the Amazon, including a rare white jaguar.
I'm so happy to have it off the shelves and on his bed, or in «his world» on the top bunk - covered in stuffed animals, tracking books, field journals, a flashlight, and likely a few poky pencils too.
Of course, Papa was a big hunter and all - around macho man, something Esquire writer Marty Beckerman talks about in his new book, The Hemming Way: How to Unlease the Booze - Inhaling, Animal - Slaughtering, War - Glorifying, Hairy - Chested, Retro - Sexual Legend Within... Just Like Papa!
In the beginning, babies need their parents for everything but eventually they learn object permanence and know you are nearby, they learn to sing to themselves, they grow attached to special plush animals, or can» read» books to help themselves fall asleep... all techniques learned from their parents.