Sentences with phrase «animal facts in»

Caldecott Honor — winner Jenkins is well - known for his paper collage artwork and for deploying fascinating animal facts in easily digestible picture book formats.

Watch some weird and wacky videos and print out fun and quirky animal facts in the National Geographic Kids Almanac 2012.

Not exact matches

While the two projects look similar, they are, in fact, completely different animals, presenting vastly different political and economic outcomes, and opportunities that should have been considered before they were both approved willy - nilly.

In fact, you can give these donations as gifts (many of them come with an «experience» such as a safari when you donate to a local exotic animal zoo) and get good karma points, a tax write - off, and a genuine thank you to boot.

«I always felt a little guilty about the fact that I don't eat any animals processed in slaughterhouses, but I feed them to my animals,» he says.

In fact, in animals, play helps the frontal lobe of the brain maturIn fact, in animals, play helps the frontal lobe of the brain maturin animals, play helps the frontal lobe of the brain mature.

When police arrived on the scene with the animal containment unit, they realized about halfway through cramming the creature into a cage to be brought to the NBSPCA that the «snake» was in fact Stephen Harper.»

As GFI has pointed out, however, many animal charities are already working to shift public attitudes; some have been working in that area for decades.94 In fact, advancing technology elegantly complements all the work that is being done to shift attitudein that area for decades.94 In fact, advancing technology elegantly complements all the work that is being done to shift attitudeIn fact, advancing technology elegantly complements all the work that is being done to shift attitudes.

The fact is that the conservatives who believe this nonsense, or even the moronic position taken by the personhood amendments, put them squarely in the same camp with other crazies like many PETA supporters who want to criminalize the killing and eating of any animals.

As a matter of fact, I would like to thank Sister Catherine for rolling her eyes to the ceiling when we asked in 4th grade about how god made all the animals in one day and there were dinosaurs that were millions of years old while we studied fossils.

As for Justice Stevens himself, it is an arresting fact that in the animal sacrifice case he joined the opinion announcing the constitutional requirement that public officials disassociate themselves from antireligious measures.

the fact he graduated from texas A&M with a degree in animal science with a 2.5 GPA should say something.

In fact, it's a strength to deny one's baser, animal instincts and to act according to one's principles, even when those priciples are difficult.

But if we choose to believe something and present that belief as scientific and factual when in fact it is not, we are dealing with another type of animal here.

I've been snowbound since Sunday evening, stuck at home with kids who resent the fact that there are no snow days in homeschool, a wife who wonders why I don't have a job in south Florida (but only on cold winter days), and two animals (a neurotic dog who keeps asking to go out and then to come in, and a kitten that is constantly hunting my various appendages).

In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left - hand protein molecule as found in all animalIn fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left - hand protein molecule as found in all animalin all animals.

The fact remains... in order for the food to be grown, animals must die.

The pamphlet «What makes Man Unique» comments that nature, from its own internal laws, should not produce an animal which is beyond environmental control, as it in fact does in the case of man.

That's not quite right and in fact you miss one of the biggest differences in the human brain compared to other animals.

That fact has nothing to do with any valuation of humans we might care to make in relation to other animals.

i do nt understand what religous people really believe is waiting for them in an afterlife when we know for a fact that the body doesn't go there and the fact that animals apparently cant go to heaven because they have no soul is well thats just good old conceited man made rubbish that is everywhere in the bible and before i get attacked i was raised religious and got very religious for a few years till i actually thought about it and applyed logic to it after that the whole concept of religion made me feel sick

But when you also add to that the fact that Cain's offering was not acceptable, being of vegetables from tilling the ground, while Abel's was acceptable (being an animal sacrifice), then there is very strong evidence to support what God considered «right» back then in relation to the offering.

But in fact those who work to reduce animal suffering rarely have such matters in mind.

It's never been proven and therefore not a fact that humans are animals in spite of your group think.

The fact that some animals can not reason or talk in language we understand should be as irrelevant to us as is the fact that some humans in relation to whom we have ethical obligations — severely retarded children, for example — can neither reason nor talk.

In fact, according to the Bible, the reason that God accepts human nature is because we are the only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrificeIn fact, according to the Bible, the reason that God accepts human nature is because we are the only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrificein the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrifices.

As for the free range analogy, it is a known fact that animals under the care of a kind master live much longer and are much healthier than those in the wild.

The difference id that evolution is based on facts (fosils, prior extinct animals, the evolution before our very eyes with microbes, etc) and creationism has absolutely no evidence whatsover and is based on fantasy and magical thinking and has no place in science classes.

In fact we aren't the only animals to demonstrate these moral qualities.

Against all soft - centered optimism, Updike salutes the doctrine of original sin for acknowledging this obdurate fact: «The world is fallen, and in a fallen world animals, men, and nations make space for themselves through a willingness to fight.

In fact if you actually read the olkd testiment and specifially Genesis, you will find that sciences account of how the earth was formed and how the animals evolved follows the sequence exactly.

Different kinds of animals, in fact, don't like to dine together.

As a Christian, I absolutely believe God began the human race in the Garden of Eden... as a discerning intelligent human being, I can not deny the facts found in carbon dating studies of ancient fossil remains... if God can creat man, he can also allow for investigation and confirmation of planet plant and animal life, the upheaval of mountains, and history of the sea.

Moreover, «fact» doesn't mean «absolute certainty»; there ain't no such animal in an exciting and complex world.

For example, Westerners visiting the hospital were displeased at Schweitzer's insistence that the animals be allowed to go wherever they wanted without harm — animals were in fact often cared for as tenderly and thoroughly as any white settler.

They note that while some ecologists are focusing attention on the maintenance of wilderness, we have in fact turned our farms into factories, where meat is produced with no regard whatever for the suffering of the animals involved.

and how Allah reveals not withstanding the facts that the chapters in quran are named as animals, things, ETC..

Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be seen all round us — in the bodies of all higher forms of life, in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety of tasks they have to perform; in animal associations, where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil; in human societies, where the growth of specialization becomes ever more intense; and in the field of personal relationships, where friends and lovers can only discover all that is in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.

Scripture understands this — in fact, it is a profound theme of scripture from the beginning, when God dresses Adam and Eve in animal skins before they leave Eden, to the end, when we're all going to be wearing white robes in the new Jerusalem.

That it has had an effect on our little animal brains is apparent in the fact that there are many believers who have heeded the commandment to love one another whether it came from Krishna, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, Baha'u «llah, or any other Messenger.

The founder of modern philosophy, Rene Descartes, was quite explicit in holding that animals were in fact only objects with no feelings.

But in view of the fact that God entered into a covenantal relationship with animals as well as with men, this concern seems misplaced.

In fact, some would say that there is no human value or goodness unless this value pattern is exemplified in our activities; that the capacity to realize this structure of relations in our lives (to a greater extent than can the other animals) is what largely constitutes our humanitIn fact, some would say that there is no human value or goodness unless this value pattern is exemplified in our activities; that the capacity to realize this structure of relations in our lives (to a greater extent than can the other animals) is what largely constitutes our humanitin our activities; that the capacity to realize this structure of relations in our lives (to a greater extent than can the other animals) is what largely constitutes our humanitin our lives (to a greater extent than can the other animals) is what largely constitutes our humanity.

In fact it is apparent that some other animals share a certain degree of self - consciousness, most notably the great apes.

Morals do not come from belief and in fact we can find a great many immoral issues with belief - the bible is a proponent of such immoral issues - rape; human sacrifice; animal sacrifice; child abuse; mass murder; idolatry (the 1st 4 commandments are exactly that); bigotry (the non-stop judging of gays based solely on what the bible says); oppression of women; incest.

From the fact of infant inferiority, however, we should not be driven in a Michael Tooley - like direction14 toward the moral permissibility of infanticide, but rather toward the protection of the lives of animals.

But in fact we are, among other things, animals — emergent parts of the natural order.

Whether and how far these reflections concerning a positive relation between spirit and matter may be significant when it is a question of asking in philosophical and theological terms whether an ontological connection between man and the animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in general.

Also the media will usually show this as a clash of Sikhs and make it seem like we are all animals when in fact it is the just fighting back the radicals, so again the media plays to the unfounded fears of the public about Sikhs.

In fact, what passes as starfish humor... invariably has to do with how stupid it is to be an animal and not be able to move about.