High beverage sugar as well as high
animal protein intake at infancy may increase overweight risk at 8 years: a prospective longitudinal pilot study
Not exact matches
At the same time, their
intake of trans fatty acids,
animal protein, sodium, cholesterol and sugars significantly decreased by 14, 9, 21, 17 and 13 %, respectively.
Revised resolution: Reduce your meat
intake «Lean
animal proteins should take up no more than a quarter of your plate
at each meal,» says DeFazio.
«But when we looked deeper into the data, we found that —
at similar levels of
animal protein intake — those in the unhealthy lifestyle group consumed more red meats, eggs, and high - fat dairy, while the healthy lifestyle group consumed more fish and poultry.»
Overall, total
protein intake from all
animal and plant sources was not associated with risk
at all.
Fish supplies more than 3 billion people with
at least 15 percent of their average
animal protein intake, says Richard Grainger, senior FAO fisheries expert.
Breast cancer is associated with dietary fat (which is associated with
animal protein intake) and inversely with age
at menarche (women who reach puberty
at younger ages have a greater risk of breast cancer).
Indeed, when we look
at the variable «non-fish
animal protein intake,» the correlation with «death from all cancers» is a measly 0.03, which is even less than the correlation with plant
protein (0.12).
For example, instead of looking
at the effects of
animal protein on an intermediate marker of bone health, like calcium, why not just look directly
at studies that examine the relationship between
animal protein intake and more specific markers of bone health, like bone mass or bone microarchitecture or bone strength?
(
Animal protein itself, for the record, correlates with breast cancer
at +12 — which is lower than breast cancer's correlation with light - colored vegetables, legume
intake, fruit, and a number of other purportedly healthy plant foods.)
Recently, Biochemist and popular bloggist, Dr. Rhonda Patrick has commented on this 2016 JAMA study looking
at associate btw plant - based vs.
animal protein intake and all - cause mortality, and other markers.
To eliminate uric acid kidney stones, drinking
at least ten cups of water per day and reducing
animal protein and salt
intake may do the trick.
Question for Dr Greger - I am working with a patient, the above studies that you mention (
protein intake and IGF - 1 levels and the one that looked
at non
animal protein vs
animal protein intake and IGF - 1 levels?
A colleague informed him of a startling trend: liver cancer was plaguing affluent Filipinos
at a much higher rate than their less - wealthy counterparts — a phenomenon that, despite a slew of other lifestyle differences, Campbell believed was linked to their higher
intake of
animal protein.1 Bolstering his suspicions, Campbell also learned of a recent study from India showing that a high
protein intake spurred liver cancer in rats, while a low
protein intake seemed to prevent it.2 Intrigued by this gem of little - known research, Campbell decided to investigate the role of nutrition in cancer growth himself — an endeavor that ended up lasting several decades and producing over one hundred publications (none of which pertained to Fight Club).3
At one time, we thought that this explained the lower rates of hip fractures in countries with lower
animal protein intakes.
As Dr. Greger mentioned in his video, high
intake of fat does lead to reflux symptoms, so I'd suggest further looking
at areas of your husband's diet that fat can be reduced (reading nutrition labels to look for added oils / fat that, choosing plant
protein in place of
animal protein, cutting back on fat that is added while cooking).
Conclusions and Relevance High
animal protein intake was positively associated with cardiovascular mortality and high plant
protein intake was inversely associated with all - cause and cardiovascular mortality, especially among individuals with
at least 1 lifestyle risk factor.
Findings In this cohort study, high
intake of
animal protein was positively associated with mortality, with the inverse true for high
intake of plant
protein, especially among individuals with
at least 1 lifestyle risk factor.
Interestingly, in this study, we found that the association of
animal and plant
protein with mortality varied by lifestyle factors, and any statistically significant
protein - mortality associations were restricted to participants with
at least 1 of the unhealthy behaviors, including smoking, heavy alcohol
intake, overweight or obesity, and physical inactivity.
Although higher
intake of
animal protein was associated with higher cardiovascular mortality and higher
intake of plant
protein was associated with lower mortality, these associations were confined to participants with
at least 1 lifestyle risk factor.
High
animal protein intake was positively associated with cardiovascular mortality and high plant
protein intake was inversely associated with all - cause and cardiovascular mortality, especially among individuals with
at least 1 lifestyle risk factor.