On Monday, a U.K. court convicted four animal - rights activists of threatening companies that supply an animal testing laboratory, a verdict that U.K. scientists see as a turning point in efforts to protect
animal researchers against illegal attacks.
In a verdict that U.K. scientists see as a turning point in efforts to protect
animal researchers against illegal attacks, a British court yesterday convicted four people of conspiring to blackmail companies that supply an animal testing laboratory.
Not exact matches
For the past three decades,
researchers and health workers have engaged in a similar battle
against one of the most cunning viruses to afflict humanity and much of the
animal world: the dread influenza virus.
The amicus brief cited examples from an array of groups increasingly using public records laws to gain access to emails beyond those of climate scientists, including
animal rights groups that have long waged legal battles
against researchers who use
animals in their studies and opponents of genetically modified organisms seeking to expose the emails of scientists in efforts to demonstrate links to industry.
Not only microbes protect
against asthma evidently, but also farm
animals: Petting cats and cows and drinking farm milk can also prevent asthma, as the team of
researchers headed up by Remo Frei of the Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research from the University of Zurich in cooperation with the Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK - CARE) in Davos and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Switzerland in St. Gallen: «Early childhood contact with
animals and the consumption of food of
animal origin seems to regulate the inflammatory reactions of the immune system,» says immunologist Frei.
In a first for any
animal, including humans, four cows injected with a type of HIV protein rapidly produced powerful antibodies
against the virus,
researchers report.
The
researchers then took blood samples from the dogs, developed DNA profiles for each
animal and compared the DNA findings
against the staff's initial assessments.
Researchers who conduct
animal studies often don't use simple safeguards
against biases that have become standard in human clinical trials — or at least they don't report doing so in their scientific papers, making it impossible for readers to ascertain the quality of the work, an analysis of more than 2500 journal articles shows.
Some will argue
against a new layer of regulation — yet,
researchers continued to make new discoveries after new federal standards on human subjects, care of research
animals, and so on brought sweeping improvements to practices that had formerly produced unacceptable results.
When the
researchers injected mice with antibodies from vaccinated people in the study, the
animals were protected
against subsequent exposure to Zika virus, unlike mice that were injected with antibodies from participants who received placebo.
The
researchers can then check the genetic sequences
against databases to learn which plants or
animals they come from.
Insight into this mechanism led the
researchers to design new peptides — snippets of the human B7 - 2 receptor protein — that powerfully block the binding of a superantigen to its costimulatory receptor targets, and thereby protect
against lethal toxic shock, as they showed in
animals.
There have been several pointed attacks
against researchers who use
animals in their experiments in Germany.
Researchers from The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston have developed new potential vaccines that protect
animals against the bacteria that causes the deadly plague.
Researchers at the University of Maryland and Duke University have designed a novel protein - sugar vaccine candidate that, in an
animal model, stimulated an immune response
against sugars that form a protective shield around HIV.
In experiments in
animals,
researchers from the University of Michigan Medical School showed that adding rapamycin to an immunotherapy approach strengthened the immune response
against brain tumor cells.
Although the scientific community widely sees nonhuman primates as essential for advances in biomedicine (they have facilitated major gains in the fights
against AIDS and neurological diseases such as Parkinson's, for example),
researchers agree more can be done to treat the
animals more humanely and conduct research less wastefully.
Now,
researchers at Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and their colleagues have shown that amyloid - β can protect
against yeast and bacterial infections in two
animal models, as well as in cultured human cells.
When they plotted the number of tracks
against the dose of radioactive Cesium experienced in different parts of the reserve, the
researchers found that radiation levels aren't correlated with
animal abundance.
In another study,
researchers found that boron supplements can increase bone formation and help to protect
against osteoporosis in
animals.
Now, a
researcher with funding from Morris
Animal Foundation is investigating a new way to vaccinate bats
against rabies.
Veterinary oncologists and medical
researchers studying pet
animal cancer are perhaps the single most untapped source of relevant clinical data in the fight
against cancer in people.
She was one of eight recipients of a Young
Researchers Award, each worth £ 10,000, which is part of the 2017 Lush Prize awarded by Lush Cosmetics for innovations in the fight
against animal testing.
Using the Ethical Consumer's extensive database, our
researchers rate both the product and the company behind the product
against more than 20
animal welfare, environmental and human rights criteria.
It is the same sort of loss of perspective (although less extreme in degree) as that which leads
animal rights activists to commit crimes
against researchers.
Eric Sanford, a
researcher at the University of California, Davis, and co-author of the study said that «there are likely limits to how much this mechanism can buffer this
animal against global change.»