Sentences with phrase «animal suffering not»

It's provides flexible protection when there are new situations of animal suffering not covered by existing welfare laws.

Not exact matches

Clean meat does not require that animals suffer or die.

One that is just, and merciful, and concerned with how we treat each other and our world (because yes, the Tanach has instructions on how we are to treat even our animals)... or one that just makes willy - nilly laws, fails to spell out what he wants in a single, comprehensive passage (since there are conflicting passages all through the bible), and then gets his rocks off on sending people to «hell» to suffer eternally when they don't figure it out right.

A paraphilia is a disorder that is characterized by recurrent intense sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies generally involving: nonhuman objects; the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner (not merely simulated); or animals, children, or other nonconsenting persons.

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

Without such ecosystems the individual animal about whose suffering we are concerned would not even exist.

I'm not saying the unnecessary suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is no more rational, no more based on fact, than that of the people you are arguing against.

When eating meat not only causes suffering to animals but also deprives the world's poor of needed food, it will certainly not be justified.

Because animals can suffer, we have ethical obligations not to inflict upon them more pain, relative to their capacities for sentience, than we would inflict on creatures of our own kind, relative to our capacities.

But in the present situation, where the meat that comes to our table usually represents extended suffering on the part of the animal whose body we eat, we recognize that withdrawal of support from the whole system through vegetarianism is a fully appropriate, if not morally mandated, position.

We would not interfere with the wilderness ways in which animals suffer and are killed by one another, but we think that there is far more, and far less necessary, suffering among creatures for whom human beings have assumed responsibility.

My god wouldn't allow children and animals to suffer.

His good creation was not intended to function this way, but since He gave humans, angels, and even animals (to a degree) the freedom to make genuine choices, we sometimes use this freedom in ways that are contrary to the will and desire of God, and when we do this, the forces of nature suffer the consequences, and chaos rages over the face of earth, wreaking havoc, destroying lives, and bringing destruction in its wake.

The qualitative distinction between physical suffering (of animals) and spiritual suffering (of humans) is not drawn out.

Hey, LA, when your 15 - year - old dog stops eating, can't walk, and is subsequently diagnosed with bone cancer, do you just let the animal suffer, or do you actually have balls enough to provide a humane death?

In the third place, there is, as I have already said, no intentional inflicting of evil in most if not all suffering in the animal world.

At the same time, he insisted that it is quite wrong for us to inflict any unnecessary suffering on animals — which was why he opposed «blood sports,» although he was not a vegetarian.

Again, when he observes the pitiful cries and frightened appearance of birds and animals about to be slaughtered, he can not help feeling an «inability to bear» their sufferings.

I bring the conversation up because it came to mind last week when I was reading about a Christian ethicist so passionately committed to defending the (unmistakably) exceptional nature of human beings that he thinks it necessary to forbid his children any sentimental solicitude for the suffering of beasts, and to disabuse them of the least trace of the dangerous fantasy or pathetic fallacy that animals experience anything analogous to human emotions, motives, or needs; they can not really, he insists, know anxiety, grief, regret, or disappointment, and so we should never allow them to divert our sympathies or ethical longings from their proper object.

[53] This radical understanding of suffering caused one fur - trapper to remark that animal protectionists would not be happy even if we trapped and killed the animals with «sweet dreams and tender kisses.»

Even if animals in factory - farms were anesthetized, and thus could not suffer, there would still be reason to protest at depriving them of their natural fulfillments.

[33] Finally, if killing or harming animals is wrong or not God's perfect will, then Christ's perfection is in doubt (Heb 9:14) as he was directly and indirectly involved in the infliction of death and suffering upon animals.

For example, most animal protectionists will argue that the mere death of the animal (unless to end suffering not induced by humans) is by definition cruel, as the animal will have lost its expectation of life.

Not our differences and distinctions, — we feel — no, but our common animal essence of patience under suffering and enduring effort must be what redeems us in the Deity's sight.

Animal activists also fail to remind the public that the problems of pain / suffering and injuries to non-targets are not exclusively the domain of footholds.

Duranty's morals are neatly summed up in one of his 1935 dispatches: «It may be objected that the vivisection of living animals is a sad and dreadful thing, and it is true that the lot of [those] who have opposed the Soviet experiment is not a happy one,» but «in both cases, the suffering inflicted is done with a noble purpose.»

As I re-read the story it seemed obvious it couldn't really be history — or if it was, it was completely unverifiable: Eve is created from Adam's rib; a snake converses with and tempts Eve; God puts a very desirable fruit tree in the garden then commands man not to eat it; eating this fruit causes all the world's pain and suffering; God curses Adam, Eve, their descendents, and the earth; «every living thing» is destroyed by a worldwide flood; all our modern animals descend from the originals on Noah's Ark; and so on.

Chickens and geese and all wild animals do the same thing... Only man, who after all is rational, does not spring to the aid of his suffering neighbour in time of need and has no pity on him.»

But if we decide that it is acceptable to treat humans worse than we treat animals, it should not surprise us if many people at the grassroots level decide that as along as they have to die like a dog, they would rather not suffer the fate of an abandoned stray.

Not only do the animals suffer from this cruel trade but it also has serious negative effects on the environment, contributing to climate change, pollution and water contamination.

The goal of most vegans is to reduce animal suffering and cooking your veggie burger on a different grill isn't going to do that.

When laws are failing, and caring eyes aren't watching, animals are at greatest risk — of abuse, neglect and extreme suffering.

This simply can not be justified when we know that all animals share the ability to suffer.»

Evidence is mounting that Australian government regulations can not protect animals from extreme suffering in the live export trade.

Animals suffer and die at sea: Regulations require that pregnant cows are provided with additional space and bedding, but these animals received no special care, as they should not have been on this shAnimals suffer and die at sea: Regulations require that pregnant cows are provided with additional space and bedding, but these animals received no special care, as they should not have been on this shanimals received no special care, as they should not have been on this shipment.

The graphic video also documents prolonged suffering of pigs used for breeding who are confined in gestation crates, two - foot - wide metal cages so small the animals can't even turn around, rendering them virtually immobilized for almost their entire lives.

The graphic videos document prolonged suffering of pigs used for breeding who are confined in cages so small the animals can't even turn around, rendering them virtually immobilized for their entire lives.

Vets say the trade is «not commercially viable» without animals suffering.

Was it because you wanted to reduce the amount of animal suffering by not giving money to those companies?

Much of the cruelty witnessed over the years has been the result of individuals buying animals for private or backyard slaughter or fearful and un-trained workers not having the training or the equipment to manage large, frightened animals in a way that would at least reduce their suffering.

Animals Australia's investigations have forced significant industry reform but even today, Australian government live export regulations do not require pre-slaughter stunning, so most exported animals suffer through the pain and distress of having their throats cut while fully conAnimals Australia's investigations have forced significant industry reform but even today, Australian government live export regulations do not require pre-slaughter stunning, so most exported animals suffer through the pain and distress of having their throats cut while fully conanimals suffer through the pain and distress of having their throats cut while fully conscious.

«They did not claim to have suffered any physical damage or injury to themselves, to their animals or to their land at Eagle Rest,» he said.

It does not make ethical or economic sense to send animals half way around the world — subjecting them to the unavoidable stress and suffering inherent to long distance transport — just so they can be killed for their meat in importing countries.

Aramark's policy will ensure that millions of animals won't ever know the suffering that comes from a lifetime inside a cage.

It is highly effective in healing sore and cracked nipples but suffer from few drawbacks like allergic reactions, animal source and possibility of pesticide (not a concern in high grade lanolin creams)

Defence minister Philip Dunne stated: «As part of the licensing process, the researchers have to convince the Home Office that the work is required, that the results can not be obtained without the use of animals and that every step has been taken to minimise pain and suffering to the animals involved.»

Under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, people have a duty of care not only to ensure that an animal doesn't suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the animal's welfare needs arAnimal Welfare Act 2006, people have a duty of care not only to ensure that an animal doesn't suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the animal's welfare needs aranimal doesn't suffer unnecessarily, but also to take reasonable steps to ensure that the animal's welfare needs aranimal's welfare needs are met.

The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) claims the plans ignore the losses country businesses could suffer and said farmers would face greater liability for farm animals and buildings not designed for public use in areas where no access previously existed.

The animals treated with the new approach didn't appear to suffer any adverse effects from the therapy, Goldberg remarks.

NAVS maintains that not only is animal testing of any kind inhumane, but it's also more expensive and less reliable than other methods which do not rely on inflicting pain and suffering on rabbits and other furry friends.