Sentences with phrase «animals as a means of population control»

We respond to calls from shelter and rescue groups that are forced to destroy animals as a means of population control, and we respond to the cries of so many dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens in peril that count on us to save their lives.
In addition, killing homeless animals as a means of population control is publicly unpalatable.

Not exact matches

Our mission is to provide moral, financial, and medical support for those fostering homeless pets; to end the practice of euthanasia as a means of population control, instead relying on spay and neuter and trap and return programs; and to create a sanctuary for animals not yet placed in foster or permanent homes.
The Wagmore Foundation is proud to support a county - wide partnership that does not use animal euthanasia as a means of population control.
Provides accessible and affordable spay / neuter solutions for companion animals and free - roaming cats with the goal to eliminate euthanasia as a means of population control.
Spay and Neuter Kansas City provides low - cost spay and neuter services for underserved areas of the city and families in need as a means of animal population control, to lower shelter intake, and for those pets to have healthy lives.
As technology and research continues to progress, we are committed to providing the best means of humane animal population control available and look forward to the day when non surgical sterilization is safe and effective.
As evidenced by three decades of trapping and killing, lethal means for controlling homeless animal populations is not the answer.
She has extensive experience helping shelters move away from euthanasia as a means of population control and helping municipalities revise public policy to be more animal friendly.
Our vision is to eliminate euthanasia as a means of population control for animals in our community.
Pinellas County Commissioners and Pinellas County Animal Services endorse TNVR as the best means of controlling and reducing the feral cat population.
Today, DC Animal Control Code § 8 - 1802 directs the city's animal control agency, the Washington Humane Society (WHS), to promote both reducing euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals as well as «The utilization of trap, spay or neuter, and return practices as a means of controlling the feral cat population; provided, that all efforts shall be made to adopt out a trapped, tamable kitten.&Animal Control Code § 8 - 1802 directs the city's animal control agency, the Washington Humane Society (WHS), to promote both reducing euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals as well as «The utilization of trap, spay or neuter, and return practices as a means of controlling the feral cat population; provided, that all efforts shall be made to adopt out a trapped, tamable kitten.Control Code § 8 - 1802 directs the city's animal control agency, the Washington Humane Society (WHS), to promote both reducing euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals as well as «The utilization of trap, spay or neuter, and return practices as a means of controlling the feral cat population; provided, that all efforts shall be made to adopt out a trapped, tamable kitten.&animal control agency, the Washington Humane Society (WHS), to promote both reducing euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals as well as «The utilization of trap, spay or neuter, and return practices as a means of controlling the feral cat population; provided, that all efforts shall be made to adopt out a trapped, tamable kitten.control agency, the Washington Humane Society (WHS), to promote both reducing euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals as well as «The utilization of trap, spay or neuter, and return practices as a means of controlling the feral cat population; provided, that all efforts shall be made to adopt out a trapped, tamable kitten.»
Ideally the operation of the program is legalized and codified by the adoption of a local ordinance to regulate the circumstance and procedures under which the cats are humanely trapped and returned as a means of controlling the community cat population and a compassionate alternative to putting healthy animals to death.
In nations without well - established animal care and control policies, such as Ukraine, Greece, Egypt and Romania, stray animals are eliminated by any means possible and barbaric methods including beating, poisoning and hanging are oftentimes used, and are even encouraged, as effective ways to cull stray populations of cats and dogs.
Sterilisation as a means of controlling the community cat population has been carried out by members of the public using their own resources, with support from the Cat Welfare Society's reimbursement scheme and the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal's sterilisation voucher scheme for the past 7 years.
Unlike traditional animal shelters that follow the standard cage - and - kill operating model, no - kill shelters don't use euthanasia as a primary means of population or disease control.
Many other animal sheltering agencies followed suit, leading to an often heated and ongoing philosophical debate about the use of euthanasia as a primary means of shelter population control.
changing migration patterns of birds and other animals that affect by direct means (foraging, excrement) and indirect means (control of pests, affects on populations of beneficial insects such as bee populations and so on) 5.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z