If a pit bull has an owner who is dedicated to safety, he'll work hard to teach his dog never to harm others, whether
animals or human beings.
Many studies have been made that have shown that the feline leukemia virus is not passed to other
animals or human beings.
Lion craft Paper plates make an excellent base for creating many crafts and faces whether
animal or human are easy to create.
But what happens when we can not recognize
an animal or a human being on the basis of a face, but only have other body parts to go on?
Semen discharged by
an animal or human is known as ejaculate, and the process of discharge is called ejaculation.
In many cases, the cause of skin disease in cats may be communicable to other cats (and, in some cases, to people), so preventing transmission to other
animals or humans is often an important component of a treatment plan.
If
an animal or human is exposed to rabies but is treated in a timely fashion, it is considered 100 % treatable.
It is easy to overlook, especially if your dog is in its prime, however, your aging animal has new needs that must be met just as with any other aging
animal or human being.
Ticks can cause disease by transmitting bacteria and microbes when they bite
an animal or human They are...
Parts of it remind us of the profile of
an animal or a human being.
Not exact matches
«We also wanted it to
be something kids could imagine as anything — we didn't want it to
be something they
were already familiar with like a four - legged
animal or two - legged
human — so it has three legs... and one eye.»
Without a great deal of validated
animal data
or preliminary
human data, this
is a tough one to raise money for.»
Anything charged with the 24/7 sheltering and feeding of
humans or animals is unlikely to shut down entirely.
We
're in love with one other person... we
are connected to them in deep ways that only
humans (not
humans and tools
or animals) can
be.
Two questions come immediately to mind: (I) whether real
human kindness and sympathy
are,
or can
be, encountered in the slaughterhouse, in the circus and the rodeo, in the forced captivity of wild
animals in zoos, and in pain research in biomedical laboratories, and (2) whether our abuse and destruction of members of other sentient species for our benefit alone can
be a truly moral goal for mankind.
Much of the effect can likely
be explained by researchers unconsciously giving hints
or suggestions to their
human or animal subjects, perhaps in something as subtle as body language
or tone of voice.
Having
or practicing a religion
is one of many things that separates
humans from
animals.
Actually in the universe there
is no right
or wrong... this
is a
human invention...
animals don't even subscribe to this concept.
@Chad «You seemingly have determined that all
animals /
humans are essentially the same as rocks...» @ Saraswati Yep, more
or less, though I don't use the exact terminology you use in the rest of the sentence regarding determinism, but lets go with «close enough».
Many species clearly demonstrate the same principle, so it
is an evolved trait among social
animals, and existed long before
humans or any of the religions man has created.
believerfred «Thor and the like
are man made from known matter and energy with most having
human or other
animal physiology»
Without diving into wether
or not
animals have souls (which I don't believe)
or are even self aware (which I
'm also fairly certain they
are not), why should I compare instint, non-ceribrial behavior (at best purely sexual) to
human?
To
be specific, a
human being or higher - order
animal organism
is an ongoing subject of experience in and through its dominant subsociety of occasions; but the coordination therewith required to sustain the flow of consciousness can only
be achieved through the collaboration and coordination of millions of sub-fields of activity, subordinate layers of social order, within the organism.
To me, it
's almost obvious that a deity didn't not create the
human mind,
or the
animals mind,
or any mind.
Our natural capacities and tendencies must actually
be realized
or expressed, and a culture - making
animal like the
human being realizes and expresses them in all kinds of different ways.
It
is customary and even ethically mandatory that experimentation that carries with it a substantial degree of risk to
human subjects first
be tested in an
animal laboratory
or, at the very least, on a computer model.
You do not have to
be a religious zealot
or a scientific Luddite to oppose the patenting of
animal and
human organisms and genes.
Thus we can
be tempted to treat
humans as mere
animals, e.g. though slavery
or abortion, and to sentimentalise
animals as if they
were human.
Are human beings unique, or are we just another species of anim
Are human beings unique,
or are we just another species of anim
are we just another species of
animal?
If we view the soul as an effective social system for the procurement of intense experience, we can legitimately apply to it Whitehead's statement in «Immortality» that «the more effective social systems involve a large infusion of various soils of personalities as subordinate elements in their make - up — for example, an
animal body,
or a society of
animals, such as
human beings» (IMM 690).
behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner's students at Harvard began to apply to
human beings his methods of instrumental
or operant conditioning, (3) developed during a quarter century of laboratory research mainly with
animals.
At first glance, it seems like a harmless action and we would
be tempted to ignore it until we dig deeper into the links between cruelty to
animals and cruelty to
humans,
or until we begin to see the ox as a victim too.
To propose
or defend
human sexual promiscuity, as some do today,
is to say that we
are animals, with an
animal sexual instinct, no more.
Animals are not humans and I've never read a scripture of Jesus» pertaining to animals having a soul or being responsible for their a
Animals are not
humans and I've never read a scripture of Jesus» pertaining to
animals having a soul or being responsible for their a
animals having a soul
or being responsible for their actions.
Singer
was more responsible than anyone else for making the term «speciesism» known, beginning in 1975 with his highly influential book
Animal Liberation and continuing with his widely professed proposal that so - called
human non-persons can
be killed (infanticide
or non-voluntary euthanasia) because of their «lower» moral status.
It
's popular to pretend condemned criminals like Larry Nassar
are animals or monsters, not
human beings; but Christians do not have that luxury.
Whatever
is self - aware
or able to value its own life (for example)
is designated as a «person,» even if it
is an
animal, while people lacking these attributes
are denigrated as
human «non-persons» — an invidious category that includes all of the unborn, as well as (for many bioethics practitioners) infants and those with profound cognitive disabilities.
scot, It
's one thing to believe so deeply that you eschew evolution
or the biological fact that
humans are animals, it
's entirely another to willfully misrepresent statements by others to support your position, and to deride and taunt people with other positions.
Cartesians — taking the theologically grounded refusal to believe in spirits
or worry about the influence of final causes to some sort of plausible limit — believed that «
animals»
were insentient, and that only
humans had goals
or thoughts
or feelings.
[13] This said, in
animals lower than
humans it
is morally permissible to thwart the purposes of bodily organs, so that the Church fully permits the sterilisation of
animals (if it doesn't cause unreasonable cruelty to them
or damage to the material environment).
Sexuality in our age
is almost completely dominated by the stimulus of bodily attraction, that
is, the male - female mode of sexual power
or that power of attraction which
humans have in common with the
animals.
Indeed, the
animal rights movement's fury against the speciesist use of
animals» a necessary element for
human flourishing, particularly in medical research» has increased to the point that scientists
are now under threat of death by the most radical liberationists for daring to experiment on rats
or monkeys to find cures for cancer and other
human afflictions.
But the description of man as a rational
or intellectual
animal, familiar in the Middle Ages,
is dangerous unless full recognition
is also given to the feeling - tones which
are as much a part of
human existence as
is human rationality.
The more power and authority a
human has over another person (
or an
animal) the more compassion they
are required to show.
To think of the self relationally
is to think of its very existence as affected
or constituted by the world external to the body, that
is, by other
humans, by plants and other
animals, by the earth, and by the sky.
The point of all this
is that dominance
is the one
animal instinct the
human race either inherited from its primate forebears and retained after losing all the other instincts,
or acquired by imitating this
animal behavior when the
human race fell from a higher nature.
Regarding the latter, classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to
humans (
Or perhaps also to certain higher
animals), 1 while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination
is characteristic of all
beings.
Classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to
humans (
or perhaps also to certain higher
animals), while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination
is characteristic of all
beings.
The fact that some
animals can not reason
or talk in language we understand should
be as irrelevant to us as
is the fact that some
humans in relation to whom we have ethical obligations — severely retarded children, for example — can neither reason nor talk.
I
am NOT saying that we need to worship the earth, treat
animals as more important than
humans,
or pray to the sun and trees.