Sentences with phrase «animals or human beings»

If a pit bull has an owner who is dedicated to safety, he'll work hard to teach his dog never to harm others, whether animals or human beings.
Many studies have been made that have shown that the feline leukemia virus is not passed to other animals or human beings.
Lion craft Paper plates make an excellent base for creating many crafts and faces whether animal or human are easy to create.
But what happens when we can not recognize an animal or a human being on the basis of a face, but only have other body parts to go on?
Semen discharged by an animal or human is known as ejaculate, and the process of discharge is called ejaculation.
In many cases, the cause of skin disease in cats may be communicable to other cats (and, in some cases, to people), so preventing transmission to other animals or humans is often an important component of a treatment plan.
If an animal or human is exposed to rabies but is treated in a timely fashion, it is considered 100 % treatable.
It is easy to overlook, especially if your dog is in its prime, however, your aging animal has new needs that must be met just as with any other aging animal or human being.
Ticks can cause disease by transmitting bacteria and microbes when they bite an animal or human They are...
Parts of it remind us of the profile of an animal or a human being.

Not exact matches

«We also wanted it to be something kids could imagine as anything — we didn't want it to be something they were already familiar with like a four - legged animal or two - legged human — so it has three legs... and one eye.»
Without a great deal of validated animal data or preliminary human data, this is a tough one to raise money for.»
Anything charged with the 24/7 sheltering and feeding of humans or animals is unlikely to shut down entirely.
We're in love with one other person... we are connected to them in deep ways that only humans (not humans and tools or animals) can be.
Two questions come immediately to mind: (I) whether real human kindness and sympathy are, or can be, encountered in the slaughterhouse, in the circus and the rodeo, in the forced captivity of wild animals in zoos, and in pain research in biomedical laboratories, and (2) whether our abuse and destruction of members of other sentient species for our benefit alone can be a truly moral goal for mankind.
Much of the effect can likely be explained by researchers unconsciously giving hints or suggestions to their human or animal subjects, perhaps in something as subtle as body language or tone of voice.
Having or practicing a religion is one of many things that separates humans from animals.
Actually in the universe there is no right or wrong... this is a human invention... animals don't even subscribe to this concept.
@Chad «You seemingly have determined that all animals / humans are essentially the same as rocks...» @ Saraswati Yep, more or less, though I don't use the exact terminology you use in the rest of the sentence regarding determinism, but lets go with «close enough».
Many species clearly demonstrate the same principle, so it is an evolved trait among social animals, and existed long before humans or any of the religions man has created.
believerfred «Thor and the like are man made from known matter and energy with most having human or other animal physiology»
Without diving into wether or not animals have souls (which I don't believe) or are even self aware (which I'm also fairly certain they are not), why should I compare instint, non-ceribrial behavior (at best purely sexual) to human?
To be specific, a human being or higher - order animal organism is an ongoing subject of experience in and through its dominant subsociety of occasions; but the coordination therewith required to sustain the flow of consciousness can only be achieved through the collaboration and coordination of millions of sub-fields of activity, subordinate layers of social order, within the organism.
To me, it's almost obvious that a deity didn't not create the human mind, or the animals mind, or any mind.
Our natural capacities and tendencies must actually be realized or expressed, and a culture - making animal like the human being realizes and expresses them in all kinds of different ways.
It is customary and even ethically mandatory that experimentation that carries with it a substantial degree of risk to human subjects first be tested in an animal laboratory or, at the very least, on a computer model.
You do not have to be a religious zealot or a scientific Luddite to oppose the patenting of animal and human organisms and genes.
Thus we can be tempted to treat humans as mere animals, e.g. though slavery or abortion, and to sentimentalise animals as if they were human.
Are human beings unique, or are we just another species of animAre human beings unique, or are we just another species of animare we just another species of animal?
If we view the soul as an effective social system for the procurement of intense experience, we can legitimately apply to it Whitehead's statement in «Immortality» that «the more effective social systems involve a large infusion of various soils of personalities as subordinate elements in their make - up — for example, an animal body, or a society of animals, such as human beings» (IMM 690).
behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner's students at Harvard began to apply to human beings his methods of instrumental or operant conditioning, (3) developed during a quarter century of laboratory research mainly with animals.
At first glance, it seems like a harmless action and we would be tempted to ignore it until we dig deeper into the links between cruelty to animals and cruelty to humans, or until we begin to see the ox as a victim too.
To propose or defend human sexual promiscuity, as some do today, is to say that we are animals, with an animal sexual instinct, no more.
Animals are not humans and I've never read a scripture of Jesus» pertaining to animals having a soul or being responsible for their aAnimals are not humans and I've never read a scripture of Jesus» pertaining to animals having a soul or being responsible for their aanimals having a soul or being responsible for their actions.
Singer was more responsible than anyone else for making the term «speciesism» known, beginning in 1975 with his highly influential book Animal Liberation and continuing with his widely professed proposal that so - called human non-persons can be killed (infanticide or non-voluntary euthanasia) because of their «lower» moral status.
It's popular to pretend condemned criminals like Larry Nassar are animals or monsters, not human beings; but Christians do not have that luxury.
Whatever is self - aware or able to value its own life (for example) is designated as a «person,» even if it is an animal, while people lacking these attributes are denigrated as human «non-persons» — an invidious category that includes all of the unborn, as well as (for many bioethics practitioners) infants and those with profound cognitive disabilities.
scot, It's one thing to believe so deeply that you eschew evolution or the biological fact that humans are animals, it's entirely another to willfully misrepresent statements by others to support your position, and to deride and taunt people with other positions.
Cartesians — taking the theologically grounded refusal to believe in spirits or worry about the influence of final causes to some sort of plausible limit — believed that «animals» were insentient, and that only humans had goals or thoughts or feelings.
[13] This said, in animals lower than humans it is morally permissible to thwart the purposes of bodily organs, so that the Church fully permits the sterilisation of animals (if it doesn't cause unreasonable cruelty to them or damage to the material environment).
Sexuality in our age is almost completely dominated by the stimulus of bodily attraction, that is, the male - female mode of sexual power or that power of attraction which humans have in common with the animals.
Indeed, the animal rights movement's fury against the speciesist use of animals» a necessary element for human flourishing, particularly in medical research» has increased to the point that scientists are now under threat of death by the most radical liberationists for daring to experiment on rats or monkeys to find cures for cancer and other human afflictions.
But the description of man as a rational or intellectual animal, familiar in the Middle Ages, is dangerous unless full recognition is also given to the feeling - tones which are as much a part of human existence as is human rationality.
The more power and authority a human has over another person (or an animal) the more compassion they are required to show.
To think of the self relationally is to think of its very existence as affected or constituted by the world external to the body, that is, by other humans, by plants and other animals, by the earth, and by the sky.
The point of all this is that dominance is the one animal instinct the human race either inherited from its primate forebears and retained after losing all the other instincts, or acquired by imitating this animal behavior when the human race fell from a higher nature.
Regarding the latter, classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to humans (Or perhaps also to certain higher animals), 1 while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination is characteristic of all beings.
Classical theologians typically limit self - determining (free) creatures on this earth to humans (or perhaps also to certain higher animals), while process theologians typically would affirm that creative self - determination is characteristic of all beings.
The fact that some animals can not reason or talk in language we understand should be as irrelevant to us as is the fact that some humans in relation to whom we have ethical obligations — severely retarded children, for example — can neither reason nor talk.
I am NOT saying that we need to worship the earth, treat animals as more important than humans, or pray to the sun and trees.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z