The link you include is about zooplankton... But if it is not a typo — then it depends on the time scale — if you are talking
annual average productivity then high lats are quite productive.
Not exact matches
Since the start of the economic recovery in 1991,
annual productivity growth has
averaged just under 2 per cent.
In 2002
average annual labour
productivity in Spain was around $ 42,000, compared to $ 61,000 in Germany or $ 83,000 in the United States.
Increasing
productivity by one per cent per year would add # 20bn to UK output and # 250 to the
average annual pay packet.
Historically, half of the economy's roughly 3 %
average annual growth rate has come from increasing the number of workers and half from raising the
productivity of all workers.
My thought is that the
average annual stock return of 6.5 percent is what it is because that is the return that has historically been supported by the
productivity of the U.S. economy.
Note how the
ANNUAL AREA under the black line (
average chorophyll therefore
average cyanobacterial
productivity) has risen markedly over the 5 - year period 2003 — 2007 while over the same period there has been minimal change in maximum daytime summer SSTs or minimum daytime winter SSTs.
Please project out a 3 %
average annual decrease in coal mine
productivity and project the cost of the coal that we would need to get to 1000ppm.
> According to the Shaping Energy Transitions report by The Energy Transitions Commission, to limit rising temperatures to below 2 °C, we need to 3 %
annual improvement in
average global energy
productivity through to 2050.
We show that overall economic
productivity is non-linear in temperature for all countries, with
productivity peaking at an
annual average temperature of 13 °C and declining strongly at higher temperatures.......»
«If you are a 150 person company with 11 [percent]
annual turnover, and you spend $ 25,000 per person on hiring, $ 10,000 on each for turnover and development, and lose $ 50,000 of
productivity opportunity cost on
average when refilling a role, then your
annual cost of turnover would be about $ 1.57 million.
The stats show that frequent users are increasing their
annual productivity at a rate greater than what the National Association of REALTORS ® (NAR) reported for year - over-year
average agent sales production growth last year.
From 2011 to 2016,
annual growth in
productivity has
averaged less than 1 %, the slowest five - year pace since the 1977 - 82 period.
Indeed, from 2011 to 2016,
annual growth in
productivity has
averaged less than 1 percent, the slowest five - year pace since the 1977 - 82 period.