Sentences with phrase «annually averaged temperature anomalies»

During the peak period 1930 — 40, the annually averaged temperature anomaly for the area 60 ° — 90 ° N amounted to some 1.7 °C.

Not exact matches

Since 1850, CO2 levels rose, as did the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (for what it's worth), but nobody knows whether or not the increase in CO2 had anything whatsoever to do with the warming.

All we know for sure is that it hasn't warmed (according to the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» record of HadCRUT) since the end of 1997.

I downloaded these data and plotted them against the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» record of HadCRUT3, to see if there was any correlation.

This was defined as the date when the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (HadCRUT3 at the time) would exceed that of 1990 by 0.5 ºC.

-- denying that the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (HadCRUT3) has cooled slightly over the past 15 years (since May 1997)

Did we have a better «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» in 1900 -LRB--0.142 C) than today (+0.339 C in 2011)?

We (that includes you and me plus Hansen, Trenberth, Jones and the IPCC) don't have an earthly notion what is going to happen to our «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» over the next two years, let alone the next few hundred years.

You are spending a lot of time rationalizing WHY there was a «standstill» in global warming (as measured by the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly»).

Your last post simply confirms that you are still in denial regarding the «standstill» in the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» over the past decade

The metric used by IPCC in all its reports for past and projected future «global warming» has been the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (as reported by HadCRUT3).

However you slice it, lolwot, there is a current «pause» (or «standstill») in the warming of the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (used by IPCC to measure «global warming»), despite unabated human GHG emissions and CO2 levels (Mauna Loa) reaching record levels.

If you are referring to the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly», then this indicator has shown «cooling» since the end of 2000 (12 years) and lack of warming since the end of 1997 (15 years).

Girma is showing you actual physical observations (warts and all) of the globally and annually average land and sea surface temperature anomaly over time.

As can be seen from the curve below, the HadCRUT3 «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» shows slight (if statistically insignificant) cooling over the past 15 years (180 months).

Doing this on a year - to - year basis shows NO apparent correlation with the absolute «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (i.e. HadCRUT3), but does show a weak correlation with the CHANGE in temperature from the previous year, for example:

Since 1850, the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (HadCRUT3 or 4) has shown a linear increase of 0.7 C.

But let's look at the long - term NOAA record of tropospheric specific humidity and compare this with the HadCRUT globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly over the same period:

All these «bets» on what is going to happen with the adjusted, variance - corrected and otherwise manipulated «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» are interesting but slightly silly IMO.