Regulation The new South Korean cryptocurrency account system has entered into force nationwide today, ending the current practice that allowed for
anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies.
Korean authorities subsequently moved to curb
anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies among domestic exchanges on January 30.
The new system is supposed to replace the existing virtual account system which allows for
the anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies.
The new South Korean cryptocurrency account system has entered into force nationwide today, ending the current practice that allowed for
anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies.
A week after the South Korean government banned
the anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies, under 10 % of virtual bank accounts have reportedly converted to real - name accounts.
Korean regulators mandated the use of a real - name trading system from January 30 wherein cryptocurrency traders and investors are required to use their real names with their cryptocurrency exchange accounts or wallets and bank accounts, a move to put an end to
the anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies.
Yeon's positive comments about Blockchain and cryptocurrencies come after a period of harsher restrictions on crypto investing and exchanges in South Korea, with the country's ban on
anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies and a false scare of an overall crypto ban making the markets dip.
As reported in late December, Korean authorities first set upon enforcing a ban on
anonymous trading of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin as a means to crack down on financial fraud, tax evasion and money laundering.
Not exact matches
A number
of the world's central banks, and the governments responsible for them, have called for tighter regulation
of cryptocurrencies in order to prevent misuse, deter
anonymous trading and boost transparency.
The country has banned
anonymous trading accounts, the use
of cryptocurrency exchanges abroad, and domestic ICOs.
Bloomberg (among others) reports that exchange operators decided to close down after in - person meetings with PBOC officials, and the Wall Street Journal reports — based on
anonymous sources — that the PBOC has prepared a set
of «draft instructions» that would ban
cryptocurrency trading altogether.
«First, the government
of South Korea will continue to struggle with
anonymous accounts used for
cryptocurrency trading and will punish market manipulations, money laundering, and fraudulent operations with investigations in which local law enforcement agencies and financial authorities will participate.
South Korea's financial watchdog has set a deadline for the barring
of anonymous cryptocurrency trading accounts within the country.
South Korea's financial watchdog has set a date for the introduction
of a new rule barring
anonymous virtual
cryptocurrency trading accounts.
Overseas, China is blocking offshore crypto platforms to protect against illicit issuance and fraud, while South Korea attempts to outlaw
anonymous trading but says it has «no intention»
of banning
cryptocurrency trading.
Whether you view your
cryptocurrency holdings as a secure and
anonymous form
of payment, a vehicle for short - term
trading or a long - term investment that could add to your wealth, your coins will do you no good if they disappear into the ether (pun intentional)-- or into the hands
of a hacker.
Seoul's biggest issue with
cryptocurrency trading is the level
of speculation in the market and the role
of anonymous accounts in spurring volatility.
It is similar to IPO, however
cryptocurrencies are
traded in the more
anonymous environment, and investors are not enough protected with lack
of cryptocurrency regulations.
Internationally, China is blocking offshore crypto platforms to protect against illicit issuance and fraud, while South Korea is trying to outlaw
anonymous accounts but has no intention
of banning
cryptocurrency trading.
In addition, government officials are banned from owning any forms
of cryptocurrency, while
anonymous trading has been outlawed within the nation's borders.
In addition, government officials are banned from owning any forms
of cryptocurrency, while
anonymous trading
South Korea
cryptocurrency exchanges are complaining
of unfair treatment as the country's ban on
anonymous trading begins Tuesday.
The Chinese government banned
cryptocurrency trading, Canadian authorities dragged ICOs under the jurisdiction
of securities law, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) warned that new rules for ICOs are imminent, and South Korea banned
anonymous trading.
One
of the main features
of Tidex is that users don't need to verify their identity to make
trades, allowing to remain
anonymous while performing any operations with
cryptocurrencies.
South Korean
cryptocurrency exchange Coinpia has disabled deposits and suspended
trading on its platform as a result
of new legislation against
anonymous accounts, according to an announcement on its website.
On Dec. 28, the South Korean government announced its plans to ban the use
of anonymous virtual accounts for
cryptocurrency trading in an effort to «curb virtual currency speculation», local news agency Yonhap reported.
First, on Jan. 23 South Korea's financial regulator set a date for the introduction
of a new rule barring
anonymous cryptocurrency trading accounts.
A number
of the world's central banks, and the governments responsible for them, have called for tighter regulation
of cryptocurrencies in order to prevent misuse, deter
anonymous trading and boost transparency.
Specifically, the official said the government will support «normal transactions»
of cryptocurrencies, three weeks to the day after the government moved to curtail
anonymous accounts
trading in crypto markets in late January.
Since last week, a wave
of controversy has arisen in South Korea over the government's attempts to more strictly regulate crypto markets, like the banning
of the use
of anonymous virtual accounts connected to crypto exchanges, forbidding underage citizens and foreigners to invest in crypto markets, and falsey announcing a total blanket ban on
cryptocurrency trading.
The vice chairman
of the Financial Services Commission, Kim Yong - beom announced several measures that would «ban
anonymous trading on domestic exchanges, while foreigners and minors would be completely banned from
trading through
cryptocurrency accounts.
Now, a week after the
anonymous trading ban came into effect, about 8 %
of virtual bank accounts for
cryptocurrency trading at Shinhan Bank, NH Bank and the Industrial Bank
of Korea have been converted to real - name accounts.
The government has also restricted
cryptocurrency trading, outlawing
anonymous virtual accounts at the end
of January.
While the amount
of the individual fines may not be significant, the move arrives just a day after the country's financial watchdog set a date for the formal cessation
of anonymous cryptocurrency trading, yet another signal
of the effort underway by the country's authorities to increase regulation
of cryptocurrency exchanges.
Bloomberg (among others) reports that exchange operators decided to close down after in - person meetings with PBOC officials, and the Wall Street Journal reports — based on
anonymous sources — that the PBOC has prepared a set
of «draft instructions» that would ban
cryptocurrency trading altogether.
Instead, new rules mandating the end
of anonymous cryptocurrency trading accounts have already kicked in after Korean banks began supporting
cryptocurrency exchanges with KYC - enabled accounts with traders» real - names from January 30.
South Korea, which is well known for the high public use
of cryptocurrencies, also implemented a crypto ban
of anonymous trading on
cryptocurrency exchanges this year.
Korean officials rounded off the month
of January by announcing on January 23, 2018, that
anonymous accounts would be banned from
trading cryptocurrencies as
of January 30, 2018.
The reported date to ban
anonymous trading comes within a month
of Korean authorities conducting onsite inspections
of multiple
cryptocurrency exchanges following the mid-December hack
of Seoul - based exchange Youbit.
As
of February, South Korea has mandated a ban on
anonymous cryptocurrency trading, a scheme which was rushed through at the end
of January and continues to cause bureaucratic difficulties
of its own as the ecosystem struggles to cope.
«Various scenarios such as the imposition
of value - added tax, a capital gains tax, or both on
trade,» another
anonymous source is quoted, «and the collection
of corporate tax from local
cryptocurrency exchanges, as well as the initiation
of authorized exchanges with licenses are being discussed,» adding transparency between ministries and banks will allow capital to be better monitored.