Bzdera set the basic frame twenty years ago when he described
the anonymous unanimous judgment as a standard high court device for constitutional questions on federalism issues — but the citations that accompany this bold claim bear on the «unanimous» rather than the «anonymous» aspect.
Not exact matches
At time of writing, the McLachlin Court has handed down more than a hundred
unanimous constitutional law decisions that meet some minimal threshold (arbitrarily but not unreasonably: reserved
judgments over 5,000 words in length), of which fewer than one in six attracts this
anonymous treatment.
There have been 20 reference cases in and after 1967; thirteen were
unanimous, and fourteen were resolved by joint
judgments,
anonymous in the sense that they lacked the normal author ‐ identifying attribution.