Sentences with phrase «answer couple of questions»

Could you answer a couple of questions?
Another thing I like to do is ask if they would be willing to answer a couple of questions via email instead of a call or if they know someone I should talk to about x, y, z!
In a group interview with several candidates, you likely will only have the opportunity to answer a couple of questions.
In order to use the service, you need to answer couple of questions which will be used by the insurers to analyze the best offer for you.
Simply answer a couple of questions concerning your trip itinerary when you apply online and in a minute or two you'll be able to view all - inclusive coverage and trip cancellation insurance plans from Canada's leading travel insurance providers.
In today's YouTube video we take a look at our personal Dreamcast collection and answer a couple of questions from our followers.
Susan was gracious enough to answer a couple of questions about this series and her love of video games.
You will answer a couple of questions to figure out how you played the last game and will then re-roll your Watcher.
Dear Hairy Dogfathers, Mind taking the time to answer a couple of questions for me?
You might also need to answer a couple of questions to establish your identity.
Next you'll fill out your basic information and answer a couple of questions.
I found Roger to be a fascinating person, so I had him answer a couple of questions for you.
Okay can someone answer me a couple of questions, Do I get the G2, HD7 that phone is a killer, looks arent everything but it does look nice, but Windows?
He asked if I'd be willing to answer a couple of questions at the microphone at the close of the broadcast.
Just download the app, give yourself a profile name, upload a photo (optional), and answer a couple of questions (also optional).
The guided communication process is where you and your match each answer a couple of questions about yourself.
Russian cupid dating site, which is a topic number one in today's article, made a decision to answer a couple of questions that will shortly describe its advantages and additional services it usually provides once you become a member of this huge community.
Just answer a couple of questions, and you'll be on your way.
I see this thread is about a year old, so not sure you'll see this Keenan, but I'm intrigued by the benefits you've found (I also have a major foot pain issue) yet at the same time I've found Peat's recommendations so strange that I thought hopefully you could answer a couple of questions.
You wan na answer a couple of questions here?
I took a glance at our trusty old reference site, Calcio e Finanza, to once again make a very dry finance post (just one look at my bank balance right now says everything about how little qualified I am for this) and answer a couple of questions following the never - say - die turn of events in Roma's 2017/18 Champions» League run.
My plan: make my meat - eating, refined sugar - loving, gluten - tolerating (Not fair btw) family LOVE these cookies.I was wondering if you may answer a couple of questions though, please?
So that should answer a couple of questions for you.
Likewise, you can also make new friends by answering a couple of questions generated by the site.
There was also a short Q&A, with the developers answering a couple of questions from fans.
Unfortunately, The Banner Saga only gets around to actually answering a couple of those questions.
Getting made several 1000 dollars inside a couple of days from just answering a couple of questions online on Avvo, it's possible to realise why I would suggest it in an effort to find new customers.
Best prices around (and I checked a lot of websites), fast delivery (I ordered my Lancaster seagrass rug on Monday and it was delivered on Saturday, and I live in NC), quality of the rug is excellent (I have other seagrass rugs in my home), and customer service was very prompt in answering a couple of questions before I made my order.

Not exact matches

To reduce the number of replies you're forced to type out hastily on your phone, use pre-saved «canned responses» to generate generic phrases and answers to frequently - asked questions in a couple of taps.
My brother asked me this question a couple of years ago and the answer is nothing, really.
These couples have actually met (and mated, though we don't know if they're still together), they're sometimes answering questions about matters of life and death, and they have much less incentive to lie.
I didn't have an answer for him but I did come back with a couple of questions — Why set up such an intricate bond ladder in the first place if you're not going to follow it?
I published a couple of things he had written and answered a bunch of his questions.
Done well, this process — which shouldn't take more than a couple of hours — will give you an extraordinarily effective and quick method to answer these questions and look like a content marketing genius to your boss or your client.
During the remainder of the show, Kent and a couple CFP's (certified financial planners) answer caller questions.
Here are a couple of sources, though (and I don't want to overload your little mind too much) there's this amazing thing called google, you can plug in questions and it feeds you answers like some sort of magic machine!
Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).
Inevitably, however, the question and answer session rapidly turned to the Big Healthcare News of the last couple of weeks.
As part of marriage preparation Catholics couples are paired with another catholic couple and they discuss how Natural Family Planning works and are available to answer questions.
The village atheist usually challenges believers in Providence to answer a couple of devastating questions.
Miller never explicitly answers this question, but her story testifies to the shallowness of modern love and of couples afraid to make the leap of faith into commitment and trust.
Sitting with a group of adolescents and answering their questions about your marriage might sound scary but it is actually a really life - giving and enriching experience for the couples who volunteer and the young people are often amazed and inspired to see that marriages can last and that love can grow through a life time.
And a couple more which have answered some of my long - standing questions are Lesslie Newbigin, Proper Confidence, and Nancey Murphy, Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism.
For my research, I have a couple of questions I'm seeking to answer: 1.
I haven't had a chance to read through all of the questions, but I have a couple that I hope you can answer.
Before leaving for Portugal they had asked Christian to answer a series of questions - some about me, some about him, and some about us as a couple.
i have a couple of nerdy questions, though, that i would love to have your answer on: 1.
I have a couple of questions that I could not find the answer to from any of the posts.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
The SI NHL staff takes a swing at answering some big questions surround the postseason and make a couple of predictions along the way.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z