I know you're far behind on votes here but this is by far the best
answer given the parameters I set.
Not exact matches
Standard mathematical formulas
give inconsistent
answers when lasers of different color are used to measure the plasma
parameters.
If I want to be sure that my finite element analysis (FEA) of a mechanical system, for instance, is
giving a reasonable
answer, I first check it is consistent with a simplified analytical approximation and then change the analysis
parameters, such as cell number and shape, to see that my FEA solution doesn't change drastically.
For some values of the
parameters they
give just banal periodic
answers.
give him essentially any
answer he wanted, as long as he didn't mind using
parameters that don't make any physical sense.»
HPD is sensitive to monotonic transforms of the
parameter in question — it will tell different stories for standard deviation, variance, precision (reciprocal variance), and log variance, while equal tails will
give the same
answer for all such transformations, if appropriately computed.
You had to elaborate your
answer by saying that gases with non polar molecule symmetry do not absorb or emit energy within the temperature
parameters with any application in engineering, e.g. O2, N2, H2..., while gases with polar molecule symmetries are significant absorbers and emitters of radiative energy, e.g. H2O, CO2, SO3... for engineering applications, depending of their density, temperature and pressure in a
given environment.
Straightforward cascading logic utilising demand
parameters and pricing
parameters will
give the
answers (within the characteristics of power networks optimised to function in this way).
They contain
parameters (that is, pieces of input information) whose numerical values are selected primarily to
give the right
answer about today's climate rather than because of some actual measurement.