Sentences with phrase «answer is at the end»

The answer is at the end of the smart file.

Answers are at the end for self assessment.

Answer is at end of post.

The easy answer is at the end of your LinkedIn profile summary.

The answers are at the end of the column.

Not exact matches

Finding the time to answer emails, handle paperwork and then still have enough energy left over at the end of the day to knock out my own list of design tasks for me personally was and still is from time to time a hurdle.

I was nervous, but I did my best — even included a few jokes — and answered a few questions at the end.

To enter our contest, leave a comment, at the end of this blog post, answering the following question: Why is work flexibility important to you?

A Bob - omb at the top of the level's end indicates the answer was «1.»

The question and answer session at the end of the speech was brisk and suggested quite a lot of resistance to my predictions.

My colleague Aaron Wherry at Maclean's is still waiting for an answer from the CBSA to his query: «To qualify under 9948, must sellers of iPods and MP3 players collect «end user certificates» from the final consumer?»

Barry Ritholtz was having a great conversation with Scott Galloway at the end of last year which I believe proffers the best answer:

At the end, the answer is in our self, not by the acts and words of others.

Christians have their rationalizations to explain this, but at the end of the day there simply is no evidence that there is a God answering any prayer of any kind.

If the answer is yes, then I must say in firm admonition that you have completely and utterly dismissed God's ultimate act of love and dismissed it for some eartly mush that ends at the persona last breath.

In another tweet, Lindelof also answers a question regarding what happened at the end of Seinfeld: «They were in jail all along.»

«When this is all over,» Judah answers, «the tyrant toppled, The killing at an end, all signs of these cruelties long gone, A new government of love will be established in the venerable David tradition.

The fullness of God is unexplainable and there can be no other answer at the end of the «and, before that was...» question chain.

The odds are slim that we will ever arrive at a place in our lives when all of our questions are answered, all our loose ends tied up, all our stories finished with «happily ever after.»

As a result, now at the end of his adventures, Abraham is ready to replace the «reasons» for being a follower of God: Originally, he answered the call largely out of a desire for the promised reward; now, in a reversal, he is ready to follow out of awe - fear - reverence for the One Who promises.

I'm going to get this out of the way first, so you can be frustrated at the beginning of this post instead of the end — I'm not going to give you the answer.

to be at your end of answers.

The full answer to that question can only be given by looking at the next two chapters on judgment and the end of the world.

If I were God, Iâ $ ™ d have the answers at the end of the workbook so you could check as you went along, to see if youâ $ ™ re on the right track.

He said, «It was a full decade before I could stand before a class and answer the searching questions of the students at the end of a lecture without the sense of being a fraud who pretended to a larger and more comprehensive knowledge than I possessed.»

This is kind of like asking god to answer my prayer because I said the magic words, «In Jesus Name» at the end.

C.S. Lewis portrayed it best in the Chronicles of Narnia: The Last Battle: At the end, the dwarfs thought they had all the answers, so when they were sitting in the middle of Lewis's portayal of heaven, to which the faithful crossed through a stable, all they could see were the walls of the stable.

If at the end the answer is given that it is Prajapati who has created everything, this is thought by many to have been a later addition.

Well, to be honest, I don't know who to answer that question, except perhaps neither end of the stick, or, perhaps looking at the stick through a glass darkly.

When we understand human nature as the pinnacle and goal of material development it all appears to come to nothing, or at least to frustration, without an end in God - and that quandary can not be answered from within the categories and potential of created being.

At a time when liberalism needs to throw its weight around with a unified moral answer to the three big questions of our time — peace, poverty and plenty — there is evidence that the deep, deep sleep of liberal spirituality, from which there seems to be a reluctance to rouse, is coming to an end.

If that is all life means then our answer is no answer at all, because surely all these things end in nothing.

It has been said that whenever some older theologians got to a hard place they simply quoted a few lines of Wordsworth or Tennyson, thinking that ended the matter; or they made a few biblical citations as if that were the complete answer; or (at worst), when the attack was most fierce, they used the word «mystery» as a kind of «escape - hatch».

The answer to the question «What does Son of God means» is too long and at the end of it means nothing.

Should add that this series of posts is great and not questioning your faith, but at the end of all the searching, the questions may not have an answer, or answers that satisfy, but going forward the only choices are not to give answers that are not answers or to abandon things.

The Prisoner remains silent throughout, answering him, at the end, only with a kiss.17 It is no less than the supplanting of power with love, poetically rendered.

The standard method of theological education — a method practiced in the public schools and on through the university — is one of attending a certain number of classes, drafting some papers and, at the end of the term or course, writing the answers to some questions in order to indicate comprehension of the materials covered.

It is Ball & Company at their very best, avoiding, like the Book of Job, the temptation for happy endings, easy math or easy answers.

At the end of the day after the blood was spilled & death made it's grand entrance; the people of God, the Christians gathered for prayer, not because we had the answers or that we are somehow better than those who don't believe what we believe, but because even at the center of despair, we feel an undying need to taste our Father's grace when all else seems to be losAt the end of the day after the blood was spilled & death made it's grand entrance; the people of God, the Christians gathered for prayer, not because we had the answers or that we are somehow better than those who don't believe what we believe, but because even at the center of despair, we feel an undying need to taste our Father's grace when all else seems to be losat the center of despair, we feel an undying need to taste our Father's grace when all else seems to be lost.

; or (iii) let's them think there is some kind of cosmic justice to remove their bad feelings at what they perceive as an injustice on Earth — «Zimmerman will answer to God in the end.»

The way Lancaster and Shackelford see it, Krog Street Market, which only officially opened its doors at the end of 2014, is the answer to the new Atlantans.

Every now and then the roasting flesh would be turned over with long oak sticks sharpened smoothly to a point at one end, which answered the place of forks; deep and long incisions would be made in the barbecuing meat, and with the swab a good basting of the mixed condiments from the bowl would be spread over; the process of turning the roasting flesh over the glowing red coals and basting with the seasoning continued till the meat was thought to be thoroughly done.

If there's solace for Howard to take from a lost season that seems destined to end on Sunday in Game 4, it probably lies at least in part on the likelihood that a playoff exit will keep him from answering questions, at least for a little while.

We are looking very thin carzola wont be back elneny is out until at least the end of February we need to bluster our midfield our attacking midfield yes we can shuffle around with elexis and ozil and iwobi but is it the long term answer no I do nt think so as the attacking midfield is the place where most injuries occur along the side of the defense so if any one else gets injured we will very short and in deep trouble maybe after all we should call upon fabergas if no one else is available on a personal preference I would prefer veratie

As Allen sees it, his main duty at Cooperstown will be to answer questions from fans and writers, and to meet that end he already has several projects under way.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

@Admin, If you had asked this question at the end of the Leicester match, my answer would be yes!!!

At the same time, it's also clear that he won't ever be as good as he could've been, but the question is how much of his talent he'll end up wasting and right now it seems the answer might actually be that not as much as previously thought.

The Spaniard was signed from Deportivo La Coruña at the end of the last transfer window with a great goalscoring record in La Liga, and was hailed as the answer to Arsenal's striker problems at last.

Honestly speaking I didn't know.Did they give a» stone wall» answer that he's leaving?What I'm saying is 100 % that Wenger is leaving Arsenal at the end of this season.It will be announced at the end of the season and not before though.