We can not
answer such a simple question.
Not exact matches
The news begged for a
simple question to be
answered: How could
such an obscure concoction ever end up on the menu of an American casual dining chain?
There are no
simple answers to
questions of fair play in
such complicated matters as this.
I admit this is not a
question admitting of
simple answers, but it is precisely the role of the imagination to grapple with
such difficulties and create something new: in that it shares in some way in the Creator's creativity.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than
answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as
such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those
simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just
such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Ask your teen involved
questions that move beyond
simple answers,
such as «yes» or «no,» to in - depth responses.
At this age, your child will start
answering simple questions,
such as «Do you want a snack?»
Simple explanations
such as «we decided we did not want to remain married, but we are still a family»,
answers the child's
question without assigning blame.
A technique was then developed to determine whether
such tasks could be used to communicate yes - or - no
answers to
simple questions.
Simple question but probably a complex
answer given the variables
such as age, weight, gender, diet (intake and composition of that intake), and exercise levels.
With OKCupid, rather than facing a blank box and having to conjure up an
answer for a
question such as «Write about your personal strong points», users are instead asked quick,
simple questions that populate their profile, making the process far less interview - like and far more fun.
The
answer to these
questions is
simple: If your students are choosing to create something out of code, then provide them with the resources (
such as the links in this post) and send them on their way.
Examine appropriate reference and fiction and nonfiction resources,
such as How Things Work by David Macaulay and The Great Wall of China by Leonard Everett Fisher, in order to develop a list of basic tools and
simple machines and
answer such research
questions as: What are some tools and devices that have been invented to make life easier?
Simple interactions
such as allowing the learner to pick where the character goes to explore or how they
answer a
question will help give the learner a sense of ownership over the characters fate.
Keep your language
simple and accessible, and if there's dead space after you've given your
answer, take control of the interview with a
simple question such as... do you have any more
questions?
While some families might be able to interpret
such a complex system, most families will be left frustrated when they try to
answer the
simple question, «How is my child's school doing?»
Perhaps it is easier to start with a few
questions and a few
simple acronyms to have the
answers to
such questions handy:
Such a simple question; such a complicated answer,
Such a
simple question;
such a complicated answer,
such a complicated
answer, ha.
Dear Than, You might think that
such simple questions — asking whether to close credit cards and whether student loans affect your credit score — would bring
simple answers.
It sounds like
such a
simple question, but only one in five people taking our online quiz knows the
answer.
Because the Family offers
such a wide variety of products, there is no
simple answer to this
question.
The evidence is complex and often inconclusive, and there are no
simple or one - size - fits - all
answers to client
questions about if and when to neuter their male dogs.2 There also are justifications for neutering males other than direct individual health benefits,
such as population control and managing undesirable behaviors.
Answers to Questions Search frequently asked questions (FAQs) to find simple, clear answers from experts on topics such as nutrition, reproduction, health care, management, training and behavior, selection, and many other
Answers to
Questions Search frequently asked questions (FAQs) to find simple, clear answers from experts on topics such as nutrition, reproduction, health care, management, training and behavior, selection, and many othe
Questions Search frequently asked
questions (FAQs) to find simple, clear answers from experts on topics such as nutrition, reproduction, health care, management, training and behavior, selection, and many othe
questions (FAQs) to find
simple, clear
answers from experts on topics such as nutrition, reproduction, health care, management, training and behavior, selection, and many other
answers from experts on topics
such as nutrition, reproduction, health care, management, training and behavior, selection, and many other topics.
If this is the case, then one must
answer some fundamental
questions,
such as why do
simple models show much more warming in the last century than was actually observed?
Some features among all classes of models are robust, but it is often the
questions that can't be
answered with
such simple approaches (what is the sign of the cloud feedback?
Which didn't
answer my
question, because I knew the
simple answer was no - it's beyond stupid to think it could warm a swimming pool, the
question is how much could
such concentrated sunlight have on a small quantity of water.
But I am rather surprised that my just asking a
simple question and persisting until I get a decent
answer gets you all in
such a froth and a flummery that you appear to have lost all control of your emotions.
It's a disturbing sign of our times that
such a
simple question can trigger a political storm — especially because the
answer will save lives and money.
My guess is you don't know and your amateur attempts to build a structured system have become so hopelessly complex and interwoven (spaghetti) that at this point you can't unwind it to produce a
simple answer to a
simple question — where does raw monthly average data for Portland - Troutdale for the year 1950 come from and how is it processed
such that it ends up 0.7 F cooler than the what the station keeper recorded in his monthy reports?
Because it is
such a
simple and obvious
question with a very
simple answer.
In the tradition of mummering, every blogger visited in Blawg Review # 89 will be permitted to ask no more than three
questions in a single private email to the editor as to his identity — each
question requiring a
simple «yes or no»
answer — but may not ask a direct
question as to a name or other pseudonym used by the editor,
such as, «Are you so - and - so?»
A
simple and easy
answer to
such questions is that the monthly contribution made by the subscriber depends on the amount of fixed pension that he wishes to get and the age at which the subscriber joins the plan.
Typically, an applicant's approval for coverage will depend primarily on the
answers to just a few
simple questions that are
answered on the application for coverage, as well as information that is obtained via the Medical Information Board (MIB) and possible certain other sources
such as the applicant's pharmacy records.
It can
answer simple questions, like what is the weather as well as more advanced features
such as the ability to get information from a picture via the camera of architectural landmarks.
Like other personal assistants, you can ask Bixby
simple questions and receive an
answer as well as more advanced features
such as the ability to get information from a picture via the camera of architectural landmarks.
Bixby will
answer simple questions, as well as give you access to more advanced features
such as identifying architectural landmarks when you look through the camera lens.
You can ask Bixby
simple questions and receive an
answer as well as more advanced features
such as the ability to get information from a picture via the camera of architectural landmarks.
Some of these
questions are not
simple to
answer,
such as — Are you doing what you love?
Answer: You can not say no to an employer when he asks
such a
simple yet critical
question.
It's
such a
simple question when we're kids, and we
answer it with enthusiasm and archetypal
answers.
Be conscious of how you
answer even the
simplest of
questions,
such as «Are you at least 18 years of age?»
Simple explanations
such as «we decided we did not want to remain married, but we are still a family»,
answers the child's
question without assigning blame.
Answer questions concerning properties listed with the firm, EXCEPT to confirm that a property is listed, to identify the listing broker or sales agent, and to provide
such information as would normally appear in a
simple, classified newspaper advertisement (location and / or address).
A conversation is a volley, Fine says, so it's good to be prepared with a
simple one - sentence
answer to
questions such as «How are you?»