The subtle difference between these questions is that if the answer to the second question is «yes», then whenever heat is being trapped by an object, the object's temperature will rise; whereas a «yes»
answer to the first question only implies that the «trapping of heat» may cause a temperature rise, not that it must.
Not exact matches
If you
answered «yes»
to only the
first question, but «no»
to either of the other two, change your sales approach and do another round of the customer validation process (starting with phase 1).
Shortening the form by asking different
questions over time lets the marketing team provide the sales team with detailed contact files for qualified leads, but saves the lead from having
to answer 14
questions when they've
only just started identifying a need in the
first place.
I am using the term «dialectic» in its ancient and etymological sense, and it seems appropriate
to describe the process by this word; for instead of an aprioristic, deductive method of procedure, the process was one of
answering questions and objections as they arose, not in anticipation, and not as the unfolding, more geometrico, of a system implicit within a body of axioms or
first principles which one needed
only accept and then all the rest followed logically
to the final Q.E.D..
The
only slightly challenging
question was about the
First Great Awakening (Jonathan Edwards - if I had
to write the name from memory, I would have likely
answered wrong as I always want
to say George Edwards... and Jonathan Whitefield).
While we must still admit that nature reveals
to us
only the
answers to questions selectively focused by our interpretive structures, we may reaffirm that we are still in her leading strings,
to reverse Kant's point, because reality is the
first motive for the natural process of thinking as well as the final measure of its results.
The
only logical
answer to the
question as
to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same
answer initially given by the atheist or any person,
to the
question who will be the
first person who will be able
to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.
So in
answer to the
first question about immortality — does it exist — a relational view would
answer: If it does, it's
only because of God.
You
only have
to go back
to the very
first chapter of Genesis
to answer the
question of why women should not pastor or preach.
therefore not
only requires you
to come up with your own
answers, but also consider what the
questions were in the
first place.
A full reading of Annihilation therefore not
only requires you
to come up with your own
answers, but also consider what the
questions were in the
first place.
The essays on Yeats differ in leaving the specific verdict
to the discretion of the reader; they are intended (especially the
first)
to answer only the preliminary
question as
to what constitute Yeats's pervading ideas.
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self,
only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel
to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards
to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have
only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems
to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early
to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency
to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs
to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious
to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently
to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow
to ever boss the midfield and he tends
to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed
to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready
to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him
to use Francis and then he had the nerve
to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary
to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed
to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends
to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little
to no sense considering what he has
to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford
to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so
only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try
to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards
to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary
first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair
to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went
to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had
to choose one of those 3 players
to stay on it would be Ox due
to his potential as a plausible alternative
to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue
to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due
to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem
to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold
to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction
to heroin without the benefits
There is no real
answer to the
question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated
to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them
to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window
first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates
to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak
to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can
only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Many
first - time users
answer «no»
to the above
question,
only to find out later that their unit attracts nearly everyone in the family as well as friends and visitors.
Before the
first detailed full - sky map of the early universe was unveiled in February, astrophysicists could offer
only approximate
answers to some fundamental
questions: How old is the universe?
At
first he responded
to Courchesne's
questions only with short
answers, «but when I talked with him further, I discovered he had a tremendous wealth of knowledge,» the neuroscientist recalls.
This section is the
first and often the
only section a potential investor will read and should
answer questions like: What are you trying
to achieve with your business?
Instead of nothing, they got the pieces they needed
to not
only identify the
first ever detected collision of neutron stars but also
to answer all sorts of
questions about what happened — and
to ask a whole lot more.
His
first project was
to determine how cataracts develop, a
question he
only recently found a partial
answer to.
To answer this
question it must be
first noted that not
only does the LC produce NE but it also metabolizes it:
Rarely do you hear the full story, if
only because the person telling the story has no clue how he or she got in that position in the
first place or they're intentionally trying
to skew reader reactions
to be in their favor.If you read something and are left with
questions instead of
answers, there's more
to the story.
You
only need
to answer five easy preliminary
questions in order
to become a member of FortiesConnect.com including whether you're a man looking for a woman or a woman looking for a man, your date of birth,
first name, an email address and password.
If you sent your
first message,
only to realize that you forgot
to answer her
questions, it's okay
to follow up.
This particular fact raises a number of
questions that are difficult
to answer, such as how they have remained undetected for so long and why the aliens
only placed the tripods here the
first -LRB-?)
These are very similar
to matching
questions with keylists, the
only difference being that the learners are asked
to sort
answers from the second column into groups belonging
to separate classes or categories specified in the
first column.
But the
answer to your
first question is yes, the alligator chart is generally considered revenue limit
only.
When these students come across a multiple response
question (with three or four correct
answers), they could easily identify
only the
first correct
answer and then move on
to the next
question.
To succeed in document based essay papers writing you have to read and analyze the text under consideration first, and only after thorough analyzing of the text you are able to build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essa
To succeed in document based essay papers writing you have
to read and analyze the text under consideration first, and only after thorough analyzing of the text you are able to build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essa
to read and analyze the text under consideration
first, and
only after thorough analyzing of the text you are able
to build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essa
to build a proper respond
to the questions you have to answer in your document based essa
to the
questions you have
to answer in your document based essa
to answer in your document based essay.
I am so glad I reached out
to you with those
first few
questions, and I am grateful you not
only took the time
to answer my
questions (which very quickly went from a few
to a few dozen), but you spent the extra time and went above and beyond
to keep
answering questions, pointing me
to other posts / blogs / groups you thought would be good for me
to investigate, suggesting books
to help me with writing, and all the while offering a most precious gem of encouragement on top of everything else.
The
only way
to really
answer the
first question is
to start paying attention
to the prices of items that you buy, and
to the prices of alternative items that you could be buying instead.
Only a few days after Apple announced that it is planning
to return as much as $ 100 billion of its cash mountain
to shareholders via buybacks, throughout the Q&A session with Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Buffett and Charlie Munger
answered several
questions on the topic of why attracted them
to Apple in the
first place.
You've probably already found out for yourself by now, but the
answer to your
first question is: yes, this EA
only affects the chart you have it attached
to.
During my
first phone call Michele not
only answered all of my
questions, but graciously invited me
to her home
to meet her Havanese family.
First, in
answer to your
question, as a person who has worked in animal rescue in the U.S. and have 5 dogs because of irresponsible owners, when we really can
only afford 3, I would love
to see that day.
The
first night is invite
only, but the second will be open
to the public, with Sony representatives and Naughty Dog developers around
to answer questions, like why Nathan seems
to have blocked my number.
I think the
answer to that
question is a resounding yes, if
only for the
first party titles — but perhaps not right away.
Over the last two years Ms. Philbin and her team at the Hammer Museum have begun
answering these
questions firsthand as they try
to build a
first - rate contemporary art collection on a shoestring, starting with
only $ 600,000 in annual acquisition funds.
Only those rocks that can
answer yes
to the
first question and no
to the second are candidates for oil exploration.»
To entertain this nonsense, we have to ask what the temperature would be without SBR, but this question has no answer, so the only temperature we can talk about is the one we have in the first plac
To entertain this nonsense, we have
to ask what the temperature would be without SBR, but this question has no answer, so the only temperature we can talk about is the one we have in the first plac
to ask what the temperature would be without SBR, but this
question has no
answer, so the
only temperature we can talk about is the one we have in the
first place.
Robert Brown: «Bear in mind that IMO it is borderline silly
to do stat mech on an atmosphere in the
first place — it is
only useful
to answer «formal»
questions like those addressed in Velasco like «what is true thermal equilibrium given thus and such conditions» and even there the computations are enormously difficult and require a variety of basically inconsistent or non-ergodic assumptions
to be made.»
In the comment https://judithcurry.com/2011/08/04/carbon-cycle-questions/#comment-218333 «manacker» has already properly enough
answered to the
question above, e.g. like this:»
First of all, we
only have real CO2 measurements since Mauna Loa started in 1959, not 150 years.»
The thing is, it might seem like there are lots of different
answers to the second
question, but the fact is there is
only one right
answer: change yourself
first.
The
answer is somewhat similar
to the «corollary»
question, in that this wouldn't be the
only information taken into account at a motion
to suppress and one would need know why the officer requested (in your scenario demanded)
to search you in the
first place.
In
answer to the
question «does price parity mean price increase», perhaps the last word should go
to the president of the Federal Cartel Office who, in relation
to the HRS case, stated: «
Only at
first view do most favoured customer clauses used by online booking portals seem
to benefit customers.
Since the
first ski accident case, the primary
question to be
answered, and sometimes the
only question to be
answered, is whether the injury or death was caused by a risk assumed by the skier.
Only if the
answer to that
first question is in the affirmative will it be necessary
to determine whether that right of residence can be made conditional upon the person concerned having sufficient resources not
to apply for the benefit.
To answer your
question briefly, the
only school that I am aware of that has a different
first - year law curriculum is Yale, which
only requires one semester (the
first one) of required courses: Con.
First, if you elect
to not
answer health
questions, this plan is your
only option.
The reason why we ask these two
questions first is because if you're
only looking for about $ 25,000 dollars in coverage, and you're over the age of 45, there's a really good chance that you might be eligible for what is called a guaranteed issue life insurance policy that would allow you
to qualify for coverage without having
to answer any medical
questions or take a medical exam!