Sentences with phrase «answer to the first question only»

The subtle difference between these questions is that if the answer to the second question is «yes», then whenever heat is being trapped by an object, the object's temperature will rise; whereas a «yes» answer to the first question only implies that the «trapping of heat» may cause a temperature rise, not that it must.

Not exact matches

If you answered «yes» to only the first question, but «no» to either of the other two, change your sales approach and do another round of the customer validation process (starting with phase 1).
Shortening the form by asking different questions over time lets the marketing team provide the sales team with detailed contact files for qualified leads, but saves the lead from having to answer 14 questions when they've only just started identifying a need in the first place.
I am using the term «dialectic» in its ancient and etymological sense, and it seems appropriate to describe the process by this word; for instead of an aprioristic, deductive method of procedure, the process was one of answering questions and objections as they arose, not in anticipation, and not as the unfolding, more geometrico, of a system implicit within a body of axioms or first principles which one needed only accept and then all the rest followed logically to the final Q.E.D..
The only slightly challenging question was about the First Great Awakening (Jonathan Edwards - if I had to write the name from memory, I would have likely answered wrong as I always want to say George Edwards... and Jonathan Whitefield).
While we must still admit that nature reveals to us only the answers to questions selectively focused by our interpretive structures, we may reaffirm that we are still in her leading strings, to reverse Kant's point, because reality is the first motive for the natural process of thinking as well as the final measure of its results.
The only logical answer to the question as to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same answer initially given by the atheist or any person, to the question who will be the first person who will be able to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.
So in answer to the first question about immortality — does it exist — a relational view would answer: If it does, it's only because of God.
You only have to go back to the very first chapter of Genesis to answer the question of why women should not pastor or preach.
therefore not only requires you to come up with your own answers, but also consider what the questions were in the first place.
A full reading of Annihilation therefore not only requires you to come up with your own answers, but also consider what the questions were in the first place.
The essays on Yeats differ in leaving the specific verdict to the discretion of the reader; they are intended (especially the first) to answer only the preliminary question as to what constitute Yeats's pervading ideas.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Many first - time users answer «no» to the above question, only to find out later that their unit attracts nearly everyone in the family as well as friends and visitors.
Before the first detailed full - sky map of the early universe was unveiled in February, astrophysicists could offer only approximate answers to some fundamental questions: How old is the universe?
At first he responded to Courchesne's questions only with short answers, «but when I talked with him further, I discovered he had a tremendous wealth of knowledge,» the neuroscientist recalls.
This section is the first and often the only section a potential investor will read and should answer questions like: What are you trying to achieve with your business?
Instead of nothing, they got the pieces they needed to not only identify the first ever detected collision of neutron stars but also to answer all sorts of questions about what happened — and to ask a whole lot more.
His first project was to determine how cataracts develop, a question he only recently found a partial answer to.
To answer this question it must be first noted that not only does the LC produce NE but it also metabolizes it:
Rarely do you hear the full story, if only because the person telling the story has no clue how he or she got in that position in the first place or they're intentionally trying to skew reader reactions to be in their favor.If you read something and are left with questions instead of answers, there's more to the story.
You only need to answer five easy preliminary questions in order to become a member of FortiesConnect.com including whether you're a man looking for a woman or a woman looking for a man, your date of birth, first name, an email address and password.
If you sent your first message, only to realize that you forgot to answer her questions, it's okay to follow up.
This particular fact raises a number of questions that are difficult to answer, such as how they have remained undetected for so long and why the aliens only placed the tripods here the first -LRB-?)
These are very similar to matching questions with keylists, the only difference being that the learners are asked to sort answers from the second column into groups belonging to separate classes or categories specified in the first column.
But the answer to your first question is yes, the alligator chart is generally considered revenue limit only.
When these students come across a multiple response question (with three or four correct answers), they could easily identify only the first correct answer and then move on to the next question.
To succeed in document based essay papers writing you have to read and analyze the text under consideration first, and only after thorough analyzing of the text you are able to build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essaTo succeed in document based essay papers writing you have to read and analyze the text under consideration first, and only after thorough analyzing of the text you are able to build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essato read and analyze the text under consideration first, and only after thorough analyzing of the text you are able to build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essato build a proper respond to the questions you have to answer in your document based essato the questions you have to answer in your document based essato answer in your document based essay.
I am so glad I reached out to you with those first few questions, and I am grateful you not only took the time to answer my questions (which very quickly went from a few to a few dozen), but you spent the extra time and went above and beyond to keep answering questions, pointing me to other posts / blogs / groups you thought would be good for me to investigate, suggesting books to help me with writing, and all the while offering a most precious gem of encouragement on top of everything else.
The only way to really answer the first question is to start paying attention to the prices of items that you buy, and to the prices of alternative items that you could be buying instead.
Only a few days after Apple announced that it is planning to return as much as $ 100 billion of its cash mountain to shareholders via buybacks, throughout the Q&A session with Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Buffett and Charlie Munger answered several questions on the topic of why attracted them to Apple in the first place.
You've probably already found out for yourself by now, but the answer to your first question is: yes, this EA only affects the chart you have it attached to.
During my first phone call Michele not only answered all of my questions, but graciously invited me to her home to meet her Havanese family.
First, in answer to your question, as a person who has worked in animal rescue in the U.S. and have 5 dogs because of irresponsible owners, when we really can only afford 3, I would love to see that day.
The first night is invite only, but the second will be open to the public, with Sony representatives and Naughty Dog developers around to answer questions, like why Nathan seems to have blocked my number.
I think the answer to that question is a resounding yes, if only for the first party titles — but perhaps not right away.
Over the last two years Ms. Philbin and her team at the Hammer Museum have begun answering these questions firsthand as they try to build a first - rate contemporary art collection on a shoestring, starting with only $ 600,000 in annual acquisition funds.
Only those rocks that can answer yes to the first question and no to the second are candidates for oil exploration.»
To entertain this nonsense, we have to ask what the temperature would be without SBR, but this question has no answer, so the only temperature we can talk about is the one we have in the first placTo entertain this nonsense, we have to ask what the temperature would be without SBR, but this question has no answer, so the only temperature we can talk about is the one we have in the first placto ask what the temperature would be without SBR, but this question has no answer, so the only temperature we can talk about is the one we have in the first place.
Robert Brown: «Bear in mind that IMO it is borderline silly to do stat mech on an atmosphere in the first place — it is only useful to answer «formal» questions like those addressed in Velasco like «what is true thermal equilibrium given thus and such conditions» and even there the computations are enormously difficult and require a variety of basically inconsistent or non-ergodic assumptions to be made.»
In the comment https://judithcurry.com/2011/08/04/carbon-cycle-questions/#comment-218333 «manacker» has already properly enough answered to the question above, e.g. like this:» First of all, we only have real CO2 measurements since Mauna Loa started in 1959, not 150 years.»
The thing is, it might seem like there are lots of different answers to the second question, but the fact is there is only one right answer: change yourself first.
The answer is somewhat similar to the «corollary» question, in that this wouldn't be the only information taken into account at a motion to suppress and one would need know why the officer requested (in your scenario demanded) to search you in the first place.
In answer to the question «does price parity mean price increase», perhaps the last word should go to the president of the Federal Cartel Office who, in relation to the HRS case, stated: «Only at first view do most favoured customer clauses used by online booking portals seem to benefit customers.
Since the first ski accident case, the primary question to be answered, and sometimes the only question to be answered, is whether the injury or death was caused by a risk assumed by the skier.
Only if the answer to that first question is in the affirmative will it be necessary to determine whether that right of residence can be made conditional upon the person concerned having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.
To answer your question briefly, the only school that I am aware of that has a different first - year law curriculum is Yale, which only requires one semester (the first one) of required courses: Con.
First, if you elect to not answer health questions, this plan is your only option.
The reason why we ask these two questions first is because if you're only looking for about $ 25,000 dollars in coverage, and you're over the age of 45, there's a really good chance that you might be eligible for what is called a guaranteed issue life insurance policy that would allow you to qualify for coverage without having to answer any medical questions or take a medical exam!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z