Sentences with phrase «answer to the second question»

And the short answer to the second question is simply — no.

«Yes» answers to the second questions mean your rabbit is overweight.

Quick answer to the second question: I damn well hope so.

The thing is, it might seem like there are lots of different answers to the second question, but the fact is there is only one right answer: change yourself first.

In answer to your second question, my strong suspicion is that it is drafted in the shadow of a particular state consumer protection act.

One possible answer to the second question may lie in the existence of present - day life - forms within hot springs and deep - sea vents, which would have persisted long ago despite the frozen state of Earth's surface.

Mitt Romney will say «Yes» to the first question and then give a politically correct sidestep answer to the second question.

The CJEU's answer to the second question shows its willingness to interpret the Roadmap Directives as a tool for defence rights that are effective and not merely theoretical.

There are two typical answers to the second question, as is usually the case when technology is the subject: lawyers should care first because the change will (eventually) alter the way in which they research, prepare and present documents, and second because as the technology goes mainstream legal issues will arise.

The short answer to the second question is...

A possible answer to the second question may lie in the existence of present - day life - forms within hot springs and deep - sea vents, which would have persisted long ago despite the frozen state of Earth's surface.

The answer to your second question is: yes, you should be worried, but also maybe not because I'm a nobody who can't affect the market.

I don't know the answer to the second question I have not heard of any pick up from when store closes sometimes when an anchor closes in a mall, we pick up a lot of business and sometimes the traffic in the mall gets hurt so that it doesn't help us.

Biblical language elsewhere suggests that the answer to this second question is No.

The answer to the second question, that of advance in man's religious quest, must depend on the criteria which are judged valid for measuring advance.

Apparently, Elijah had missed something and was not picking up on the not - so - subtle hints God was dropping; Elijah's answer to this second question was the verbatim of the first.

A: Hi Walter, The answer to the first question is yes, they do work but the answer to the second question is no, the flavor is not the same as an outdoor gas...

The answer to the first question is yes, they do work but the answer to the second question is no, the flavor is not the same as an outdoor gas grill.

Thankfully, «no» is the answer to the second question.

The answer to the second question can be answered by a quick look at the PL table.

The answer to the second question is easier than the first.

I'd post that as an answer to your second question, but it doesn't address the spirit of the first.

I'd argue that the answer to the second question is pretty close to yes: regardless of their ultimate goals, most campaigns will end up needing three basic online components:

The answer to the second question is less straightforward.

The answer to the first question is yes and the answer to the second question is no.

I'd argue that the answer to the second question is pretty close to yes: regardless of their ultimate goals, most...

«I have no doubt at all that the answer to the second question will be yes - if the answer to the first question is yes.

The answer to the second question is as unambiguously a yes as to the first.»

Well, it looks like the answer to the first question is 63 or 32, and the answer to the second question is clearly 38 (228 + 4 + 38 = 270).

The answer to her second question is, «Nobody».

Regardless, the answer to my second question — how and why does the brain manufacture dreams?

(The answer to the second question, in a nutshell, is «Because that's not what the PhD trains them for.»

The answer to the second question turned out to be strikingly simple.

I think if he's looking for a LTR, then the answer to the second question will be self - evident after a while and you should just let the answer develop naturally.

While Twohy has some fabulous technology at his disposal and uses it to great effect, the answer to that second question is obvious: He keeps us on the edge of our seats not by dazzling us with lights and sound (even if the sound is spectacular) but by tantalizing his audience with basic, well - wrought suspense.

If your answer to the second question is «Uncle Sam» then you're not really a proponent of state flexibility after all.

The answer to the second question is simple.

Which leads us to the answer to the second question introduced at the beginning of this post: Each format through which you publish your book requires its own ISBNbecause this thirteen - digit numeral unmistakably identifies the title, edition, binding, and publisher of a given work.

The answer to this second question probably depends on your answer to the first.

If you answered no to the second question, don't feel bad, this is a common mistake made by many investors.

The answer to the second question will help you determine whether you're a good candidate for a rider.

A reasonable answer on that question, but got no answer to his second question, «How much help to your Treasury issuance is the buying of the Federal Reserve for QE2?»

In The Heretics of Finance, I received half an answer to my first question, and no answer to my second question.

There was no answer to my second question, as to whether TA is just a way of implementing a momentum strategy.

The answer to the second question will depend on how long you want to tolerate accidents in the house.

And yet the answer to the second question should be a firm no.

Answer to second question: As far as I know, the Cluetrain folk stopped adding content to the website once the book come out in» 99.