Sentences with phrase «answered by the paragraph»

Pretty much every question about how stock prices work is answered by the paragraph above, which an astonishingly large number of people don't seem to be aware of.

Not exact matches

But there are AKBs in here who can answer you by at least 4 paragraphs for each of your questions, they are deep into Wenger's a * s for real

This skips four good paragraphs by Vincent, so for more information I recommend reading the entire answer.

Your answer (and in particular the last paragraph) appears to be directly contradicted by CopperKettle's detailed and apparently informed answer.

Some answered open - ended questions about death, to remind them of their mortality in a general way, whereas others imagined they were trapped and dying in the burning apartment by reading the paragraph above.

Because I don't want to bog you down by putting you through a long winded review just to get to the answer to the question proposed in the previous paragraph, the answer is meh.

A set of basic rules (used either as a teaching tool or as a reminder for students); A set of 10 fiction and non-fiction extracts with the basic punctuation missing, each one with an answer sheet, and some labelled by section as to how many missing marks there are; and a punctuation / paragraph practice.

The question for the comparison of the Locke paragraph with a Susan B. Anthony passage is tilted in the clear direction of the answer sought and would not be used by a grade 8 teacher of average students.

With the low expectations in books keyed to the old, laundry - list - of - topics math standards, I have to accompany each night's assignment with a paragraph of my own instructions: link the question, the intermediate steps, and the answer in a complete mathematical sentence; accompany your math work with an area model; translate the problem by creating a proportion table with both rows and both columns meaningfully titled; give another equivalent form of the expression you've simplified; etc., etc..)

I defer to an expert with more information regarding when rev - limiters began to be implemented by the manufacturers to edit this answer with some of that information and remove this paragraph.

What's more, the individual doesn't seem to understand that his question can't be answered in a few paragraphs by anyone — whether they know what they're talking about or not.

Because I don't want to bog you down by putting you through a long winded review just to get to the answer to the question proposed in the previous paragraph, the answer is meh.

The three paragraphs: [The answer can be found by estimating the magnitude of water vapor feedback.

The answer might well have been that it applies only to matrimonial property, namely the property of the parties generated during the marriage otherwise than by external donation; and the consequence would have been that non-matrimonial property would have fallen for redistribution by reference only to one of the two other principles of need and compensation to which we refer in paragraph 68 below... We consider, however, the answer to be that, subject to the exceptions identified in Miller to which we turn in paragraphs 83 to 86 below, the principle applies to all the parties» property but, to the extent that their property is non-matrimonial, there is likely to be better reason for departure from equality» (para 66).

Therefore, according to the ECJ, the national supreme court «might decide to refrain from making a reference to the Court and resolve the question raised before it on its own» and it is not required «to wait until the Court of Justice has given an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the lower court» (paragraph 61).

The point of my answer is that, contrary to the last paragraph of the question, it's not realistic that GOODFILE will somehow contain BADFILE by pure bad luck.